0
steveorino

No desires unless satisfaction for said desires exist

Recommended Posts

Ok, I've given some thought to a serious reply so here goes....

Man, or any other creature, does not come into this world with any desires, only instincts. A newborn baby has no desire to suckle until after it has followed it's instincts, suckled once, and learned that it feels better afterwards. From that point on feeding becomes less instinct and more desire as the child grows.
Another example is newly hatched chicks. They have no desire to follow a hen around, but instead enter the world with the instinct to attach themselves to the first thing they see, which in nature is usually their mother. At that time instinct is replaced with a desire to follow her because good things happen when the chick does follow her.
This is not to say that these instincts need to be satisfied at birth or even at all. Billions of chicks are hatched and raised each year having never seen a mature chicken, let alone their mother.
If we turn the question around and ask, "If a satisfaction exists, will a creature be born with a desire for it?" I would lean strongly towards no. So, accordingly, I would say that creatures are not born with desires at all, regardless of whether a satisfaction for them exists.

That's enough deep thought for one day. Now I got a freakin' headache.:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. Is that true? Please explain your answer if possible.



So at the end of the day then, aren't you just talking about instinctive urges?

Food, drink, sex and power.

It's probably misleading to put sex third, because the first two let you survive and grow till you're big enough to have sex and the last one gets you more sex the more you have of it.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

Now, as to that creature (birds, for example) it of course was born with that desire because it is in it's nature to do so.



How do you know that the bird desires to fly anymore than I desire something I can do but don't?
"That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

  Quote

Now, as to that creature (birds, for example) it of course was born with that desire because it is in it's nature to do so.



How do you know that the bird desires to fly anymore than I desire something I can do but don't?



Now that's an interesting point.

If a bird desires to fly, does a fish desire to swim? Does a wolf desire to run? Does a rabbit desire to dig?

Do they all simply desire to survive and procreate and have it hardwired into their minds that this is the best way to do so.

In this context, what does desire mean?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Man was NOT BORN with a desire to fly. The desire to fly came
>from man observing a creature who could fly.

As others have said, we had a desire to go to the moon, and we did it. We never observed any creatures going to the moon - but we still desired to do it.

Many cultures have developed musical instruments and come up with their own unique style of playing them. The pioneers of these instruments did not observe a bear playing an instrument; through their own ingenuity, they created a new way to make a pleasing noise.

Many scientists have desired to know things that are unknown - and often they accomplish their goal. Einstein was not emulating the previous guy who came up with the concept of matter-energy equivalence; it was an unknown, but one he came to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>born born born ... everyone is missing that word in my statement.
>No, man was NOT "born" with a desire to fly or go to the moon.

Your original statement:

"Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists."

Are you talking about the first few moments out of the womb?

If so, some babies are born with a strong will to live (as evinced by their avoidance of pain etc) but quickly die due to birth defects. I would consider them to have a desire to live, but that satisfaction cannot come to pass because of the physical defects of their bodies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've decided not to play ...

Too many twist of semantics. I guess I should have worked on the wording before I posted. We are BORN with a desire to live and LIVING is something that can be satisfied by humans.

The exception seems to be the rule here, so let's move on to another philosophical discussion. My bad. :P

steveOrino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

I've decided not to play ...

Too many twist of semantics. I guess I should have worked on the wording before I posted. We are BORN with a desire to live and LIVING is something that can be satisfied by humans.

The exception seems to be the rule here, so let's move on to another philosophical discussion. My bad. :P



No, please! You can't leave my questions dangling - I want to know how this discussion was supposed to go!

(Unless I nailed it with my last post, in which case, yay me!:P)
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

yeah, you won! ;) You kids can play, I just put the question up without thinking about the semantic word games that go on intentionally or unintentionally. Besides I have so many of Hairy Juan's post on another thread to read ... not! ;)



Woohoo, I shall give myself a lollipop to celebrate!



(Bwaahaahaa, hairyjuan:D:D)
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. Is that true? Please explain your answer if possible.



If that were true then how could you desire something unless you have first experienced it? Why would you go out of your way to experience it unless you had the desire to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

yeah, you won! ;) You kids can play, I just put the question up without thinking about the semantic word games that go on intentionally or unintentionally. Besides I have so many of Hairy Juan's post on another thread to read ... not! ;)



Well, normally you can put together a lemma like this and not many people will argue with you. But when you use it back in the context of the principle proposition you were thinking about, people who don't agree will set out to show why your lemma really doesn't work as well as you thought it did.

While you haven't stated your intentions regarding your original question, consciously or otherwise, people have apparently seen into the future of this discussion. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0