SpeedRacer 1 #1 March 26, 2007 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17794538/ some militants uniting against Al Quaida. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2 March 26, 2007 Posted this am and not one reply. Hhhmmmmm Better news coming regulary of late. Got to ignore it. Losing in Iraq has to be done to empower the Dem party, which has staked it future on that very loss. So much so, they have to try and insure a loss in Iraq."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #3 March 26, 2007 QuoteBetter news coming regulary of late. Got to ignore it. Losing in Iraq has to be done to empower the Dem party, which has staked it future on that very loss. So much so, they have to try and insure a loss in Iraq. While a victory may help the repubs and not do any favors for the dems in the polls, I find it hard to believe that the dems actually want us to lose. Seems like conspiracy theory material to me.“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #4 March 26, 2007 QuoteQuoteBetter news coming regulary of late. Got to ignore it. Losing in Iraq has to be done to empower the Dem party, which has staked it future on that very loss. So much so, they have to try and insure a loss in Iraq. While a victory may help the repubs and not do any favors for the dems in the polls, I find it hard to believe that the dems actually want us to lose. Seems like conspiracy theory material to me. I see and understand your point. I guess I base my assumption (and that is all it is) on their actions. Thata all"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #5 March 26, 2007 > While a victory may help the repubs and not do any favors for the dems in the polls, I find it hard to believe that the dems actually want us to lose. Seems like conspiracy theory material to me. Dems have scheduled an Iraqi retreat to begin September of 2008 if not before. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #6 March 26, 2007 http://www.antiwar.com/orig/jeserich.php?articleid=6094 That idea appears to have been shot down, at least for now.“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #7 March 27, 2007 QuotePosted this am and not one reply. Hhhmmmmm Better news coming regulary of late. Got to ignore it. Losing in Iraq has to be done to empower the Dem party, which has staked it future on that very loss. So much so, they have to try and insure a loss in Iraq. I don't think so. It's kinda bass-ackwards don't you think??? The whole reason you choose party X over party Y is because you believe it's best for the country. I don't think most people want things to go badly for the country just to have their (opposing) party win. It would defeat the purpose. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #8 March 27, 2007 Quotehttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17794538/ some militants uniting against Al Quaida.http://www.stinkzone.com/cgi-bin/archives/000184.html"Annual deaths during Saddam rule: between 25,000 to 50,000 Annual deaths during U.S. Occupation: about 66,000"I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #9 March 27, 2007 QuoteQuotePosted this am and not one reply. Hhhmmmmm Better news coming regulary of late. Got to ignore it. Losing in Iraq has to be done to empower the Dem party, which has staked it future on that very loss. So much so, they have to try and insure a loss in Iraq. I don't think so. It's kinda bass-ackwards don't you think??? The whole reason you choose party X over party Y is because you believe it's best for the country. I don't think most people want things to go badly for the country just to have their (opposing) party win. It would defeat the purpose. I understand but you have to admit that the Dems have hung themselves in a position that they may not survive. Second, I dont see the Dems (and the same goes for politions in both parties and the media) caring about their country more than their own power cost be damed."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #10 March 27, 2007 Personally, I dont care which side of the House is uncomfortable... they are all in it for what ever they can get... it's the folk in Iraq (both residents and our lads) who are living through hell and should be supported by everyone... Fuck the political point scoring, it's just meaningless vapour. (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites