0
JohnnyD

The Congressional Bitch Slap

Recommended Posts

I still don't see the scandal of this. The federal prosecutors are Presidential appointees. They can be dismissed at anytime, for any reason.

It happened under previous administrations too.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems to be about a four year appointment with a mass turnover with administrations - all new appointments subject to senate approval. Problem here is prosecutors are being replaced purely for political reasons and without senate approval. I guess they're pretty pissed they got left out as evidenced by the 94-2 vote. Pretty hypocritical for them to cry about judicial activism and then do this. Instead of legislating from the bench, they legislate from the bar (or fire you if you don't comply). Pretty crappy all in all, but Al G. has done far, far, far worse. If this takes him away, its a good end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I still don't see the scandal of this. The federal prosecutors are Presidential appointees. They can be dismissed at anytime, for any reason.

It happened under previous administrations too.



A bunch of the pissed-off senators were GOP. Maybe they know something you don't. It was a very lopsided vote.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>It happened under previous administrations too.

Incorrect. Prosecutors have been dismissed en masse previously at the beginning of an administration; they have not been replaced selectively to abort specific investigations or punish prosecutors for not toeing the adminstration's line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>It happened under previous administrations too.

Incorrect. Prosecutors have been dismissed en masse previously at the beginning of an administration; they have not been replaced selectively to abort specific investigations or punish prosecutors for not toeing the adminstration's line.



It still doesn't matter. It is the perogative of the President. There is no scandal. President Carter did it to a guy mid-term. It happened under President Clinton too. There is no scandal here. The Congressional vote is simply guys refusing to grow a pair and move to real business.

Congress, since the election, has consistently side-stepped real work to focus on discrediting a leader whom no one is running against in 2008. :S
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I still don't see the scandal of this. The federal prosecutors are Presidential appointees. They can be dismissed at anytime, for any reason.

It happened under previous administrations too.



A bunch of the pissed-off senators were GOP. Maybe they know something you don't. It was a very lopsided vote.



The vote was to close a loophole in the Patriot Act to remove the AG's ability to appoint temporary prosecutors without Senatorial oversight.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>It happened under previous administrations too.

Incorrect. Prosecutors have been dismissed en masse previously at the beginning of an administration; they have not been replaced selectively to abort specific investigations or punish prosecutors for not toeing the adminstration's line.



It still doesn't matter. It is the perogative of the President. There is no scandal. President Carter did it to a guy mid-term. It happened under President Clinton too. There is no scandal here. The Congressional vote is simply guys refusing to grow a pair and move to real business.

Congress, since the election, has consistently side-stepped real work to focus on discrediting a leader whom no one is running against in 2008. :S



You may think that there is no scandal here.

Will you feel the same way in 2014 if a Democratic president decides to do the same thing, the same way, for the same reasons?

The majority of the people who keep up on current events realize that this is a scandal. A major scandal. One that reaches up into the top levels of the Bush administration. One that is a clear demonstration of serious ethical shortcomings, at best. The facts of how these firings happened are pretty sickening.

Do you honestly believe that firing Lamm was an appropriate action?
Do you know who I am talking about?
Do you know what she accomplished?
Do you know what her firing greatly impeded?

Now that the Republicans aren't in control of Congress anymore, you are beginning to see real checks and balances in action. If you haven't been around for a long time and lived through several administrations, you likely aren't used to it. Contrary to recent history, Congress is not supposed to be a "rubber stamp" for the President. You might want to brush up your civics knowlege and read the US constitution yourself. It is a fascinating document. The Founding Fathers were very amazing people.

Holding a Presidential administration to account for their methods of government is EXACTLY what Congress is supposed to do. For the last six years it didn't happen. Now it is. It is about time. There is six years of oversight to complete in less than two years.

I am extremely sorry that you have yet to realize the full extent of the lies, dishonor, and compete lack of ethics of the Bush administration. As the Congressional investigations continue, the facts will come out.

I am fully aware of your service to our country and what it has cost you. I thank you for serving our country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Congress, since the election, has consistently side-stepped real work to focus on discrediting a leader whom no one is running against in 2008.



And what again did the glorious republican controlled congress achieve while enjoying almost absolute power for quite some time?


(it is unusual for this many to get terminated in the middle of the second term of a presidency. We aren't talking about 1 getting canned.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>And what again did the glorious republican controlled congress
>achieve while enjoying almost absolute power for quite some time?

Now come on, that's not fair.

They prevented 9/11 - well, they almost did.

They invaded Iraq and confiscated Saddam's WMD's
freed the Iraqis from a life of terror
stopped Al Qaeda dead in their tracks
closed the torture and rape rooms
ended the mass graves
caught Saddam.

They invaded Afghanistan and caught Bin Laden
stopped Al Qaeda
eliminated the Taliban
closed Al Qaeda's sanctuaries
got Al Qaeda moved a few hundred miles to a different sanctuary.

They restored honor and integrity to the White House
brought some honor back to the White House
avoided criminal charges
avoided criminal charges on the major players.

They took good care of wounded vets
didn't treat wounded vets too badly
found a good scapegoat for the mistreatment of vets.

They paid down the debt
balanced the budget
didn't increase spending as fast as Clinton
OK, they blew it on this one.

See? You can still meet goals if you just move the goalposts fast enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>And what again did the glorious republican controlled congress
>achieve while enjoying almost absolute power for quite some time?

Now come on, that's not fair.

They prevented 9/11 - well, they almost did.

They invaded Iraq and confiscated Saddam's WMD's
freed the Iraqis from a life of terror
stopped Al Qaeda dead in their tracks
closed the torture and rape rooms
ended the mass graves
caught Saddam.

They invaded Afghanistan and caught Bin Laden
stopped Al Qaeda
eliminated the Taliban
closed Al Qaeda's sanctuaries
got Al Qaeda moved a few hundred miles to a different sanctuary.

They restored honor and integrity to the White House
brought some honor back to the White House
avoided criminal charges
avoided criminal charges on the major players.

They took good care of wounded vets
didn't treat wounded vets too badly
found a good scapegoat for the mistreatment of vets.


They paid down the debt
balanced the budget
didn't increase spending as fast as Clinton
OK, they blew it on this one.

See? You can still meet goals if you just move the goalposts fast enough.


Although I really disagree with the bolded part, I will give you a hearty "Mission Accomplished" on the rest. Doing a heck of a job, Bill!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I still don't see the scandal of this. The federal prosecutors are Presidential appointees. They can be dismissed at anytime, for any reason.

It happened under previous administrations too.



Oh come one now. This manufactured scandal can't be dismissed that easily
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Incorrect. Prosecutors have been dismissed en masse previously at the beginning of an administration; they have not been replaced selectively to abort specific investigations or punish prosecutors for not toeing the adminstration's line.

First off, the U.S. Attorneys should be like a professional referee. They should go after any apparent crime without bias.

It is my understanding that there was some apparent voter fraud that was not being investigated. if the reason for this was because the attorneys were displaying partisanship, they were being politcal and deserved to be fired.

Of course it's politcal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>This manufactured scandal can't be dismissed that easily

It could be dismissed very easily - let the people involved testify and let the truth come out. (Of course, that will never happen. They can't lie under oath, so they will never, ever agree to go under oath.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I still don't see the scandal of this. The federal prosecutors are Presidential appointees. They can be dismissed at anytime, for any reason.

It happened under previous administrations too.



Oh come one now. This manufactured scandal can't be dismissed that easily



Pay attention:

Pelosi - "I want my jet" was manufactured.

These prosecutors really were fired. Even GOP senators are pissed.

Quite a difference.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0