quade 4 #1 September 15, 2007 So, the Assault Weapons Ban expired a few years ago and now what are the effects? Well, this article seems to suggest that was a bad move. The extra availability of the guns in general means more and more they've found their way into the hands of pretty bad people and are being used more in gang crimes; the exact reason the AWB was put in place to begin with. So lets review; AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes down, NO AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes up. Tell me again how gun control doesn't work?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #2 September 15, 2007 Uh..yeah...ok. If you didn't notice... Quote Federal officials don't compile statistics on the number of crimes involving assault weapons like the AK-47, and municipalities' numbers across the country are patchwork. Miami is hardly a representative community within the U.S. I seriously hope your post was intended with a good dose of sarcasm. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bdog 0 #3 September 15, 2007 You keep shaking the tree to see what falls out. Do you really think anyones mind is going to be changed by rehashing the same, blah blah, redundant, beat to death issue? And that's all I have to say about that._________________________________________ ---Future Darwin Award recipient- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #4 September 15, 2007 Quote Uh..yeah...ok. If you didn't notice... Quote Federal officials don't compile statistics on the number of crimes involving assault weapons like the AK-47, and municipalities' numbers across the country are patchwork. Miami is hardly a representative community within the U.S. I seriously hope your post was intended with a good dose of sarcasm. Sarcasm?? One should have a closer look at the others, such as the Capital of Crime, Washington/DC. Or NYC. Or Chicago. Or Philadelphia. Or perhaps Gary/Indiana ...? More than just patchwork. No worries, we have our own statistics to gnaw on, even our citizens do not have about 200 million weapons in private hands - heaven help! I duly hope we over here in our little lousy little country will never reach that point, where more than 40 percent of househoulds are armed -as in the US. Ease AWB restrictions and more citizens will be killed. My personal opinion. Sorry, only in German language: http://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/blacksburg/usa_aid_53794.html dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 845 #5 September 16, 2007 yea...the extra two bullets I'm allowed in my weapon make ALL the difference. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #6 September 16, 2007 Quote So, the Assault Weapons Ban expired a few years ago and now what are the effects? Well, this article seems to suggest that was a bad move. The extra availability of the guns in general means more and more they've found their way into the hands of pretty bad people and are being used more in gang crimes; the exact reason the AWB was put in place to begin with. So lets review; AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes down, NO AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes up. Tell me again how gun control doesn't work? The price of an HK 91 went from 800 to a couple thousand.I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 September 16, 2007 QuoteSo, the Assault Weapons Ban expired a few years ago and now what are the effects? Well, this article seems to suggest that was a bad move. The extra availability of the guns in general means more and more they've found their way into the hands of pretty bad people and are being used more in gang crimes; the exact reason the AWB was put in place to begin with. So lets review; AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes down, NO AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes up. Tell me again how gun control doesn't work? Absolutly nothing changed when is was implimented either so, what is your biased anti second amendment point?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #8 September 16, 2007 I'd like to see those stats, please, if it isn't too much trouble. Just so you know, the scum who commit these crimes care not whether their weapons are legal. That's why they are criminals. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #9 September 16, 2007 QuoteOne should have a closer look at the others, such as the Capital of Crime, Washington/DC. You do realize all guns are illegal in Wash. D.C. don't you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ds8221 0 #10 September 16, 2007 The "assault weapon" ban accomplished NOTHING! It only banned the MANUFACTURE and IMPORT of semiautomatic rifles with certain cosmetic features and hicap magazines after Oct 1993. All "assault weapons" and high capacity magazines MADE BEFORE the ban were STILL LEGAL to POSSESS or legally BUY. The "assault weapon" ban did not ban the POSSESSION of ANYTHING as the "banned" items could not be legally manufactured or imported. The law applied to gun manufactures and importers! NO ONE who legally wanted an "assault weapon" or high capacity magazine was denied the opportunity to buy one BEFORE or AFTER the ban. You would have had to buy an assault weapon or magazine MANUFACTURED before the 94 ban. Any gun store had them and would have let you legally buy one! This of course is only for the federal ban, as some states/cities have banned the sale of assault weapons. Anyway, most gun crimes involve handguns as they are easily concealed. Assault weapons are used less than 5% of the time. Mostly by felons, drug dealers and gangs, and not by law abiding gun owners. If you think the ban accomplished something then you have not READ or UNDERSTOOD the 94 ban! (Guade) Americans own more "assault weapons" (and other guns) than at any time before. Just because the media covers a story in Miami on the rise of assault weapon use by CRIMINALS does not necessarily mean the trend is nationwide or even related to the expiration of the 94 ban. The drive by "media" hates guns and will always portray guns in a bad light. They RARELY cover the lawful use of guns in self defense or in any other positive light. There are cities where assault weapon use in crimes has DECLINED but the media will NEVER cover that! Criminals who would shoot at and kill police are not deterred by any (gun) laws and will aquire them regardless on the street. David Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #11 September 16, 2007 Some people will never read that. Or they choose to ignore the facts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #12 September 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteOne should have a closer look at the others, such as the Capital of Crime, Washington/DC. You do realize all guns are illegal in Wash. D.C. don't you? Yes, I do. dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #13 September 16, 2007 QuoteQuoteOne should have a closer look at the others, such as the Capital of Crime, Washington/DC. You do realize all guns are illegal in Wash. D.C. don't you? Just shows me that, someone wants a gun... they're going to get a gun. Ban or no ban. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nathaniel 0 #14 September 16, 2007 What strikes me about the article is this part: Quote Rivera pleaded for leaders to allow police to carry higher-power weapons - though not necessarily as strong as some already on the street .... There doesn't seem to be any justification for stronger weapons for the police anywhere in the article...esp after they say that assault rifles increase the risk of hitting bystanders...and the police did just fine killing this guy with the guns they already had. Seems like they can't decide whether they're for or against assault rifles.My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ds8221 0 #15 September 17, 2007 I think the problem with "assault weapons" in Miami will be solved. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070917/ap_on_re_us/officers_injured_2[url] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #16 September 17, 2007 QuoteQuoteOne should have a closer look at the others, such as the Capital of Crime, Washington/DC. You do realize all guns are illegal in Wash. D.C. don't you? You can't have a hunting rifle in tha attic? I find that hard to believe, but if you say so....... Link to that law? -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #17 September 17, 2007 It's been against the law to own any gun in DC since 1976. The House recently voted to repeal the ban and it's just waiting Senate approval. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60034-2004Sep29.html Some of the pro-gunners on here can give you more info. I don't own a gun, so I don't really stay up with the most recent progress. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AWL71 0 #18 September 17, 2007 QuoteThe "assault weapon" ban accomplished NOTHING! It only banned the MANUFACTURE and IMPORT of semiautomatic rifles with certain cosmetic features and hicap magazines after Oct 1993. All "assault weapons" and high capacity magazines MADE BEFORE the ban were STILL LEGAL to POSSESS or legally BUY. The "assault weapon" ban did not ban the POSSESSION of ANYTHING as the "banned" items could not be legally manufactured or imported. The law applied to gun manufactures and importers! NO ONE who legally wanted an "assault weapon" or high capacity magazine was denied the opportunity to buy one BEFORE or AFTER the ban. You would have had to buy an assault weapon or magazine MANUFACTURED before the 94 ban. Any gun store had them and would have let you legally buy one! This of course is only for the federal ban, as some states/cities have banned the sale of assault weapons. Anyway, most gun crimes involve handguns as they are easily concealed. Assault weapons are used less than 5% of the time. Mostly by felons, drug dealers and gangs, and not by law abiding gun owners. If you think the ban accomplished something then you have not READ or UNDERSTOOD the 94 ban! (Guade) Americans own more "assault weapons" (and other guns) than at any time before. Just because the media covers a story in Miami on the rise of assault weapon use by CRIMINALS does not necessarily mean the trend is nationwide or even related to the expiration of the 94 ban. The drive by "media" hates guns and will always portray guns in a bad light. They RARELY cover the lawful use of guns in self defense or in any other positive light. There are cities where assault weapon use in crimes has DECLINED but the media will NEVER cover that! Criminals who would shoot at and kill police are not deterred by any (gun) laws and will aquire them regardless on the street. David Excellent Post. Gangbangers don't go to Joe's gun shop to get their guns. They steal them, etc. And they prefer handguns. AWB was fluff that had nothing to do with preventing crime but more with banning guns. It also made some nice weapons real hard to get...like a HK 91.The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #19 September 17, 2007 QuoteIt's been against the law to own any gun in DC since 1976. The House recently voted to repeal the ban and it's just waiting Senate approval. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60034-2004Sep29.html Some of the pro-gunners on here can give you more info. I don't own a gun, so I don't really stay up with the most recent progress. The article says UNREGISTERED weapons. So it sounds like to can have a registered rifle in your attic. EDIT: OK, I found it. You can have ALL KINDS of guns in DC. You just can't carry, or have unregistered. http://www.nraila.org/statelawpdfs/DCCL.pdf -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #20 September 17, 2007 I think you didn't read it closely enough. Handguns No handgun can be legally possessed in the District unless it is registered. All handguns registered in the District prior to Sept. 24, 1976, were required to have been reregistered by Feb. 5, 1977. After that date, no more handguns could be registered. Thus, it is unlawful to possess, acquire, or bring into D.C. any handgun which was not registered as of Feb. 5, 1977. Rifles and Shotguns A person may buy or sell a firearm only from or to a licensed dealer in the District. Delivery cannot be made until the registration certificate for the firearm is approved by the Metropolitan Police Dept. Ammunition may be bought only for the caliber or gauge of a firearm registered to the buyer. -- Somehow I suspect there aren't many (any?) licensed dealers, and that the approval doesn't come in any hurry. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #21 September 17, 2007 QuoteSomehow I suspect there aren't many (any?) licensed dealers, and that the approval doesn't come in any hurry. I've lived in the DC area most of my life and I can't recall ever seeing a retail gun shop. There are plenty of liquor stores, though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bch7773 0 #22 September 18, 2007 Quote So lets review; AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes down, NO AWB and crimes using assault weapons goes up. Tell me again how gun control doesn't work? well considering we are basing your beliefs off ONE news article in ONE city in america, I'd say it isn't worth the argument. MB 3528, RB 1182 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites