9/11 Conspiracy Theories

[Douva 0]

Does anybody know of a good website that rebuts the most common arguments made by the 9/11 conspiracy theorists? I've looked at Snopes, but I was wondering if anyone knows of any others.

I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

[GaryRay 0]

i would love to see some of the rebut's for the conspiracy theorists. i spent like 3hrs or so watching all the video's on youtube, i really want to find something out that takes the blame off of the government. all the government has is the 9/11 report but i havnt read that yet.

JewBag.
www.jewbag.wordpress.com

[sundevil777 102]

Here's one, there are probably better examples:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

[willard 0]

http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm

[Douva 0]

Thanks for the links. Those are some very informative sites.

I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

[skinnyflyer 0]

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/

"Death is more universal than life; everyone dies but not everyone lives."
A. Sachs

[diverborg 0]

I can't believe people out there still fall for this BS?? I couldn't believe my ears the other day when a relative of mine (a student at University of Nebraska) said how one of his professors told the whole class that the world trade centers were rigged with explosives and gave them the whole fire cant melt steel bs. He was sadly convinced and nothing I could say would change his mind. Thats all we need is this caliber of professors brainwashing our easily persuaded college kids. I wonder how many college kids this guy has persuaded into thinking our govt intentionally murdered 3,000 of its own people.

[Zee 0]

You can always check out the 9/11 timeline

Not a conspiracy website but it provides access to a virtual ton of information....

Action©Sports

[vortexring 0]

Yes, but have you any evidence to the contrary?

Anyway, have a look at this, David Shayler, MI5 Whistle blower;

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974

Blimey.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[dorbie 0]

Quote

Yes, but have you any evidence to the contrary?

Anyway, have a look at this, David Shayler, MI5 Whistle blower;

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974

Blimey.

He's talking shite, he goes over the same bad science and straw man arguments of the conspiracy nuts, presenting "scientific opinion" that he's not qualified to offer. Anyone who spouts the fire cannot melt steel argument and anyone who believes it proves conspiracy is an idiot ignoring ample evidence available to anyone who cares to accept it.

Tell me why as an Architecture student 20 years ago I was trained like every other architect on the planet to clad steel frame structures with intumescent fire protection and was also trained that it would only protect the steel for a very limited time before inevitable collapse if the fire was not put down, the purpose of the protection being to allow time for evacuation not prevent collapse.

Now after this I've got to listen to every gobshite misfit with an internet connection parlay whatever semblence of credibility they pretend to have into a pitch for 9-11 conspiracy including their fuckwitted version of "scientific analysis".

Tell us why being an British intel dropout with an axe to grind qualifies someone as a structural engneer making "scientific claims"?

Tell us why all steel frame buildings have fire protection on steel structures or take your gobshite somewhere else.

Tell us why after this has already been pointed out to you in other threads are you still presenting the same hackneyed conspiracy shit?

One of the key signs of pseudoscience and conspiracy nuttery is that in the face of evidence the argument is not withdrawn, amended or corrected. The facts and simle explanaton is simply ignored. There is no reasoning with this crap because reason falls on deaf ears and the same discredited arguments and straw men are presented over and over again by people not in the slightest interested in any outcome other that their conspiracy theory being confirmed/reinforced.

It is a fucking pathetic thing to witness.

[vortexring 0]

Relax! I'm not a conspiracy nutter. I find David Shayler to be of high entertainment value.
Besides, it's quite apparant you'd have to be a fruit loop to take the man seriously.

You said: 'Tell us why after this has already been pointed out to you in other threads are you still presenting the same hackneyed conspiracy shit?'

For the entertainment value. Although I'm now feeling guilty for trolling. Oh dear.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[dorbie 0]

Quote

For the entertainment value. Although I'm now feeling guilty for trolling. Oh dear.

Hook line & sinker. I can see the funny side, but remember people who watch these get to vote.

I have come to the tragic conclusion that many people who see videos like this (perhaps even most) believe them to some extent.

[sundevil777 102]

I like the term "nutter"

People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

[NCclimber 0]

Stellar rant, Dorbie.

Now that's entertainment.