rushmc 23 #1 November 15, 2006 And it is from !!!!!!!!!!! sorry not NewsMax http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington//16012061.htm"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #2 November 15, 2006 QuoteAnd it is from !!!!!!!!!!! sorry not NewsMax http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington//16012061.htmold old old old oldI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #3 November 15, 2006 Date line is Tuesday Nov 14 2006?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #4 November 15, 2006 Even the study is dated today. You are in error me thinks??"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #5 November 15, 2006 I heard Rush Limbaugh proclaim that he was certain there would always be plenty of oil because God loves us and wants us to be happy. First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azdiver 0 #6 November 15, 2006 what about golds theory on oil.light travels faster than sound, that's why some people appear to be bright until you hear them speak Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cloudseeker2001 0 #7 November 15, 2006 I have a good family friend that is an expert in oil and gas field and he believes at the current rate the world uses oil, all known oil fields will be mostly dry in 250 years. "Some call it heavenly in it's brilliance, others mean and rueful of the western dream" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,995 #8 November 15, 2006 >he believes at the current rate the world uses oil . . . So how do you figure we stop them from using more oil than they use now? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,995 #9 November 15, 2006 >Are we really runnig out of oil? The answer from the article you posted is "yes." "CERA argues that the world is likely to begin running out of oil between 2030 and the middle of the century." To paraphrase a famous man - we know we're running out, we're just arguing over the date. I'll be around in 2030, and I assume you will be too. And my kids will definitely be. We're doomed unless we can switch to alternatives before then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 333 #10 November 15, 2006 QuoteI heard Rush Limbaugh proclaim that he was certain there would always be plenty of oil oxycontin because God loves us and wants us to be happy. fixed it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n23x 0 #11 November 15, 2006 I have a family acquaintance that knows this guy that bought gasoline for his car this one time in the 80s and he said that they already ran out of gas! Here's how it's going to work. 1.) We will, as fatass, lazy, spoiled Americans (capitol A), refuse to make real progress towards alternate fuels (because our SUV is not awesome enough driving mom and her one kid if it's not guzzling gas and roaring like a semi). 2.) We will try to keep gas prices low enough that nobody is economically motivated to make the change. 3.) Decline will occur, and we will be hurting. d.) We will be forced to make changes over a short period of time; because, rather than thinking things through we barely see past the end of our nose. I will win because I am going to power my car and things with love. or stealing. it's hard to tell. .jim"Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #12 November 15, 2006 It's like running out of fresh water. THe more we use, the less we have to use. Running out? At this pace, yeah. Oh, we can find other technoligies to squeeze more out of other places, but that's how it goes... My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,995 #13 November 15, 2006 > It's like running out of fresh water. 'cept the planet keeps making more fresh water. Stop using it and the lake fills back up. Nothing's going to fill the oil reservoirs back up (at least within a time frame that's useful to us.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PeterB 0 #14 November 15, 2006 I bet recreational activities that depend on fossil fuel are gonna be some of the things that are hit first, too. Oh well, there's always BASE. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #15 November 15, 2006 QuoteOh well, there's always BASE. i thought parachutes were made of fossil materials? can a parachute be made out of recycled materials? i really dont know. i really dont care. a trillion more barrels of oil, ill be dead, and i wont have kids. burn what fuel i can while im still alive. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #16 November 15, 2006 Quote>Are we really runnig out of oil? The answer from the article you posted is "yes." But the bigger question is how will we be impacted? The World's oil reserves have been declining for decades. Technically, we've been running out for over a century. On a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #17 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuote>Are we really runnig out of oil? The answer from the article you posted is "yes." But the bigger question is how will we be impacted? The World's oil reserves have been declining for decades. Technically, we've been running out for over a century. On a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. [/replyI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites steveorino 7 #18 November 15, 2006 QuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #19 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. I saw that. Looks like a local issue. Maybe the oil companies are expecting big increase in demand in the Tulsa area. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,027 #20 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. It's up in IL and IN too.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #21 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. It's up in IL and IN too. From what I've seen, prices in IL are up a penny since 11/07 and they are down about three cents in IN. Nationally, prices are up about two cents. What we're talking about is mere noise... nothing more. My previous point was directed at the conspiracy theorists, who think Exxon et al easily manipulate prices, even claiming the late Summer decline of 80 cents (at the pump) was some kind of inside job. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,995 #22 November 15, 2006 >But the bigger question is how will we be impacted? That depends on how ready we are. If the peak happened today, the results would be a depression that rivaled the 1929's. If it happens in 10-15 years, and 50% of our vehicles can run on something besides oil, it won't be too bad (though will still cause problems.) >The World's oil reserves have been declining for decades. Reserves have been declining but _production_ has been increasing. There will come a point where the easily-accessible oil will be running out faster than we can sink new (less productive) wells in marginal deposits. At that point output will decline no matter what we do. That's called the Hubbert Peak. It already happened in the US; we hit it in the 70's. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites NCclimber 0 #23 November 15, 2006 Quote >The World's oil reserves have been declining for decades. Reserves have been declining but _production_ has been increasing. There will come a point where the easily-accessible oil will be running out faster than we can sink new (less productive) wells in marginal deposits. At that point output will decline no matter what we do. That's called the Hubbert Peak. It already happened in the US; we hit it in the 70's. Hubbert (and proponents of his theory) have predicted global peaks in 1989, 1995, 2000 and 2005. They seem to keep moving the goal posts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,995 #24 November 15, 2006 >Hubbert (and proponents of his theory) have predicted global peaks >in 1989, 1995, 2000 and 2005. They seem to keep moving the goal > posts. M. King Hubbert predicted that the US oil production would peak in the 1970's. He was right. He predicted that world oil peak would come "in about a half a century" - which would put the peak around 2020. Oddly, similar to what Mark's paper claims. Since he died in 1989, I find your belief that he predicted peak oil occurring in 1995, then 2000, then 2005 pretty funny. Did he come back from the grave for these pronouncements? Or was it more a spirit-medium thing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jcd11235 0 #25 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. It's up in IL and IN too. And Orlando.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
steveorino 7 #18 November 15, 2006 QuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #19 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. I saw that. Looks like a local issue. Maybe the oil companies are expecting big increase in demand in the Tulsa area. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #20 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. It's up in IL and IN too.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #21 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. It's up in IL and IN too. From what I've seen, prices in IL are up a penny since 11/07 and they are down about three cents in IN. Nationally, prices are up about two cents. What we're talking about is mere noise... nothing more. My previous point was directed at the conspiracy theorists, who think Exxon et al easily manipulate prices, even claiming the late Summer decline of 80 cents (at the pump) was some kind of inside job. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,995 #22 November 15, 2006 >But the bigger question is how will we be impacted? That depends on how ready we are. If the peak happened today, the results would be a depression that rivaled the 1929's. If it happens in 10-15 years, and 50% of our vehicles can run on something besides oil, it won't be too bad (though will still cause problems.) >The World's oil reserves have been declining for decades. Reserves have been declining but _production_ has been increasing. There will come a point where the easily-accessible oil will be running out faster than we can sink new (less productive) wells in marginal deposits. At that point output will decline no matter what we do. That's called the Hubbert Peak. It already happened in the US; we hit it in the 70's. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #23 November 15, 2006 Quote >The World's oil reserves have been declining for decades. Reserves have been declining but _production_ has been increasing. There will come a point where the easily-accessible oil will be running out faster than we can sink new (less productive) wells in marginal deposits. At that point output will decline no matter what we do. That's called the Hubbert Peak. It already happened in the US; we hit it in the 70's. Hubbert (and proponents of his theory) have predicted global peaks in 1989, 1995, 2000 and 2005. They seem to keep moving the goal posts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,995 #24 November 15, 2006 >Hubbert (and proponents of his theory) have predicted global peaks >in 1989, 1995, 2000 and 2005. They seem to keep moving the goal > posts. M. King Hubbert predicted that the US oil production would peak in the 1970's. He was right. He predicted that world oil peak would come "in about a half a century" - which would put the peak around 2020. Oddly, similar to what Mark's paper claims. Since he died in 1989, I find your belief that he predicted peak oil occurring in 1995, then 2000, then 2005 pretty funny. Did he come back from the grave for these pronouncements? Or was it more a spirit-medium thing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #25 November 15, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteOn a tangential issue, why are oil prices not rising? The election was eight days ago. Gas jumped from $1.97 to $2.09 two days after the election in Tulsa. It's up in IL and IN too. And Orlando.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites