idrankwhat 0 #1 June 14, 2006 I heard this last night on "Marketplace". This dude nails it on the head as far as I'm concerned. JEFF BIRNBAUM: So far, the scandal surrounding Jack Abramoff has produced some vivid examples of modern Washington graft--skybox tickets, pricey meals, golf junkets to Scotland. Yet at the center of it all is something more prosaic, and potentially far more explosive: good old-fashioned campaign donations. Deep in plea agreements won by Justice Department lawyers are admissions by the defendants--Abramoff and his cronies Tony Rudy, Michael Scanlon and Neil Volz--that they conspired to use campaign contributions to bribe lawmakers. Even though these gifts were fully disclosed and within prescribed limits, the government said they were criminal, and the defendants agreed. This aspect of the case hasn't gotten much attention. But if similar prosecutions were to become commonplace, the paid persuaders of the captial and their big-money clients would be dealt a body blow. If prosecutors begin to assert as a matter of routine that lobbyist gifts and campaign contributions are a form of bribery, it could open up a whole new front in the decades-old effort to break the nexus of money and politics. That would be a terrific development. After all, Congress has tried for years to reform itself and has failed miserably. Money continues to grow as an influence on the system, and lawmakers do nothing to alter that trend. "Phyisican heal thyself" doesn't have its equivalent when it comes to national legislatures. But it should, campaign finance laws, after all, are built on a legal fiction. It's this: donations are considered within the law even though they are actually bribes at root. Think of them as "legalized bribery." Interests give money to buy votes. Only the fact that campaigns have to be privately funded has forced our legal system to accept them as legit. Perhaps the only way to rein in Washington's money culture is to stop pushing elected officials to change the system but to gin up investigations like the Abramoff cases that would put lawmakers and their donors in jail. Jeff Birnbaum is a columnist for The Washington Post. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #2 June 14, 2006 Getting rid of the paid lobbyists would be one of the best things that could happen in DC....Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bch7773 0 #3 June 14, 2006 Quote Jack Abramoff So who is Abram? lol surely this has been pointed out before... MB 3528, RB 1182 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #4 June 14, 2006 QuoteGetting rid of the paid lobbyists would be one of the best things that could happen in DC.... Especially considering that we're paying for them. Think about it. I believe that the figure is seven pharmaceutical lobbyists per congressman. My guess is that each one is making at least $300K per year. Not only do we pick up their tab through high drug costs but we also use taxpayer money to subsidize the industry. We're getting hit from both sides! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
