Recommended Posts
Butters 0
PS: Watch the discovery channel when they show predators killing prey. There are some predators that keep their prey alive while eating.
Steel 0
QuoteQuoteI have no intention to sit and debate this all day long, so I will just make this post in response. Having had a pitbull (which was the most loveable dog I ever saw) for 15 happy years, I know that this statement is a crock. To go even further my sister has a pitbull that is 10 years old and with the time I spent around that dog is also enough to that your statement was a crock. Then there is my grandmother who had a pitbull that sadly died at 7 years old. But that dog too proved to me that your statement was a crock. Come to think of it your statement seems to be utter ignorance which I have heard time and time again by people who just don't know any better.
Its true drug dealers and assholes who like to fight pitbulls tend to pick these dogs but the problem there is NOT the dogs its the OWNERS.
So, your conclusion that pit bulls are no more likely to do harm is based on what? 3 instances. That is hardly convincing.
What about the instances where it appears there was no mistreatment? It must all be a big conspiracy.
No i think its a little bit more than just 3 isolated incidents. Its a 100% success rate on the breed where I know the dogs were treated well. My pitbull also has several litters of puppies and all the people who were freinds of my family that we kept in touch with had similar positive experiences with the puppy we gave them.
For your case in which pitbulls turn out to be bad that supposedly had no mistreatement, I have also seen Labs that were raised nicely that turned out to be vicious. If you knew anything about breeding you would know that agression is something that could be found in any breed. A responsible breeder should know that when a dog like this is identified, it should not be used for breeding purposes.
But if you wish to spout off ignorance on the matter and just bash the whole breed, since there is nothing I can do about, I will just hope that there are enough people who know better to make your ignorant opinion irrelevent.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.
PLFXpert 0
Freeflybella, excellent link on veal cows.

![[:/] [:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png)
It can be overwhelming to some to go down the list of every farmed animal, all the inhumanity, etc. in one sitting. I try to stick to one thing at a time.
It's like smoking. I myself have only had one puff of one cigarette in my life. Good friends & family however have been addicts at some point in their lives. All knew the horrors of smoking, yet it was also difficult for all to quit; and different methods worked. Billy quit smoking cold turkey five years ago and that worked wonders for him. Cold turkey is also how I quit eating meat. But for my mother, a gradual reduction of cigarettes is what worked. And for Billy, a gradual reduction in how much and what kind of meats he eats works better. Thus, I tell people about Butterball turkey today (and offer an alternative) and later I'll tell them about something else. I just believe it's a more effective way of getting a message across for some. When people feel overwhelmed they're likely to just say to hell with it all altogether rather than take baby steps and realize that even those small steps DO make a difference.

From a value standpoint, the "Certified Humane" program is laudworthy. To clear up any confusion, I seriously do not have a problem with it. I like the goal of paper trails and the goal of giving wide open spaces to animals. I understand what they are trying to do.
But I will not say that all mass production farms are cruel. Some of it is. Some of it is not. My belief is that there is a good market for this, and that is great. It's a market that satisfies people's needs and desires, which is fantastic.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Take out the one person who was talking, and the two people who were using excessive force and you have a company who keeps, and slaughters turkeys. Putting them in cages , then on hooks, then in a cold water rinse and then cutting the necks is a common method and it is less painful then cutting their necks without the cold bath. Im not so much concerned that a few employees did that, it should be expected in all walks of life... what I am concerned about is what Butterball did once they found out because I do not condone the actions but I will not hold the company responisble for actions of employees if they did not know what was happening.... now they do, I bet those people depicted in the video are without jobs now.
A company like PETA who has so much negative, does not get the benefit of the doubt when they are showing something positive. They have proven time and again that they will go to extremes when showing their positions.
Sudsy Fist: but you're looking damn sudsydoable in this
rehmwa 2
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
PLFXpert 0
QuoteThere is but one prime reason I would purchase "Certified Humane" meat and dairy - if it tastes better. My assumption is that it does taste better - the more stress-free the animal is, the better the quality of the meat.
Interesting, as many delicacies "taste better" b/c of the horrible things they do to the animals before slaughter (see what makes veal & foie gras "taste good".
![[:/] [:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png)
If taste is your #1 priority, would you say that despite knowledge on foie gras that you would purchase it anyways b/c you love the taste?
Though I love great-tasting foods myself; food is for sustenance. Unfortunately many people have forgotten that (or just never attended biology class).
DJL 235
Quotepaté and veal
And Foie Gras! YUM YUM!!!!
PLFXpert 0
QuoteTake out the one person who was talking, and the two people who were using excessive force and you have a company...
It's a nice thought (and well-constructed post, thank you

Unfortunately this isn't an isolated investigation. In fact there have been numerous investigations, by numerous organizations (other than PETA) into numerous industires that raise animals for slaughter or dairy. It is b/c of such investigating that we do have "certified humane" options now.
QuoteThey have proven time and again that they will go to extremes when showing their positions.
I 100% agree. And I'm not such a person that needs to witness a horrible act to understand such an act exists, is wrong, and I do not wish to support it. For some people, though, you can tell them "Hey! Don't buy that turkey as they are abused."
"Really? How do you know? It's on sale and I'm buying turkey anyways, so might as well buy this one."
Take that same person and show them a video and suddenly they'd rather pay $5 more for the "certified humane" turkey which might not be on sale, but they feel a little better about themselves at the end of the day.
I've viewed photos and videos of acts that make my stomach churn, make tears roll down my cheek, and it reinforces my actions & purchases; b/c even I am tempted toward some things. But for me it's "Eat some yummy vegetarian lasagna & sleep well tonight or don't sleep but eat this delicious honey-baked ham."

micro 0
QuoteQuoteThere is but one prime reason I would purchase "Certified Humane" meat and dairy - if it tastes better. My assumption is that it does taste better - the more stress-free the animal is, the better the quality of the meat.
Interesting, as many delicacies "taste better" b/c of the horrible things they do to the animals before slaughter (see what makes veal & fois gras "taste good".)
If taste is your #1 priority, would you say that despite knowledge on fois gras that you would purchase it anyways b/c you love the taste?
Though I love great-tasting foods myself; food is for sustenance. Unfortunately many people have forgotten that (or just never attended biology class).
First of all, PLFXpert, this -for me at least-is turning into an excellent thread. Thanks for starting it and opening your "can of worms" for us to savor.

As to lawrocket's post, while I typically agree w/ most of what he says, in this particular instance we part company to some extent. It would seem here that he suffers from a strictly utilitarian mindset that is all too commen unfortunately in the large agriculture business specifically and in capitalism generally, as if any means justify the ends. If it tastes good, I don't particularly care how it was raised. That misses the boat entirely.
We can't forget that these animals are LIVING things, capable of feeling pain, capable of suffering. Don't misunderstand me, i'm not equating them w/ humans, I'm not putting them on par w/ us in the food chain, but neither am i committing the falacy that just b/c we have "dominion" over them can we do w/ them whatever the hell we feel like doing either, even if that means making them more pleasing to our palates!
For me at least, knowing what suffering the calf went through to become that tasty veal, it then becomes not so tasty any more. My appetite is ruined by the knowledge of what happened to the creature just so I could "enjoy" it for that fleeting moment.
As PLFXpert said, food is PRIMARILY for sustenance and only SECONDARILY for pleasure. That isn't to say that the pleasure of eating isn't important. If eating weren't pleasurable, it would become a drudgery and we wouldn't look forward to it anymore than we would to an enema.
I miss Lee.
And JP.
And Chris. And...
So, your conclusion that pit bulls are no more likely to do harm is based on what? 3 instances. That is hardly convincing.
What about the instances where it appears there was no mistreatment? It must all be a big conspiracy.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites