kallend 2,026 #51 July 20, 2006 Quote>So you tell me, where did all the landers and moon buggies go? Exactly. Too bad the "scientists" who claim to know we landed on the moon have never answered that question! And I've seen so-called moon rocks on display in museums. I find rocks like that in my back yard. How dumb do they think we are? We made* some so-called "Moon dust" in our lab in the 1970s. Couldn't tell it apart from the so-called "real thing" even in an electron microscope. * passed the chemical ingredients through an induction plasma of argon at around 7,000K and rapidly quenched the products.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #52 July 20, 2006 QuoteSorry to say, but the money that WOULD have gone to stem cell research will just go somewhere else; it is not lessening federal funding in total. true, and still sad that he hasn't done anything to lesson the spending burden. But, practice practice, maybe the next admin will be more gutsy in that area ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #53 July 20, 2006 QuoteGWB was the better choice in both '00 and '08. I disagree with this veto, off the cuff. Haven't read the bill though, to be honest. 08?? Wishful thinking, Vinny. Why are you so against highly intelligent, seasoned politicians? Why do you think a pathetic loser like Shrub was a better choice? Shrub's entire life has been all about riding on the coat tails of his family. He got into Yale due to family connections. Ever read what he had to say about the Yalies back in 1994? He didn't like them because they were wicked smart. Given what a dumb fuck he is, I can understand why he feels that way. He got a free pass into the National Guard, then went AWOL because he was a coke fiend and wouldn't pass a piss test. He never faced enemy fire. He was a disaster as an oil man. He was a pathetic governor. His crowning achievement as a governor (education policy) turned out to be completely fictitious, just like No Child Left Behind is. He made millions from the Rangers because he screwed over the taxpayers on the stadium deal. Daddy's pals did great by him. His first and ONLY veto is this one. 75% of the people wanted this bill signed into law. His religious beliefs are seriously twisted. He lied during the speech he gave when he vetoed the bill. And you still think Shrub was a better choice than real professionals. That is truly amazing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #54 July 21, 2006 I find your not reading the thread humorous. I find your inability to use the search function to learn why I considered sKerry and ALGORE horrible choices humorous, but a bit less so. You and Amazon have a long way to go to make me chuckle as hard as Lucky has this year. I find your intense hatred of GWB rather sad. Highly intelligent and seasoned politicians don't drink so much iced tea they leave the room frequently to piss whilst big wigs are about. Nor do they fundraise at Buddhist temples. Or claim they would have guarded ammo dumps as POTUS. Or vote for the war before voting against it. I could go on. I found the alternate candidates unacceptable in both '00 and '04 and have no regrets about how my vote was cast. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goofyjumper 0 #55 July 21, 2006 QuoteI find your not reading the thread humorous. I find your inability to use the search function to learn why I considered sKerry and ALGORE horrible choices humorous, but a bit less so. You and Amazon have a long way to go to make me chuckle as hard as Lucky has this year. I find your intense hatred of GWB rather sad. Highly intelligent and seasoned politicians don't drink so much iced tea they leave the room frequently to piss whilst big wigs are about. Nor do they fundraise at Buddhist temples. Or claim they would have guarded ammo dumps as POTUS. Or vote for the war before voting against it. I could go on. I found the alternate candidates unacceptable in both '00 and '04 and have no regrets about how my vote was cast. What is it about Al Gore or Kerry that would be scarier than Bush? Bush WILL go down in history as the worst president ever! Oh and don't forget that Bush was not voted in in 2000, he was appointed...........(Coincidently by Florida)----------------- I love and Miss you so much Honey! Orfun #3 ~ Darla Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #56 July 21, 2006 Bush was elected - deal with it however you choose. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
philh 0 #57 July 22, 2006 Starting a war over a complete lie, squandering the good will the US had around the world after 9/11 and bothcing the war against Al queda becuase he waned to hold his main troops for IRaq. Its hard to think how any US President can be worse than GWB Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #58 July 24, 2006 QuoteBush was elected - deal with it however you choose. I guess that if you count massive voter fraud and ouiright theft of elections, you are correct, shrub was "elected". Read up on any of the facts of the 2000 and 2004 "elections"? Especially the events that took place in Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004? Even though the facts of those events is fully documented and independently verified, Faux News never reported on them, so they must not be true, eh? Try reading some of the international media. BBC is a good one. How do you explain that exit polls showed the Democratic candidates to have won, while the demostrably fraudulent results gave us the unmitigated disaster that is shrubco? You should read up a bit on exit polls and their proven accuracy before you claim that shrub was "elected". Since hannity and o'reilly (those paragons of insightful journalism) don't mention these isssues, they must not be real, eh? Real men admit it when they makes mistakes... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #59 July 24, 2006 QuoteQuoteBush was elected - deal with it however you choose. IQuote guess that if you count massive voter fraud and ouiright theft of elections, you are correct, shrub was "elected". Read up on any of the facts of the 2000 and 2004 "elections"? Especially the events that took place in Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004? Even though the facts of those events is fully documented and independently verified, Faux News never reported on them, so they must not be true, eh? Oh, great. Perhaps you can provide us with a link to this proof. QuoteTry reading some of the international media. BBC is a good one. So we should rely on a foreign news source for proof of fraud in American elections? QuoteHow do you explain that exit polls showed the Democratic candidates to have won, while the demostrably fraudulent results gave us the unmitigated disaster that is shrubco? Ummm let me take a stab at it. The exit polls were wrong? Perhaps because many people refuse to disclose who they voted for. QuoteYou should read up a bit on exit polls and their proven accuracy before you claim that shrub was "elected". OK, where can I go to read "the truth"? QuoteSince hannity and o'reilly (those paragons of insightful journalism) don't mention these isssues, they must not be real, eh? Oh, but they do mention them. Does that make them real? Real men admit it when they makes mistakes... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #60 July 24, 2006 You should read up on the facts and get back to us. Or not. Believe the conspiracy theorists if you like. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #61 July 24, 2006 >Read up on any of the facts of the 2000 and 2004 "elections"? "Gore won the 2000 election" is getting as old as "Saddam had WMD's when we invaded." Really, in both cases, no. And talking about it a lot won't change that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites