Recommended Posts
kallend 2,106
Did you have to pull your socks off for that calc?
Or were you already wearing sandals?
(unless you wear socks with sandals)![]()
How are you today John?
I'm fine, thanks

How 'bout you, Randy?
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
What do you mean by "direct". Either he was involved or he wasn't. The evidence indicates very clearly that he was involved.
Still waiting on a link that shows his involvement in covering up the My Lai Massacre.
Please tell me where the statement below excludes non-combat fatalities!
"Well, it is a fact that in Gulf War I, 38% of British fatalities were killed by US forces."
kallend 2,106
What do you mean by "direct". Either he was involved or he wasn't. The evidence indicates very clearly that he was involved.
Still waiting on a link that shows his involvement in covering up the My Lai Massacre.
Please tell me where the statement below excludes non-combat fatalities!"Well, it is a fact that in Gulf War I, 38% of British fatalities were killed by US forces."
Well, I expect a lot of Brits were killed in traffic accidents in London that week too. Do you want to include those to make the US "friendly" fire numbers look even better?
All you are doing here is emphasizing over and over that the US forces have a miserable record of killing their allies. 9/24 of the British KIA in GF1. Good job, NCc.
Here's another one for you to ponder.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Well, I expect a lot of Brits were killed in traffic accidents in London that week too. Do you want to include those to make the US "friendly" fire numbers look even better?
you're a slippery one.



All you are doing here is emphasizing over and over that the US forces have a miserable record of killing their allies. 9/24 of the British KIA in GF1.
Or we could tweak it the other way and make this about the number on incidents of US on UK troops....
What's that? One? A miserable record indeed.
As far as I'm concerned it was a tragedy that the US military should completely own up to. Trying to use it a single event to portray the US as having "a miserable record of killing their allies" is pretty low brow, as well as misleading.
kallend 2,106
Well, I expect a lot of Brits were killed in traffic accidents in London that week too. Do you want to include those to make the US "friendly" fire numbers look even better?
you're a slippery one.![]()
All you are doing here is emphasizing over and over that the US forces have a miserable record of killing their allies. 9/24 of the British KIA in GF1.
Or we could tweak it the other way and make this about the number on incidents of US on UK troops....
What's that? One? A miserable record indeed.
As far as I'm concerned it was a tragedy that the US military should completely own up to. Trying to use it a single event to portray the US as having "a miserable record of killing their allies" is pretty low brow, as well as misleading.
Well, the bombing of Hiroshima was just one incident too. I guess we shouldn't count the dead.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Still waiting on a link showing how Colin Powell covered up the My Lai massacre.
kallend 2,106
You're a slippery one.
Still waiting on a link showing how Colin Powell covered up the My Lai massacre.
Failed to cover it up would be more accurate. The Pentagon's attempt failed. I never claimed it succeeded, that's you trying to muddy the waters.
Still waiting or your PROOF that Pelosi said "I want my jet"
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
And still you've repeatedly dodged my requests to provide evidence that Colin Powell tried to cover up the massacre. SSDD
Still waiting or your PROOF that Pelosi said "I want my jet"
It was sarcastic hyperbole, based on what was being incorrectly claimed by some GOP knotheads. Sorry you missed that.
Or were you already wearing sandals?
(unless you wear socks with sandals)
How are you today John?
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites