akarunway 1 #1 July 12, 2007 Sting Reveals Security Gap at Nuclear Agency By Kathleen Day Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, July 12, 2007; Undercover congressional investigators posing as West Virginia businessmen obtained a license with almost no scrutiny from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that enabled them to buy enough radioactive material from U.S. suppliers to build a "dirty bomb," a new government report says. The investigators obtained the license within 28 days from officials at the NRC, the federal agency that in addition to regulating nuclear power plants oversees radioactive materials used in health care and industry, the report by the Government Accountability Office says. NRC officials approved the request with a minimal background check that included no face-to-face interview or visit to the purported company to ensure it existed and complied with safety rules, the report says. Using a post-office box at Mail Boxes Etc., a telephone and a fax machine, the undercover investigators from the GAO obtained the license "without ever leaving their desks," the report says. After counterfeiting copies of the license, the GAO undercover agents ordered portable moisture density gauges, which contain radioactive americium-241 and cesium-137 and are commonly used at construction sites to analyze the properties of soil, water and pavement. The investigators ordered 45 gauges -- enough to build a bomb with enough radioactive material to qualify as a level-3 threat on the International Atomic Energy Agency's scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the most hazardous. The GAO investigators never took possession of the radioactive material, in part because they lacked the means to handle it safely. But the report notes that, armed with an arsenal of phony licenses, they could have secured contracts to buy much more than they did -- enabling them to make an even more lethal bomb. "We altered the license so that it appeared our bogus company could purchase an unrestricted quantity" of radioactive material, the report says. A dirty bomb is designed to use conventional explosives to cause immediate injury to people nearby but also to cause a long-lasting threat by contaminating a wider area with radioactive material. The GAO undertook the sting operation at the request of Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), the top minority member of the Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations, which since 2003 has been examining security gaps at the NRC and other federal agencies that could leave the country vulnerable to biological or nuclear attack. The report is to be the subject of hearings today before the subcommittee . The GAO study is the latest of several government reports following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to warn of serious security gaps in NRC licensing procedures. A year ago, undercover GAO officials successfully bought enough radioactive material abroad to make two dirty bombs and smuggled them into the United States at two points, one on the Canadian border and one on the border with Mexico. "It was as easy to get his material as a DVD at Netflix," Coleman said of the most recent investigation. "If al-Qaeda had set up a phony corporation in the U.S., they could have gathered enough material to make a dirty bomb. The problem is that the NRC is still operating on a pre-9/11 mentality. It boggles my mind that the NRC doesn't readily understand the threat we face." NRC commissioner Edward McGaffigan Jr. said in an interview yesterday that the agency, while concerned about any security weakness, has had to allocate finite resources to what it thinks are the biggest potential threats to public safety. He said terrorists have looked for relatively simple ways to cause massive death and damage. Devices such as the moisture gauges, he said, pose a relatively low-level risk because they require a vast amount of work to fashion into a dangerous weapon. "My sole concern, our sole concern, has been the safety of the American people," he said. After the GAO presented the NRC with the results of its undercover operation, NRC officials on June 1 ordered an immediate, temporary halt in new licenses to handle radiation risks of 3 or lower. The agency lifted the ban two weeks later after modifying its procedures to require either a face-to-face meeting or site visit, McGaffigan said. The NRC already requires site visits before issuing licenses to handle material with risk levels of 1 and 2. McGaffigan, who is to testify on behalf of the NRC at the hearing, acknowledged that one serious hurdle remains. "We have to fix the problem of people taking our licenses and counterfeiting them," he said. In a report in 2006 and again this year, the NRC's inspector general criticized NRC officials for failing to detect and understand security flaws in its licensing process. Coleman and other critics say the NRC essentially has ignored warnings for years and has done too little to remedy problems that would make it easier for someone to make a dirty bomb. Coleman called the NRC's efforts since June 1 "baby steps" that are insufficient and particularly outrageous because the agency has taken so long to act despite having been warned of serious flaws for more than four years. When GAO investigators briefed Coleman on the results of the most recent operation, they said they focused the sting on West Virginia in part to show how close to the nation's capital a terrorist could build a bomb. Such proximity would reduce the chance of detection during transport to a target, the GAO briefers said, according to Senate staff members who heard the briefing. In addition, by operating from West Virginia, the GAO undercover investigators were required to deal directly with the NRC. That's because West Virginia is one of more than a dozen states, including Virginia and the District of Columbia, that don't have their own system for issuing licenses for the handling of radioactive material and monitoring those who apply for them. During the sting operation, an NRC official speaking to one of the phony businessmen on the phone said the agency needed to speak to the man's boss. The GAO agent put him on hold for a minute or two, then picked up the call without disguising his voice but pretending to be his boss, according to people familiar with the GAO investigation. The NRC reviewer accepted the calls at face value. By contrast, the GAO investigators failed to obtain a license in Maryland, which is one of 34 states that under agreement with the NRC conduct their own licensing. Maryland officials told the disguised GAO employees that state inspectors would have to visit their company and perform other checks, which would take at least seven months. At that point, the phony businessmen withdrew their application, the report says. ________________________________________________________I'm speechless.I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #2 July 12, 2007 for added fun, the illumination system in my watch uses tritium. I'm surprised those fuckstains haven't restricted that yet.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #3 July 12, 2007 QuoteHomeland Security is doing a fine job. Actually, from what I understand, the NRC not only isn't part of the DHS, it's a standalone from the DoE. That surprised me. QuoteIn addition, by operating from West Virginia, the GAO undercover investigators were required to deal directly with the NRC. That's because West Virginia is one of more than a dozen states, including Virginia and the District of Columbia, that don't have their own system for issuing licenses for the handling of radioactive material and monitoring those who apply for them. By contrast, the GAO investigators failed to obtain a license in Maryland, which is one of 34 states that under agreement with the NRC conduct their own licensing. Maryland officials told the disguised GAO employees that state inspectors would have to visit their company and perform other checks, which would take at least seven months. The report doesn't mention it, but did this operation also file applications with the other 33 states that have their own licensing process? How did that work. Also, how did that work for the states that don't have a process?So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #4 July 13, 2007 Quotefor added fun, the illumination system in my watch uses tritium. I'm surprised those fuckstains haven't restricted that yet.So I guess then you wouldn't mind a few lbs. of this >http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/cesium.htm mixed w/ a few lbs. of this>http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/americium.htm and maybe a dash of a couple more explode in YOUR neighborhood eh?I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #5 July 13, 2007 QuoteQuotefor added fun, the illumination system in my watch uses tritium. I'm surprised those fuckstains haven't restricted that yet.So I guess then you wouldn't mind a few lbs. of this >http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/cesium.htm mixed w/ a few lbs. of this>http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/americium.htm and maybe a dash of a couple more explode in YOUR neighborhood eh? Oh, I'm happy they're closing up these holes, but in general HomeSec and their cronies the TSA are all in favour of sacrificing liberty in the name of security, which is something I can't stand.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,501 #6 July 13, 2007 Quote for added fun, the illumination system in my watch uses tritium. I'm surprised those fuckstains haven't restricted that yet. You should read Closing Time by Joseph HellerDo you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nerdgirl 0 #7 July 13, 2007 QuoteQuoteHomeland Security is doing a fine job. Actually, from what I understand, the NRC not only isn't part of the DHS, it's a standalone from the DoE. That surprised me. He's right: the NRC's primary responsibiity is w/r/t civilian use of nuclear material and licensing. Their primary authority is derived from the Atomic Energy Act (of long ago). Some of the state-level authority is part of federalism, and some of it is a result of deregulation and past efforts to reduce the size of the federal govertment. NRC's scope does impact homeland security, as does the EPA and USDA (e.g., terrorism directed at water supplies or agriculture). W/r/t DHS, the House Committee on Homeland Security did release a report yesterday expressing concern over the 24% vacancy rate (or 138 of 575) among “executive resource” positions. Of the eight DHS “at risk” departments: the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy has 11 of 23 executive positions open (48%); the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Intelligence has 8 of 22 senior positions unfilled (36%); and the Federal Emergency Management Agency has 24 of 77 executive positions open (31%). Source: http://homeland.house.gov/SiteDocuments/20070709112923-81091.pdf VR/Marg Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters. Tibetan Buddhist saying Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites