0
MDMA

Hunting for pure fun

Recommended Posts

I'm all for eating meat

I'm talking about people who go out simple to shoot animals because they think it's fun....yes, some of them might eat it afterwards, but that's irelivant really, they killed it for the fun part

killing for fun is for numptys


.....................................................
There's a whole lot more to hunting than just going out to kill something for fun. I've killed enough game over the years, that to tell you the truth I no longer enjoy pulling the trigger on a game animal. But I still hunt because there's more to it than that.

I like hiking in with a pack on my back, or even riding back into a wilderness area with horses and then camping, hunting, and fishing. It doesn't really matter anymore if I get something or not. I just like being a part of nature. Usually I take my family along. If we get some meat for the freezer, that is a plus. My wife and daughters do most of the shooting these days.

Like it or not, being a hunter is something that is bred into humans. We have been hunters for thousands of years and in my opinion, there is nothing more natural than hunting.

If the only reason I hunted was to kill something I'd get a job in a butcher shop. The thought of that sickens me.

Sure this is the 21st century. I could hire someone else to kill my meat for me. It just makes more sense to me, to do it myself, by hunting....Steve1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

the fact some fuck-witts on here say they eat what they kill, there's no need to kill it in the first place



We could all be vegetarians of course, if that's what you mean, why don't you just say so?

Quote

it's of interest that only Americans so far are posting how macho it is to kill animals and eat them..... what are those sterotypes again about yanks and guns ?



Norwegian speaking, and moosehunting season is holier than christmas around here.


Happy trollin' btw, and better luck next time :)


what i'm saying is that there is no need for Chuck Square jaw and his feckless son, also called Chuck, to go out and hunt animals.... whether they eat it afterwards is irrelevent. There is plenty of meat available in shops, this is the 21st centuary


Now consider this: Cory the Cow lives all her life in a small cage. She is fed food that doesn't look nor taste like grass, filled with meds and shit to make her fat. She's genetically manipulated to further her fatness, and it also means she wouldn't even theoretically survive in the wild. Then one day she's forced onto a truck, taken to the slaughterhouse, forced around by the use of electrical shockers, and frozen with fear, finally shot in the head.

Then you have Mike the Moose. Mike is born by his happy mother somewhere out in mother nature, under the clear blue sky. He plays around with his family during his childhood years, and then he moves out, where he finds Minny the Moose. They fall in love, and have babies and stuff and just in the middle of all the happyness, suddenly *BANG* .. the end.

Who lived the happier life ? :)
Quote

lets not mince words, the "fun" killers who say they eat what they kill are only trying to justify their own stupid actions, there's no need to hunt for food, there is no need to hunt for fun... get with the program Chet !!!!



Yes, it really sucks when people have fun. There should be a law against that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Oh, and you never answered my other question: What sport do people with big dicks play?

And what kind of dick does a guy have if he happens to participate in both a big-dick sport, as well as the hunting little-dick sport?



Heh. It's my step mother in my family who is the hunter. She has big tits and a vagina, but no dick at all. Should she be allowed to participate?



Gosh, I hadn't even thought about female hunters and MDMA's dick-size theory. This is getting really confusing now... Maybe female hunters are compensating for breasts that are too small. I hope that MDMA will come back and give us some of his expert guidance on this matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Oh, and you never answered my other question: What sport do people with big dicks play?

And what kind of dick does a guy have if he happens to participate in both a big-dick sport, as well as the hunting little-dick sport?



Heh. It's my step mother in my family who is the hunter. She has big tits and a vagina, but no dick at all. Should she be allowed to participate?


Gosh, I hadn't even thought about female hunters and MDMA's dick-size theory. This is getting really confusing now... Maybe female hunters are compensating for breasts that are too small. I hope that MDMA will come back and give us some of his expert guidance on this matter.


I don't think so John, he must have missed the memo that mankind has hunted and harvested for thousand of years to feed.:| And apparently he also missed the memo on how hunting is also a worldwide sport, it is not a unique"American" activity...geez.:D:D
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I don't think so John, he must have missed the memo that mankind
>has hunted and harvested for thousand of years to feed.

From his first post:

"Any other neccessary reason could well be valid." (other than fun)



Also from his first post:


"Any other neccessary reason could well be valid." (other than fun) ", but purely for fun"

I guess you did not see that portion of the sentence did ya?:P
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

what i'm saying is that there is no need for Chuck Square jaw and his feckless son, also called Chuck, to go out and hunt animals....

Sounds to me like you just have a problem with a man being a man.

Being a mountain man was one the cool images of the past when I was a kid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please try and pay attention Bill? Poster will not recognize any other reason that fun.

Quote

the fact some fuck-witts on here say they eat what they kill, there's no need to kill it in the first place

it's of interest that only Americans so far are posting how macho it is to kill animals and eat them..... what are those sterotypes again about yanks and guns ?



Quote

what i'm saying is that there is no need for Chuck Square jaw and his feckless son, also called Chuck, to go out and hunt animals.... whether they eat it afterwards is irrelevent. There is plenty of meat available in shops, this is the 21st centuary



Quote

lets not mince words, the "fun" killers who say they eat what they kill are only trying to justify their own stupid actions, there's no need to hunt for food, there is no need to hunt for fun... get with the program Chet !!!!



Quote


I'm talking about people who go out simple to shoot animals because they think it's fun....yes, some of them might eat it afterwards, but that's irelivant really


That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think hunting, purely for fun, is for people with small dicks :)
Any other "neccessary" reason could well be valid, but purely for fun :S

Can any "fun" hunters explain why you think killing a defenceless animal is something to be proud of??? i'm at a loss to think of anything positive to say about the subject apart from SMALL PENIS

Bet this guy had a small dick. But BIG BALLS>http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/g/giantbear.htm
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh, I hadn't even thought about female hunters and MDMA's dick-size theory. This is getting really confusing now... Maybe female hunters are compensating for breasts that are too small. I hope that MDMA will come back and give us some of his expert guidance on this matter.


It can't be breasts. She has big boobies. However, her ovaries are history. I think she was into hunting waaaay before then though.

Really, it has to be wired into people to enjoy hunting. I mean, come on. Would cave men have done it if it was repulsive? Or maybe it's the base nature of the hunt that disgusts some of those cerebral posers. Or reaction formation for the psychodynamic types (but what would that say about that whole "dick size" analogy...lol).
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The only thing that justifies hunting is the honest fight for survival. In this day and age, with the convenience of restaurants and supermarkets, very few of us are that desparate. You say that the meat doesn't go to waste. The next time you take a walk through the meat department at the Stop n Shop, think about the amount that will be thrown away at the end of the week. Those are lives that have gone to waste. The meat supply in this country far exceeds the demand for it. Before going out and taking an innocent life, go to the store and eat what's already been killed for you.



I seldom speak like this but I will make an exception. Don't tell me what the fuck to do. In addition to always having Venison, grouse and other wild game in my freezer, I don't even buy my beef from the supermarket! Yuck! We go in on a whole cow with my inlaws and the meat is superb. We have another order in right now. I don't even buy hamburger from the grocery store. If we run out I have a grinder to make more out of other cuts of Venison or Beef. I also make my own summer sausage, snack sticks, and jerky. All smoked with the exception of some unsmoked jerky for my Wife.

I will kill and eat what I want with complete disregard to your thoughts. Or mabey not. I've had a change of heart. I will harvest one more deer than normal next year just for you. Send address if you want any for you efforts.

Thanks




If anything, I would think by hunting for your food, you would have more respect for what you hunt. it's easy to overlook what actually happens in slaughterhouses when you buy your non-grass fed, non-organic meat at the stop & shop. If you lower the demand for this type of eats, you'll raise the demand for higher quality food, and better conditions for the animals on your table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ideally, yes. I agree with you 100 percent. I realize that if every one of us hunted for ourselves (and those of us who are incapable of doing so became vegetarians), we wouldn't be throwing so many lives out the window. Unfortunately, that won't be happening anytime soon. Our world is stuck in it's ways. Between restaurants and supermarkets, there's no chance that the nation will make the collective decision to make this change. The demand for meat will always be high.
I tried to get a grip on reality, but it moved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If anybody here was really that concerned with our health and well being, we wouldn't be jumping out of planes. I'm sure you've eaten things far worse than store bought meat. Besides, I believe the existence of life takes priority over my own minor health concerns. I'm willing to bet that my life won't be cut short by my consumption of Perdue lean cuts.




<<>>

So.. I think it would be far better to shoot at least 150 million humans in this country... so that we could return the animals habitat that they need to survive...Worldwide.. I think removing about 5 Billion people would do a LOT to help animal species recover.

In most states the animals that are hunted are being hunted because there are far too many for the available habitat.

Ever seen your cute little Bambi starve to death because there are WAY to many of them for the winter feeding grounds that have dissapeared.

Most state game departments set a balance of number of animals allowed to be killed in a year...in any given game unit to keep numbers viable. BUT when a bad winter comes along... there are still massive die offs. We had one here in WA a few years ago.. many many ft of snow that the deear and elk could not get down thru. That was in the Valleys... where humans have taken most of the land for themselves...GET RID OF THE HUMANS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you're starting to make sense! There are too many humans on this planet. It sounds heartless, but feeding the starving nations only increases the amount of starving mouths in the next generation. Between improved medical care and our selfishness regarding the resources on this planet, our numbers will just keep on growing. In nature, most creatures die off when their numbers begin to exceed the food supply. That keeps the population in check. We've learned how to get around it.

I once got into an argument with a hunter who claimed that deer were overpopulating the state. C'mon! When they start driving our taxis and totin' the guns, maybe then I'll start to worry a little.:P

I tried to get a grip on reality, but it moved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Any other neccessary reason could well be valid." (other than fun) ", but purely for fun"
>I guess you did not see that portion of the sentence did ya?

Uh, yeah. He doesn't like hunting for fun - but he also says that it can be valid to hunt out of necessity.

I've killed chickens so I could eat them - but I think cockfighting is pretty immoral. Likewise, hunting for food is part of our heritage, and hunting for specific goals (disease control, predator control) is often necessary, but hunting purely for sport is something I don't want to have any part of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

but hunting purely for sport is something I don't want to have any part of.



The more complex question which seems to be tripping some people up is hunting for food while enjoying yourself.

The OP seems to think that's a problem.

edit to fix a markup error


First Class Citizen Twice Over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>The OP seems to think that's a problem.

Perhaps - but he seemed pretty adamant that what he objected to was hunting purely for fun, since that was the title of his post, he said that twice in the original post, and several times in later posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Perhaps - but he seemed pretty adamant that what he objected to was hunting purely for fun, since that was the title of his post, he said that twice in the original post, and several times in later posts.



Yeah. And then he contradicts himself. I suspect he's confused about what his issue really is.


First Class Citizen Twice Over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If anything, I would think by hunting for your food, you would have more respect for what you hunt. it's easy to overlook what actually happens in slaughterhouses when you buy your non-grass fed, non-organic meat at the stop & shop. If you lower the demand for this type of eats, you'll raise the demand for higher quality food, and better conditions for the animals on your table.



Absolutely
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0