JohnRich 4 #1 September 14, 2006 News:Men are more intelligent than women, claims new study A controversial new study has claimed that men really are more intelligent than women. The study - carried out by a man - concluded that men's IQs are almost four points higher than women's. British-born researcher John Philippe Rushton, who previously created a furore by suggesting intelligence is influenced by race, says the finding could explain why so few women make it to the top in the workplace. He claims the 'glass ceiling' phenomenon is probably due to inferior intelligence, rather than discrimination or lack of opportunity... Full story: Daily Mail Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,545 #2 September 14, 2006 Oh my. What a wonderful opportunity for gross generalization . The statistical significance of 4 points is what exactly???? What's his margin of error? What's his methodology? What's his test look like? Define "intelligence" for that matter. And can you really study intelligence by looking at teenagers I read the article. I await the explosion Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lindercles 0 #3 September 14, 2006 And the most important question of all, why is that controversial? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,545 #4 September 14, 2006 QuoteAnd the most important question of all, why is that controversial?WHACK! Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
justinb138 0 #5 September 14, 2006 Quote He claims the 'glass ceiling' phenomenon is probably due to inferior intelligence, rather than discrimination or lack of opportunity... There's a good book by Warren Farrell on the subject. It's explains the "glass ceiling" thing pretty well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yamtx73 0 #6 September 14, 2006 Time to get some popcorn and watch the fireworks... The only naturals in this sport shit thru feathers... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #7 September 14, 2006 John Really Why did you even imagine this wasnt SC material! Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cudlo 0 #8 September 14, 2006 "Define "intelligence" for that matter." Generally defined (at least in my psych courses) as what can be quantified by an IQ test. General knowledge as compared to a given age group, and ability to adapt to new information._________________________________________ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Kierkegaard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,545 #9 September 14, 2006 QuoteWhy did you even imagine this wasnt SC material! What do you mean! He's just posting something from the newspaper Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #10 September 14, 2006 If men were really smarter than women, they wouldn't do studies like that. They would just keep their mouths shut. Chris _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #11 September 14, 2006 QuoteOh my. What a wonderful opportunity for gross generalization . The statistical significance of 4 points is what exactly???? What's his margin of error? What's his methodology? What's his test look like? Define "intelligence" for that matter. And can you really study intelligence by looking at teenagers I read the article. I await the explosion Wendy W. See, if you were a man you wouldn't have to ask all those questions, you'd know the answers! When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,545 #12 September 14, 2006 QuoteGenerally defined (at least in my psych courses) as what can be quantified by an IQ test. General knowledge as compared to a given age group, and ability to adapt to new information.OK, then are you smarter or stupider than someone who knows about cars. When you're in a garage. Are you smarter or stupider than someone who speaks Spanish fluently. When you're in Mexico. The point is that we're talking about fuzzy things here as we try to define what "general knowledge" is, and "ability to adapt to new information." BTW, general knowledge often isn't included. However, the assumption of a common body of knowledge is one of the things that leads to a culture-centric definition of intelligence. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,545 #13 September 14, 2006 Ya know, so far I haven't seen a single reply that couldn't go into Bonfire Good work. Let's piss someone off. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #14 September 14, 2006 Weapon threads failed. Is this the last weapon you pull out, JR? Holy donkey, ROFLMAO - I love your posts - telling a lot about you, cowboy dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #15 September 14, 2006 QuoteIf men were really smarter than women, they wouldn't do studies like that. They would just keep their mouths shut. Chris You are a very wise young man, Chris edited for typo dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #16 September 14, 2006 yep, Chis has it right. The guy that did this study will never get laid again, so we can conclude he's a moron. Therefore we shouldn't trust his results. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #17 September 14, 2006 QuoteYa know, so far I haven't seen a single reply that couldn't go into Bonfire Good work. Let's piss someone off. Wendy W. "I hear the sound of distance drums - far away, far away ..." dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jshatzkin 0 #18 September 14, 2006 There is a lot of study and discussion in the area of intelligence. Daniel Goleman has done some great stuff on emotional intelligence, which measures a different type of intelligence than IQ. He calls it EQ, and it seems to play a bigger role in job/relational/ overall success than IQ. Some argue that IQ tests are biased and narrow and do not really define or conclude the totality of what true intelligence entails. Intelligence is so wide and complex, to "measure" it by a simple written test and nothing else, is slowly showing to be inaccurate.Jen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lindsey 0 #19 September 14, 2006 QuoteThere is a lot of study and discussion in the area of intelligence. Daniel Goleman has done some great stuff on emotional intelligence, which measures a different type of intelligence than IQ. He calls it EQ, and it seems to play a bigger role in job/relational/ overall success than IQ. Some argue that IQ tests are biased and narrow and do not really define or conclude the totality of what true intelligence entails. Intelligence is so wide and complex, to "measure" it by a simple written test and nothing else, is slowly showing to be inaccurate. Are you TRYING to start another 10-page waste of your time...lol. :) linz-- A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jshatzkin 0 #20 September 14, 2006 No. Just stating that many psychologists are discussing/disagreeing about the definition of intelligence, including the testing of it! I have no real opinion either way I have read some studies that point to women having better verbal capabilities and men having better mathmatical capabilities,..but some argue that sexes are socialized in school and community toward these areas. So much still to learn about intelligence!Jen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vortexring 0 #21 September 14, 2006 your mental wee man 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #22 September 14, 2006 Quote What a wonderful opportunity for gross generalization . The statistical significance of 4 points is what exactly???? What's his margin of error? What's his methodology? What's his test look like? I'm sure one could find a 4 pt range, and it would be statistically significant. It's nearly half a standard deviation. But all your other questions are more important. There are many different measures for IQ, but most are an attempt to place a person on a bell curve of performance on some sort of test. Analogies are a classic favorite, but rely on the person to know the definition of the words used. And success in the workplace has so many other issues involved that I know a 4 pt delta has no real importance. Effort alone has got to be worth at least as much. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #23 September 14, 2006 QuoteYa know, so far I haven't seen a single reply that couldn't go into Bonfire You know, when I was posting my reply I suddenly found myself in SC. For a moment I thought WTF? Then went back to bonfire. Chris _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #24 September 14, 2006 Nice weather here in Chicago today.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #25 September 14, 2006 [ *tongue in cheek joke voice* ] SHUT UP!! What the hell do you know? Those are stupidhead-girly questions!! [/ *tongue in cheek joke voice* ]So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites