Flavius 0 #1 August 8, 2017 Mine skipped a few hop & pops, especially when I pulled quickly. It seems I didn't reach a fast enough freefall for the logging software to count it as a jump. Does yours log hop & pops? How about other brands? My display also stays at 0 until about 250ft during takeoff, not sure if it's related. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slimrn 6 #2 August 8, 2017 I have noticed this as well. To avoid having to dicker with it to add jump numbers, I simply take a delay of over 10 seconds so it registers the freefall- altitude allowing of course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pobrause 6 #3 August 8, 2017 both observations you made are normal for any digital altimeter I know. It has some build in pressure margin both on the ground and in the plane/freefall as the only sensor it can work with is a barometric one. Otherwise even small weather changes would start to show some readings when you're on the ground. In the plane and start of your freefall it has a build in lag as well, otherwise every holding in the plane and loss of a few meters of altitude during glide and even jump run would trigger the start of your skydive.------------------------------------------------------- To absent friends Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IJskonijn 45 #4 August 8, 2017 Yup, my viso barely even registers half of my jumps. Granted, doing CRW I don't wait around in freefall waiting for my Viso to catch up. I simply gave up on the idea of logging, but it sometimes think I started my jump at 2000ft, just because I was dicking around with stalling my canopy after the CRW-work was over but before landing pattern. If I stop doing the stalls, I might use the logging as a chop counter, since that's the only time I do freefall anyway nowadays! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mxk 1 #5 August 8, 2017 See Dive Type Selector section in the user manual. Set it to STU. I've never had any problems with that setting detecting hop&pops. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IJskonijn 45 #6 August 8, 2017 I currently have it set to STU, which is meant for detecting short exit delays (according to the manual). I'll have a shot at setting it at SLO, see if that works better. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mxk 1 #7 August 8, 2017 IJskonijnI currently have it set to STU, which is meant for detecting short exit delays (according to the manual). I'll have a shot at setting it at SLO, see if that works better. Sorry, I meant STU. I use SLO when wingsuiting and that one does miss hop&pops if I forget to change it back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flavius 0 #8 August 9, 2017 Any downsides to STU vs default, for non-wingsuiters? Doesn't sound like default is most suitable for any type of jump. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiverek 63 #9 August 9, 2017 FlaviusAny downsides to STU vs default, for non-wingsuiters? Doesn't sound like default is most suitable for any type of jump. If the plane goes up and then suddenly down, it will register that as a jump. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IJskonijn 45 #10 August 9, 2017 Mine misses at least half my jumps even on the STU setting. I've had it on there since I bought it, and I've had entire boogies without a single jump being registered. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steven666 0 #11 September 1, 2017 I used to set my Viso 2 to STU for this hop & pop issue. It seems to work for me. My Viso 2 is a few years old. I think they updated it with a faster CPU about a year ago. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiverek 63 #12 September 1, 2017 steven666I used to set my Viso 2 to STU for this hop & pop issue. It seems to work for me. My Viso 2 is a few years old. I think they updated it with a faster CPU about a year ago. Yes, "Viso II+" has faster CPU and higher contrast screen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites