Cloudburst 0 #26 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteI really don’t get what the big deal is. You have a guy who killed his ex. Who was fucking some other dude who was driving his car and using his money. I can see why OJ was pissed. and he should have goon to jail, but he didnt. Do people really think this is the biggest Injustice we have in our history? It would be great if people focused there energy on more important things then celebrities. Fuck OJ fuck Nicole and the dude she was fucking. i think it's because OJ is a nigger If THAT reply won't ban you then some mods here are wusses. that's the best "forcing their hand" post i've seen in a while Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites steveorino 7 #27 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI really don’t get what the big deal is. You have a guy who killed his ex. Who was fucking some other dude who was driving his car and using his money. I can see why OJ was pissed. and he should have goon to jail, but he didnt. Do people really think this is the biggest Injustice we have in our history? It would be great if people focused there energy on more important things then celebrities. Fuck OJ fuck Nicole and the dude she was fucking. i think it's because OJ is a nigger If THAT reply won't ban you then some mods here are wusses. that's the best "forcing their hand" post i've seen in a while I'm trying -- your slang is totally without any redeeming value. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Cloudburst 0 #28 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI really don’t get what the big deal is. You have a guy who killed his ex. Who was fucking some other dude who was driving his car and using his money. I can see why OJ was pissed. and he should have goon to jail, but he didnt. Do people really think this is the biggest Injustice we have in our history? It would be great if people focused there energy on more important things then celebrities. Fuck OJ fuck Nicole and the dude she was fucking. i think it's because OJ is a nigger If THAT reply won't ban you then some mods here are wusses. that's the best "forcing their hand" post i've seen in a while I'm trying -- your slang is totally without any redeeming value. i know you're trying, it warms the cockles of my heart Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #29 November 17, 2006 I still think CB was calling D a racist in that reply. Which is more clearly a PA. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Cloudburst 0 #30 November 17, 2006 QuoteI still think CB was calling D a racist in that reply. Which is more clearly a PA. are you using your big wooded stirers spoon in this topic, or just a normal spoon to stir things up? "it was him" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Casurf1978 0 #31 November 17, 2006 Yeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wmw999 2,517 #32 November 17, 2006 QuoteYeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though.Anyone who buys that book is a moron. That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Cloudburst 0 #33 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteYeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though.Anyone who buys that book is a moron. That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. Wendy W. how many blacks were on the jury? and how many of those blacks wanted some payback for Rodney King? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TomAiello 26 #34 November 17, 2006 Quotei think it's because OJ is a nigger You're out of line. Please review the Forum Rules, specifically this part: QuoteWhile discussion of certain social and political issues may require the use of sensitive or potentially offensive terms, outside of those limited contexts the use of such terms is not allowed on this board and may be removed. While I can see that your subsequent posts are attempting to debate the actual issues around the usage of such terms and whether or not they ought to be deemed offensive, your first post was obviously intended to shock and offend simply by the use of an unnecessarily offensive racial epithet. I've banned you from this forum for 14 days.-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #35 November 17, 2006 Quoteare you using your big wooded stirers spoon in this topic, or just a normal spoon to stir things up? "it was him" - your pot/kettle argument is interesting (my interpretation was you weren't racist, just calling someone else one - else you wouldn't have quoted the whole post and then summed it up so succinctly) in any case, it's not a stirrer - it's more of a pasta wand with drain bit in the back and tines - looks kind of like the head of venus fly trap when open OJ is an ass for writing and promoting this book - and that's true guilty or innocent. anyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #36 November 17, 2006 Quoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #37 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. so according to this thread, then OJ must think the suspect is a golfer? so the cops and feds just gave up? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #38 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. so according to this thread, then OJ must think the suspect is a golfer? so the cops and feds just gave up? Well, since OJ found him, why bother? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites steveorino 7 #39 November 17, 2006 QuoteYou're out of line ... I've banned you from this forum for 14 days. GOOD! I'm too old to see or hear that term in any other light other than that from my youth. Growing up in Texas in 50s & 60s I remember the "colored" drinking fountains, "whites only" restrooms, etc. People both black and white paid dearly to reverse a long held injustice, and it sickens me to see it or hear it regardless of the color of the skin of the person spewing that crap. Good riddance! Back on track. I bet this "somehow" comes back to bite OJ. With double jeopardy I don't know how, but I bet it will. Remember, I said it here. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mr2mk1g 10 #40 November 17, 2006 Would it matter if Cloudburst was black? I mean... they're allowed to use the 'N' word. I certainly rely on my Welsh connections to shamelessly take the piss out of my Welsh colleagues whilst simultaneously banning other team members from doing so... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhreeZone 20 #41 November 17, 2006 QuoteWould it matter if Cloudburst was black? Nope. Now lets carry on about the topic, not about banning of someone OJ must be thinking that the real killer will suddenly start telling him all the things that are wrong in his book and will confess. Don't you see his over all plan??? Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites StreetScooby 5 #42 November 18, 2006 Quote I certainly rely on my Welsh connections to shamelessly What do you have with 2 sheep tied to a post? A Welsh leisure centre We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #43 November 18, 2006 Quote Back on track. I bet this "somehow" comes back to bite OJ. With double jeopardy I don't know how, but I bet it will. Remember, I said it here. well, he still owes a considerable amount of money in the civil judgement, and any income to this book can't be protected the way his pensions and annuities could. To Cloudburst, who no doubt will lurk. The outrage was over an obviously guilty rich man getting off. And over the lousy ending to the spectable of this long running celebrity trial. (The only funny thing the Stanford band ever did was serenade the lawyers out of the courthouse, and then do the tribute to OJ at the Coliseum the next day) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Samurai136 0 #44 November 18, 2006 QuoteThere was a case - can't remember where/who - but a guy got away with murder (jury found him not guilty). However, a bit later, someone found some new evidence, and they tried him on perjury, civil rights violations, and something else (can't recall, again). Can any of our legal eagles here shed some light on if this is possible? I know they tried the officers in the Rodney King fiasco a second time, but it was government on goverment officials, so I'm not sure if it can apply here. It would be interesting to see if this could be done...he did it, he was found not guilty, and now he's confessing (any shrink will tell you this is a confession, similar to Bundy's "confessions" to Keppel just prior to Bundy's electocution...almost, in fact, identical). Ciels- Michele To get around the double jeopardy issue, the State of California would have to demonstrate that OJ was never in jeopardy in the original criminal trial. For example if the verdict was rigged, jury tampering, etc... etc. I think an interesting argument might be: The LA police are corrupt and tried to frame OJ for a double murder, evidence tampering, etc. This contaminated the original trial such that OJ was never in jeopardy of conviction. Please set aside the original trial and accept OJ's "confession" as a guilty plea and send him to Pelican Bay. "Buttons aren't toys." - Trillian Ken Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites likearock 2 #45 November 19, 2006 Quote That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. That's a ridiculous argument. With the sheer amount of DNA and other evidence, anyone else would have been convicted with a bowl of chili for the prosecutor. Cloudburst got it right: Quote every fucker on the jury knew he was guilty, but they decided to give white America some pay back for the Rodney King aquitals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #46 November 20, 2006 http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061120/tv_simpson_interview.html?.v=4 QuoteAP O.J. Simpson Book, TV Special Canceled Monday November 20, 3:46 pm ET News Corp. Cancels O.J. Simpson Book and TV Special NEW YORK (AP) -- After a firestorm of criticism, News. Corp. said Monday that it has canceled the O.J. Simpson book and television special "If I Did It." "I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," said Rupert Murdoch, News Corp. chairman. "We are sorry for any pain that his has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Zipp0 1 #47 November 20, 2006 I think the headline is bogus. I don't think Fox has a thing to do with the book, so they cannot cancel it. Amazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #48 November 20, 2006 QuoteI think the headline is bogus. I don't think Fox has a thing to do with the book, so they cannot cancel it. Amazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. You are right Fox doesn't have anything to do with the book. News Corp does. News Corp is not the same corporation as Fox even though Murdock owns both. Apparently a lot of the pressure came from local Fox affiliates refusing to air the show. Whatever, I'm glad they cancelled it. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #49 November 20, 2006 QuoteAmazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. DUDE.. where is my cut Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
steveorino 7 #27 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI really don’t get what the big deal is. You have a guy who killed his ex. Who was fucking some other dude who was driving his car and using his money. I can see why OJ was pissed. and he should have goon to jail, but he didnt. Do people really think this is the biggest Injustice we have in our history? It would be great if people focused there energy on more important things then celebrities. Fuck OJ fuck Nicole and the dude she was fucking. i think it's because OJ is a nigger If THAT reply won't ban you then some mods here are wusses. that's the best "forcing their hand" post i've seen in a while I'm trying -- your slang is totally without any redeeming value. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloudburst 0 #28 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI really don’t get what the big deal is. You have a guy who killed his ex. Who was fucking some other dude who was driving his car and using his money. I can see why OJ was pissed. and he should have goon to jail, but he didnt. Do people really think this is the biggest Injustice we have in our history? It would be great if people focused there energy on more important things then celebrities. Fuck OJ fuck Nicole and the dude she was fucking. i think it's because OJ is a nigger If THAT reply won't ban you then some mods here are wusses. that's the best "forcing their hand" post i've seen in a while I'm trying -- your slang is totally without any redeeming value. i know you're trying, it warms the cockles of my heart Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #29 November 17, 2006 I still think CB was calling D a racist in that reply. Which is more clearly a PA. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Cloudburst 0 #30 November 17, 2006 QuoteI still think CB was calling D a racist in that reply. Which is more clearly a PA. are you using your big wooded stirers spoon in this topic, or just a normal spoon to stir things up? "it was him" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Casurf1978 0 #31 November 17, 2006 Yeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wmw999 2,517 #32 November 17, 2006 QuoteYeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though.Anyone who buys that book is a moron. That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Cloudburst 0 #33 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteYeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though.Anyone who buys that book is a moron. That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. Wendy W. how many blacks were on the jury? and how many of those blacks wanted some payback for Rodney King? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TomAiello 26 #34 November 17, 2006 Quotei think it's because OJ is a nigger You're out of line. Please review the Forum Rules, specifically this part: QuoteWhile discussion of certain social and political issues may require the use of sensitive or potentially offensive terms, outside of those limited contexts the use of such terms is not allowed on this board and may be removed. While I can see that your subsequent posts are attempting to debate the actual issues around the usage of such terms and whether or not they ought to be deemed offensive, your first post was obviously intended to shock and offend simply by the use of an unnecessarily offensive racial epithet. I've banned you from this forum for 14 days.-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #35 November 17, 2006 Quoteare you using your big wooded stirers spoon in this topic, or just a normal spoon to stir things up? "it was him" - your pot/kettle argument is interesting (my interpretation was you weren't racist, just calling someone else one - else you wouldn't have quoted the whole post and then summed it up so succinctly) in any case, it's not a stirrer - it's more of a pasta wand with drain bit in the back and tines - looks kind of like the head of venus fly trap when open OJ is an ass for writing and promoting this book - and that's true guilty or innocent. anyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #36 November 17, 2006 Quoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #37 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. so according to this thread, then OJ must think the suspect is a golfer? so the cops and feds just gave up? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #38 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. so according to this thread, then OJ must think the suspect is a golfer? so the cops and feds just gave up? Well, since OJ found him, why bother? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites steveorino 7 #39 November 17, 2006 QuoteYou're out of line ... I've banned you from this forum for 14 days. GOOD! I'm too old to see or hear that term in any other light other than that from my youth. Growing up in Texas in 50s & 60s I remember the "colored" drinking fountains, "whites only" restrooms, etc. People both black and white paid dearly to reverse a long held injustice, and it sickens me to see it or hear it regardless of the color of the skin of the person spewing that crap. Good riddance! Back on track. I bet this "somehow" comes back to bite OJ. With double jeopardy I don't know how, but I bet it will. Remember, I said it here. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mr2mk1g 10 #40 November 17, 2006 Would it matter if Cloudburst was black? I mean... they're allowed to use the 'N' word. I certainly rely on my Welsh connections to shamelessly take the piss out of my Welsh colleagues whilst simultaneously banning other team members from doing so... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhreeZone 20 #41 November 17, 2006 QuoteWould it matter if Cloudburst was black? Nope. Now lets carry on about the topic, not about banning of someone OJ must be thinking that the real killer will suddenly start telling him all the things that are wrong in his book and will confess. Don't you see his over all plan??? Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites StreetScooby 5 #42 November 18, 2006 Quote I certainly rely on my Welsh connections to shamelessly What do you have with 2 sheep tied to a post? A Welsh leisure centre We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #43 November 18, 2006 Quote Back on track. I bet this "somehow" comes back to bite OJ. With double jeopardy I don't know how, but I bet it will. Remember, I said it here. well, he still owes a considerable amount of money in the civil judgement, and any income to this book can't be protected the way his pensions and annuities could. To Cloudburst, who no doubt will lurk. The outrage was over an obviously guilty rich man getting off. And over the lousy ending to the spectable of this long running celebrity trial. (The only funny thing the Stanford band ever did was serenade the lawyers out of the courthouse, and then do the tribute to OJ at the Coliseum the next day) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Samurai136 0 #44 November 18, 2006 QuoteThere was a case - can't remember where/who - but a guy got away with murder (jury found him not guilty). However, a bit later, someone found some new evidence, and they tried him on perjury, civil rights violations, and something else (can't recall, again). Can any of our legal eagles here shed some light on if this is possible? I know they tried the officers in the Rodney King fiasco a second time, but it was government on goverment officials, so I'm not sure if it can apply here. It would be interesting to see if this could be done...he did it, he was found not guilty, and now he's confessing (any shrink will tell you this is a confession, similar to Bundy's "confessions" to Keppel just prior to Bundy's electocution...almost, in fact, identical). Ciels- Michele To get around the double jeopardy issue, the State of California would have to demonstrate that OJ was never in jeopardy in the original criminal trial. For example if the verdict was rigged, jury tampering, etc... etc. I think an interesting argument might be: The LA police are corrupt and tried to frame OJ for a double murder, evidence tampering, etc. This contaminated the original trial such that OJ was never in jeopardy of conviction. Please set aside the original trial and accept OJ's "confession" as a guilty plea and send him to Pelican Bay. "Buttons aren't toys." - Trillian Ken Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites likearock 2 #45 November 19, 2006 Quote That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. That's a ridiculous argument. With the sheer amount of DNA and other evidence, anyone else would have been convicted with a bowl of chili for the prosecutor. Cloudburst got it right: Quote every fucker on the jury knew he was guilty, but they decided to give white America some pay back for the Rodney King aquitals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #46 November 20, 2006 http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061120/tv_simpson_interview.html?.v=4 QuoteAP O.J. Simpson Book, TV Special Canceled Monday November 20, 3:46 pm ET News Corp. Cancels O.J. Simpson Book and TV Special NEW YORK (AP) -- After a firestorm of criticism, News. Corp. said Monday that it has canceled the O.J. Simpson book and television special "If I Did It." "I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," said Rupert Murdoch, News Corp. chairman. "We are sorry for any pain that his has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Zipp0 1 #47 November 20, 2006 I think the headline is bogus. I don't think Fox has a thing to do with the book, so they cannot cancel it. Amazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #48 November 20, 2006 QuoteI think the headline is bogus. I don't think Fox has a thing to do with the book, so they cannot cancel it. Amazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. You are right Fox doesn't have anything to do with the book. News Corp does. News Corp is not the same corporation as Fox even though Murdock owns both. Apparently a lot of the pressure came from local Fox affiliates refusing to air the show. Whatever, I'm glad they cancelled it. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #49 November 20, 2006 QuoteAmazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. DUDE.. where is my cut Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
rehmwa 2 #29 November 17, 2006 I still think CB was calling D a racist in that reply. Which is more clearly a PA. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloudburst 0 #30 November 17, 2006 QuoteI still think CB was calling D a racist in that reply. Which is more clearly a PA. are you using your big wooded stirers spoon in this topic, or just a normal spoon to stir things up? "it was him" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casurf1978 0 #31 November 17, 2006 Yeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,517 #32 November 17, 2006 QuoteYeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though.Anyone who buys that book is a moron. That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloudburst 0 #33 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteYeah it is. I dont know who is worse. OJ is already a scum, but Fox for pursuing this. I feel sorry for Nicole's family though.Anyone who buys that book is a moron. That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. Wendy W. how many blacks were on the jury? and how many of those blacks wanted some payback for Rodney King? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomAiello 26 #34 November 17, 2006 Quotei think it's because OJ is a nigger You're out of line. Please review the Forum Rules, specifically this part: QuoteWhile discussion of certain social and political issues may require the use of sensitive or potentially offensive terms, outside of those limited contexts the use of such terms is not allowed on this board and may be removed. While I can see that your subsequent posts are attempting to debate the actual issues around the usage of such terms and whether or not they ought to be deemed offensive, your first post was obviously intended to shock and offend simply by the use of an unnecessarily offensive racial epithet. I've banned you from this forum for 14 days.-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #35 November 17, 2006 Quoteare you using your big wooded stirers spoon in this topic, or just a normal spoon to stir things up? "it was him" - your pot/kettle argument is interesting (my interpretation was you weren't racist, just calling someone else one - else you wouldn't have quoted the whole post and then summed it up so succinctly) in any case, it's not a stirrer - it's more of a pasta wand with drain bit in the back and tines - looks kind of like the head of venus fly trap when open OJ is an ass for writing and promoting this book - and that's true guilty or innocent. anyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #36 November 17, 2006 Quoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #37 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. so according to this thread, then OJ must think the suspect is a golfer? so the cops and feds just gave up? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #38 November 17, 2006 QuoteQuoteQuoteanyone - since OJ was found "not guilty" . did they ever catch anyone else for the murders? I don't recall I believe OJ is still searching for the Real Killer. so according to this thread, then OJ must think the suspect is a golfer? so the cops and feds just gave up? Well, since OJ found him, why bother? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #39 November 17, 2006 QuoteYou're out of line ... I've banned you from this forum for 14 days. GOOD! I'm too old to see or hear that term in any other light other than that from my youth. Growing up in Texas in 50s & 60s I remember the "colored" drinking fountains, "whites only" restrooms, etc. People both black and white paid dearly to reverse a long held injustice, and it sickens me to see it or hear it regardless of the color of the skin of the person spewing that crap. Good riddance! Back on track. I bet this "somehow" comes back to bite OJ. With double jeopardy I don't know how, but I bet it will. Remember, I said it here. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr2mk1g 10 #40 November 17, 2006 Would it matter if Cloudburst was black? I mean... they're allowed to use the 'N' word. I certainly rely on my Welsh connections to shamelessly take the piss out of my Welsh colleagues whilst simultaneously banning other team members from doing so... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #41 November 17, 2006 QuoteWould it matter if Cloudburst was black? Nope. Now lets carry on about the topic, not about banning of someone OJ must be thinking that the real killer will suddenly start telling him all the things that are wrong in his book and will confess. Don't you see his over all plan??? Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #42 November 18, 2006 Quote I certainly rely on my Welsh connections to shamelessly What do you have with 2 sheep tied to a post? A Welsh leisure centre We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #43 November 18, 2006 Quote Back on track. I bet this "somehow" comes back to bite OJ. With double jeopardy I don't know how, but I bet it will. Remember, I said it here. well, he still owes a considerable amount of money in the civil judgement, and any income to this book can't be protected the way his pensions and annuities could. To Cloudburst, who no doubt will lurk. The outrage was over an obviously guilty rich man getting off. And over the lousy ending to the spectable of this long running celebrity trial. (The only funny thing the Stanford band ever did was serenade the lawyers out of the courthouse, and then do the tribute to OJ at the Coliseum the next day) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Samurai136 0 #44 November 18, 2006 QuoteThere was a case - can't remember where/who - but a guy got away with murder (jury found him not guilty). However, a bit later, someone found some new evidence, and they tried him on perjury, civil rights violations, and something else (can't recall, again). Can any of our legal eagles here shed some light on if this is possible? I know they tried the officers in the Rodney King fiasco a second time, but it was government on goverment officials, so I'm not sure if it can apply here. It would be interesting to see if this could be done...he did it, he was found not guilty, and now he's confessing (any shrink will tell you this is a confession, similar to Bundy's "confessions" to Keppel just prior to Bundy's electocution...almost, in fact, identical). Ciels- Michele To get around the double jeopardy issue, the State of California would have to demonstrate that OJ was never in jeopardy in the original criminal trial. For example if the verdict was rigged, jury tampering, etc... etc. I think an interesting argument might be: The LA police are corrupt and tried to frame OJ for a double murder, evidence tampering, etc. This contaminated the original trial such that OJ was never in jeopardy of conviction. Please set aside the original trial and accept OJ's "confession" as a guilty plea and send him to Pelican Bay. "Buttons aren't toys." - Trillian Ken Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #45 November 19, 2006 Quote That said, I've heard more than one lawyer say that yes, OJ is guilty, but the prosecutor fucked up and didn't prove it adequately. The jury can't find him guilty just because he's a scumbag (which he is). They have to find him guilty because the evidence the prosecution presented proved it. That's a ridiculous argument. With the sheer amount of DNA and other evidence, anyone else would have been convicted with a bowl of chili for the prosecutor. Cloudburst got it right: Quote every fucker on the jury knew he was guilty, but they decided to give white America some pay back for the Rodney King aquitals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #46 November 20, 2006 http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061120/tv_simpson_interview.html?.v=4 QuoteAP O.J. Simpson Book, TV Special Canceled Monday November 20, 3:46 pm ET News Corp. Cancels O.J. Simpson Book and TV Special NEW YORK (AP) -- After a firestorm of criticism, News. Corp. said Monday that it has canceled the O.J. Simpson book and television special "If I Did It." "I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," said Rupert Murdoch, News Corp. chairman. "We are sorry for any pain that his has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #47 November 20, 2006 I think the headline is bogus. I don't think Fox has a thing to do with the book, so they cannot cancel it. Amazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #48 November 20, 2006 QuoteI think the headline is bogus. I don't think Fox has a thing to do with the book, so they cannot cancel it. Amazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. You are right Fox doesn't have anything to do with the book. News Corp does. News Corp is not the same corporation as Fox even though Murdock owns both. Apparently a lot of the pressure came from local Fox affiliates refusing to air the show. Whatever, I'm glad they cancelled it. - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #49 November 20, 2006 QuoteAmazon has taken thousands and thousands of pre-orders. DUDE.. where is my cut Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
