Good point.
Darius11 12
QuoteQuoteWow how strange all the fighting age men aren't on the list, or there werent any men of that age at all?
Were they not hit because they were out fighting and launching rockets?, or were they killed and went unreported?
Hizbollah has been making civilians remain (at gunpoint) in areas where they were firing rockets in hopes that the Israelis would kill a lot of them. Looks like it worked out.
mh
Really so you don’t think Israel targeting civilians leaving the city has anything to do with them staying put?
I ask this of all of you.
What has Israel done in the past to deserve such respect that most of you would consider it impossible for them to commit war crimes?
Have you no clue of the way they have treated Palestinians for years? They bulldoze any house they wish claiming it has tunnels for smuggling with out any due process, They have shot children, and Israeli tanks have opened fire on children throwing rocks at them. to mention just a few
So I ask you once again what evidence do you have to not believe Israel is just a ruthless blood trusty regime that it has always been?
I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain
Quote
If secrecy is an indicator of lying, then our White House is clearly full of liars.
Amen. Not to mention the WH's published track recored over the last few years...prosecutors and all.
Of all the war crimes charges that could be levied against the WH, I don't believe manipulating civilian casualties in the Levant is one of them.
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?
Quote
So I ask you once again what evidence do you have to not believe Israel is just a ruthless blood trusty regime that it has always been?
Rofl. Talk about a loaded question. Things like that deserve an award. Like a little crown should appear next to your name in the forum for a day or two.
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?
billvon 3,078
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)
>Bill do you really think those are accurate numbers?...I don't for one minute.
OK, post what you consider to be the correct numbers.
>Hezb'allah; we need to conceal our dead so we can claim that
>Israel is killing civilians, quick hold up that dead baby for photos by
>the media... for the next 30 minutes.
And Israel - get every network covering the one building that was actually damaged by a Hezbollah rocket, and cover it all day.
Both sides are engaged in a propaganda war, as most people at war are.
OK, post what you consider to be the correct numbers.
>Hezb'allah; we need to conceal our dead so we can claim that
>Israel is killing civilians, quick hold up that dead baby for photos by
>the media... for the next 30 minutes.
And Israel - get every network covering the one building that was actually damaged by a Hezbollah rocket, and cover it all day.
Both sides are engaged in a propaganda war, as most people at war are.
While the Israeli government and military are far from being diplomatic on most things, I would also suggest that the fact that they have not annihilated their neighbors when they have repeatedly had the chance and the upper hand on many occasions could be an indicator of how "blood thirsty they are"
BTW militaries KILL PEOPLE that is their job.
They don't make good police forces, nor diplomats, they smash things and destroy the enemy and that is what they excel at.
BTW militaries KILL PEOPLE that is their job.
They don't make good police forces, nor diplomats, they smash things and destroy the enemy and that is what they excel at.
Darius11 12
I think the reason they have not annihilated their neighbors is simple they can’t. They understand there is consequences. I don’t think for example if Israel decided to Nuk all brown people the world would sit back and not say a word.
I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain
John is the discussion of Hezb'allah something that stirs your hatred for the president, and the current administration?
Or was this just a great opportunity?
Let us put kallend's strong dislike of Bush aside for a second.
While this US adminstration does not "kick out" media who ask questions they don't like, how many times have we heard "no comment" or "I cannot answer that due to national security" in the last few years? And even on things seemingly innocuous?
So, ignoring the dislike kallend has about this administration, I think the "refusing to cooperated with media we don't like" corollary is a valid one.