0
JohnRich

England: Gun Crime still Rising

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

And what's really ironic, is that as vehemently as kallend argues against guns here, he as several times in other threads in the past indicated that he is actually pro-gun ownership. So, he's actually a contributor to all these horrible problems in society that he blames on guns, while at the same time arguing against them.

Go figure...



If you actually paid attention, I do NOT argue against guns. I argue against the lie that arming society makes it safer.



It's a lie, but you STILL can't explain why violent crime is still below the nat'l average in carry states.



Funny how Florida has 40% more violent crimes than Illinois and more than double the rate of Wisconsin, then. "May issue" states like NY and NJ are also below FL and TX.

I think you should take a good look at the FBI UCR for last year.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh, yay!! Can I cherry-pick info, too?

Murder rates per 100k for 2005

1. Compton, Calif. 67.1
2. Gary, Ind. 58.0
3. Birmingham, Ala. 44.3
4. Youngstown, Ohio 43.7
5. Richmond, Va. 43.0
6. Baltimore, Md. 42.0
7. Camden, N.J. 41.2
8. Flint, Mich. 40.1
9. Detroit, Mich. 39.3
10. Richmond, Calif. 38.8

NY chimes in at #21, FL shows up until #25 ... Texas doesn't show up until #45. We can see MD and NJ are already in the Top Ten.

D.C. - that enlightened liberal enclave that it is... #13. And, as usual, looks like inner-city crime accounts for a lot of it - I wonder what the rates would be if you could filter out gang on gang violence?

Once again, doesn't seem to be the law-abiding folks causing the problems - but of course, some of us already knew that.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh, yay!! Can I cherry-pick info, too?

Murder rates per 100k for 2005

1. Compton, Calif. 67.1
2. Gary, Ind. 58.0
3. Birmingham, Ala. 44.3
4. Youngstown, Ohio 43.7
5. Richmond, Va. 43.0
6. Baltimore, Md. 42.0
7. Camden, N.J. 41.2
8. Flint, Mich. 40.1
9. Detroit, Mich. 39.3
10. Richmond, Calif. 38.8

NY chimes in at #21, FL shows up until #25 ... Texas doesn't show up until #45. We can see MD and NJ are already in the Top Ten.

D.C. - that enlightened liberal enclave that it is... #13. And, as usual, looks like inner-city crime accounts for a lot of it - I wonder what the rates would be if you could filter out gang on gang violence?

Once again, doesn't seem to be the law-abiding folks causing the problems - but of course, some of us already knew that.



So these cities are now states? :D:D Make up your mind what you are talking about.

PS last time I checked, Birmingham was in AL, a CCW state. In fact 6 of your top ten are in "shall issue" states, and the other four in "may issue".
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cali may as well be NO issue - unless you're Barbara Boxer or selected others. D.C., which is NO issue, has a rate of 35.4. MD and NJ are both no issue, as I recall.

Looks like not having guns isn't much of an affect on crime.

BTW... DC's violent crime rate? 1371.2/100k, per 2004 UCR data - yup, it's the guns, all right!

I'm almost off work, but I'm compiling data and will re-visit when I'm back at work Monday morning.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Cali may as well be NO issue - unless you're Barbara Boxer or selected others. D.C., which is NO issue, has a rate of 35.4. MD and NJ are both no issue, as I recall.

Looks like not having guns isn't much of an affect on crime.

BTW... DC's violent crime rate? 1371.2/100k, per 2004 UCR data - yup, it's the guns, all right!

I'm almost off work, but I'm compiling data and will re-visit when I'm back at work Monday morning.



NJ and MD are "may issue" states according to packing.org

You are VERY inconsistent, switching ("cherry picking") between cities and states as suits your purpose. DC clearly suffers from the fact that it's just a 2 minute drive from "shall issue" Virginia.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And you have valid proof that all those deaths are due to handguns, as you keep arguing...



Varies from year to year, but typically 75 -85% of gun homicides are committed with handguns in the USA (FBI UCR).

If you exclude the US handgun homicides, the US homicide rate is remarkably similar to the homicide rate in Canada, Australia, and England.

Here's an interesting read.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



It's a lie, but you STILL can't explain why violent crime is still below the nat'l average in carry states.



Here you go, Sunshine:

2005 data from the FBI:

Homicide rate per 100,000 in "NO CARRY" states - 4.85
Homicide rate per 100,000 in USA overall - 5.6

Violent crime rate per 100,000 in NO CARRY states - 436
Violent crime rate per 100,000 USA overall - 469

NO CARRY states as defined by packing.org - a pro-gun web site.


Looks to me like your statement is untrue. (NCClimber would, I guess, call it a lie).
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


The NRA and cronies repeatedly goes on about how "law abiding gun owners" and legal guns are not responsible for the gun crimes. It is obviously a garbage argument since, by your own admission earlier in this thread, almost every illegal gun started out as a legal gun in the hands of a law-abiding owner and somehow by the actions of that owner (whether deliberate or due to carelessness) made the transition to illegal status. And every criminal with a gun was once a law abiding citizen.



I made no such admission - I pointed out numerous methods for *criminals* to obtain weapons, some of which included illegal smuggling. I made no attempt to quantify by source. You, otoh, have attempted to conclude without evidence that all guns were legally obtained. It's the same sort of shoddy reasoning that has a handful of gun shops blamed for supplying all criminals. They happen to be the ones selling the greatest volume.

It's either tragic or facetious for you to call victims of burglary careless. It is not a crime to be robbed.

And to say everyone is born a law abiding citizen is silly. Only in other countries do people start out life in an inferior caste. But yes, you're correct. Britney Spears's children, who undoubtably will rival the cast of the Different Strokes for criminal behavior, are currently law abiding citizens, at least to the best of their abilities. I don't think you can fault the kid for riding in the car outside of the child seat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


The NRA and cronies repeatedly goes on about how "law abiding gun owners" and legal guns are not responsible for the gun crimes. It is obviously a garbage argument since, by your own admission earlier in this thread, almost every illegal gun started out as a legal gun in the hands of a law-abiding owner and somehow by the actions of that owner (whether deliberate or due to carelessness) made the transition to illegal status. And every criminal with a gun was once a law abiding citizen.



I made no such admission - I pointed out numerous methods for *criminals* to obtain weapons, some of which included illegal smuggling. I made no attempt to quantify by source. You, otoh, have attempted to conclude without evidence that all guns were legally obtained.

Quote



I was careful to say no such thing.:P




It's the same sort of shoddy reasoning that has a handful of gun shops blamed for supplying all criminals. They happen to be the ones selling the greatest volume.

It's either tragic or facetious for you to call victims of burglary careless. It is not a crime to be robbed.

And to say everyone is born a law abiding citizen is silly. Only in other countries do people start out life in an inferior caste. But yes, you're correct. Britney Spears's children, who undoubtably will rival the cast of the Different Strokes for criminal behavior, are currently law abiding citizens, at least to the best of their abilities. I don't think you can fault the kid for riding in the car outside of the child seat.



Every single criminal in history was once a law abiding person. And the illegal guns that criminals use for the most part started out as legal guns in the hands of "law abiding citizens" who were either not as law abiding as they like to claim, or negligently allowed their guns to fall into criminal hands.

You might want to read THIS from the US Dept. of Justice. Over 340,000 guns are stolen in the US every year. That is disgraceful lack of care on the part of gun owners.


It also points out that the actual number of times guns are used in defense by crime victims is way way less than is claimed by the NRA and its cronies.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Are there no laws on firearm storage in the states? Over here in Blighty weapons have, at the very least, to be kept in a locked steel cabinet.



Interesting topic. If you own a model rocket motor with more than 62 grams (about 2 ounces) of propellant you HAVE to store it in a locked magazine of government approved design, with a government approved lock.

You can keep your loaded gun under the pillow though, so the burglars can find it easily.

Over 300,000 guns are stolen annually in the US - I *believe* guns are the second favorite items after money for thieves. Despite this many gun owners show negligence in securing their weapons against theft. The NRA and its cronies then whine that it's illegal guns that are the problem and criminals will always get guns. OF COURSE THEY BLOODY WELL WILL when gun owners make it so easy for them.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Are there no laws on firearm storage in the states? Over here in Blighty weapons have, at the very least, to be kept in a locked steel cabinet.



It depends on where you live. Here in the US we have a patchwork of laws on just about any issue related to guns, except the ones that really matter, like murder and assault by pointing being illegal.

In most places there is no requirement to store your firearms any certain way. The places that have the most gun control, like Washington DC, have requirements that guns be disassembled, locked, separate from ammunition, and so on.

There is one interesting thing to remember. England has a far higher violent crime rate, and a higher overall crime rate than the US. The one place the US far outstrips the UK is in homicides. While far more brits, scots, irish, etc will be victims of a serious crime, the number of Americans killed per population is higher.

It is something that is written about and studied every year, but one of those sociological conundrums that is never adequately explained. One thing to remember is that most of the murders here are committed by felons against felons. Another important consideration is that most criminals here avoid contact with their victim liike that plague. Things like home invasion and robbery are more rare here.

As for kallend's comments about criminals stealing guns, you have to remember that with more than 200 million guns in the country, they are probably the most commonly owned item of value after jewelry and small electronics. He is also incorrect, as more burlars aim for jewelry and personal electronics than firearms.

The last comment I'm going to make is about the choice of how to store firearms. Different guns have different uses, though many overlap. Some are ment by their owner to be used for self defense. In that case, it must be accessible, and locking it in a steel case in the livingroom renders it useless. Just as our right to self defense is recognized here (in most places) our right to choose what to use for self defense and how to store it is also respected. For now.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Cali may as well be NO issue - unless you're Barbara Boxer or selected others. D.C., which is NO issue, has a rate of 35.4. MD and NJ are both no issue, as I recall.

Looks like not having guns isn't much of an affect on crime.

BTW... DC's violent crime rate? 1371.2/100k, per 2004 UCR data - yup, it's the guns, all right!

I'm almost off work, but I'm compiling data and will re-visit when I'm back at work Monday morning.



NJ and MD are "may issue" states according to packing.org

You are VERY inconsistent, switching ("cherry picking") between cities and states as suits your purpose. DC clearly suffers from the fact that it's just a 2 minute drive from "shall issue" Virginia.



As you do, when we talk about a decade or more of time and you cherry-pick ONE YEAR to try to claim that it doesn't work.

As for DC violence being from guns coming from VA... first, you're going to have to provide proof other than a press conference, and second, if it were the GUNS, then VA would be just as violent and it's NOT.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Are there no laws on firearm storage in the states? Over here in Blighty weapons have, at the very least, to be kept in a locked steel cabinet.



It depends on where you live. Here in the US we have a patchwork of laws on just about any issue related to guns, except the ones that really matter, like murder and assault by pointing being illegal.

In most places there is no requirement to store your firearms any certain way. The places that have the most gun control, like Washington DC, have requirements that guns be disassembled, locked, separate from ammunition, and so on.

Interesting. I know that the US is a federal system with lots of powers reserved to states rather than central government, but is there any simple reason why some states impose (and presumably, the population support) such vastly more stringent rules? What's the rationale? Your Washington DC example makes me curious because, AFAIK, not even British rules require weapons to be disassembled in storage.

Quote

There is one interesting thing to remember. England has a far higher violent crime rate, and a higher overall crime rate than the US. The one place the US far outstrips the UK is in homicides. While far more brits, scots, irish, etc will be victims of a serious crime, the number of Americans killed per population is higher.

It is something that is written about and studied every year, but one of those sociological conundrums that is never adequately explained. One thing to remember is that most of the murders here are committed by felons against felons. Another important consideration is that most criminals here avoid contact with their victim liike that plague. Things like home invasion and robbery are more rare here.

As for kallend's comments about criminals stealing guns, you have to remember that with more than 200 million guns in the country, they are probably the most commonly owned item of value after jewelry and small electronics. He is also incorrect, as more burlars aim for jewelry and personal electronics than firearms.

Not being conversant with the relevant data at the moment, I'm not going to argue with this.

Quote

The last comment I'm going to make is about the choice of how to store firearms. Different guns have different uses, though many overlap. Some are ment by their owner to be used for self defense. In that case, it must be accessible, and locking it in a steel case in the livingroom renders it useless.

I take this point. Just out of interest, do decent statistics exist on the reasons given for owning weapons? Self-defence vs sport vs hunting vs pest control/agriculture etc?

Quote

Just as our right to self defense is recognized here (in most places) our right to choose what to use for self defense and how to store it is also respected. For now.

Torn whether or not to respond to this, seeing as your implication seems to be that the right to self-defence is not respected in other countries (i.e. the UK). This would be a mistaken implication. The right to self-defence is enshrined in British law and has been posted at length elsewhere on this board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You are VERY inconsistent



Inconsistent? :o

You mean like:
Quote

If you are trying to make a point, the burden is on you to provide supporting evidence, not on me.

Want to make a point, then YOU provide the data.



and

Quote

You can look it up for yourself like I did - the data are all in the public domain. Just takes a little WORK. You can do it!


or
Quote

Sucks to have to do your own research, doesn't it?



It puts this Kallend post in context.
Quote

I am a role model and mentor for young people who want to lead productive lives

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



As you do, when we talk about a decade or more of time and you cherry-pick ONE YEAR to try to claim that it doesn't work.

.



Supply the data to prove your point. I provided THE MOST RECENT FBI DATA and PROVED mine.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You are VERY inconsistent



Inconsistent? :o

You mean like:
Quote

If you are trying to make a point, the burden is on you to provide supporting evidence, not on me.

Want to make a point, then YOU provide the data.



and

Quote

You can look it up for yourself like I did - the data are all in the public domain. Just takes a little WORK. You can do it!


or
Quote

Sucks to have to do your own research, doesn't it?



It puts this Kallend post in context.
Quote

I am a role model and mentor for young people who want to lead productive lives



Being a role model for young people does not include doing their homework for them, Sunshine. You want to make a point, you provide your own data.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


You're just pissed because I PROVED my point by supplying actual FACTS rather than NRA myths, and you can't contradict them.



This is bullshit!!! You did not supply the "actual facts". You merely claimed that had been posted at some time in the past.



What reality are you living in?

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2651942#2651942
www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2651736#2651736

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2653137#2653137
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Being a role model for young people does not include doing their homework for them, Sunshine. You want to make a point, you provide your own data.



True, but I think most people think good role models should demonstrate favorable characteristics like honesty, straightforwardness, fair-mindedness and be willing to admit when they are in the wrong (instead of twisting the discussion whenever those errors are exposed).

Role Models...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Being a role model for young people does not include doing their homework for them, Sunshine. You want to make a point, you provide your own data.



True, but I think most people think good role models should demonstrate favorable characteristics like honesty, straightforwardness, fair-mindedness and be willing to admit when they are in the wrong (instead of twisting the discussion whenever those errors are exposed).

Role Models...



So you're now admitting you are wrong about the facts I supplied?

I have yet to see any data supplied by you, just sniping and whining.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



There is one interesting thing to remember. England has a far higher violent crime rate, and a higher overall crime rate than the US. The one place the US far outstrips the UK is in homicides. While far more brits, scots, irish, etc will be victims of a serious crime, the number of Americans killed per population is higher.



1. What do you mean by FAR higher?

2. You have data to PROVE it?

3. If it's true, then the argument that the US has a culture of violence that accounts for its higher homicide rate is clearly false.

4. You need to be less confused about who you are talking about; is it England, Scotland, Ireland, Britain or the UK?

Edited to add -

In 2004, the US Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics released “Cross-National Studies in Crime and Justice,” which not only examined what might be responsible for the decline in U.S. crime rates but also put the U.S. crime rate in an international context, comparing U.S. data with that from England and Wales, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Scotland, Sweden and Switzerland.

It found that following a reduction since the mid 1990s, "crime now occurs in the United States with about the same frequency as in England and Wales".


The DoJ also wrote "The falling rates of crime in the United States most consistently were related to the aging of the population, falling unemployment rates, and rising risk of punishment by the justice system." NOTHING there about CCW laws changing.

Lest you have forgotten, the DoJ in 2004 was headed by the conservative Ashcroft. Violent crime and homicides both increased in the US in 2005 (FBI UCR). 2006 data are not yet available from the FBI although the preliminary report indicates another INCREASE.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0