nerdgirl 0
QuoteDo the gun lovers think that school massacres are just an unfortunate price that has to be paid so that they can keep their guns?
It's one of the consequences that may be eliminated by armed teachers, principals, or others who would provide the shooter with a thought against it.
Do police stations get shot up? How about gun shows? Target ranges? Nope.
Let's say you want to kill a lot of people with a minimum of problems. You look for a place where people are unprotected because firearms aren't allowed anywhere near them and a nice concentration of easy pickings.
Oh, schools! Yes. Guns aren't allowed on schools. They won't have any protection. Let's shoot them up!
The only protection being offered to these kids is taking their protections away. What a shame.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Zipp0 1
Quote
The first person shot, 14-year-old Michael Peek, had punched Coon in the face right before the shootings began...Source: http://news.yahoo.com/...s/school_shooting_70
Doesn't this back up my earlier post? This could have been settled with fists instead of guns. The kid needed a way to respond to getting punched in the face, which is understandable. He just took the wrong path.
I have very little remorse for school bullies who get shot nowadays. It seems they should have figured out that this is a possible consequence considering all of these incidents, and often the target of their bullying gives them a warning like "I am going to shoot you in the head." Is it an appropriate respnse to bullying? Of course not. But you might want to think twice before you punch the mentally distressed goth kid.
--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.
ExAFO 0
QuoteDo the gun lovers think that school massacres are just an unfortunate price that has to be paid so that they can keep their guns?
And also.... Do Americans still think they need an armed populous/millitia to deter any potential attackers from trying to invade their country? do they think their armed forces won't be able to cope on their own if they are attacked and so will need the help of the gun toting members of the public to help them?
So sayeth the anonymous poster who's trolling for reactions.
AWL71 0
QuoteQuoteDo the gun lovers think that school massacres are just an unfortunate price that has to be paid so that they can keep their guns?
It's one of the consequences that may be eliminated by armed teachers, principals, or others who would provide the shooter with a thought against it.
Do police stations get shot up? How about gun shows? Target ranges? Nope.
Let's say you want to kill a lot of people with a minimum of problems. You look for a place where people are unprotected because firearms aren't allowed anywhere near them and a nice concentration of easy pickings.
Oh, schools! Yes. Guns aren't allowed on schools. They won't have any protection. Let's shoot them up!
The only protection being offered to these kids is taking their protections away. What a shame.
I couldn't agree more. I have three kids in school and I would be happy as a pig in mud if I know their teachers were armed and knew how to use a gun. Schools are sitting ducks for shootings, etc.
Zipp0 1
No. This has nothing to do with guns, it has to do with culture. Kids once brought guns to school all the time, and nobody got shot. I had my first gun a 12 years old. I have yet to shoot anyone.
I do think we have a problem with bullying that is causing some of these incidents. Kids who think that there is no alternative choose the gun as a way to equalize the situation. Maybe if we got these kids some self-defense lessons, taught them to lift weights, and let them fight with their fists a bit more, with less severe consequences, the shootings would diminish.
I was bullied when younger, and ended up in lots of fights. I lost some and won some, but never let anyone think that I wouldn't punch them in the face if they pushed hard enough. The thought of using a gun never entered my mind. My gun was for deer and squirrels.
An armed populace is less prone to domination by a tyranical government. In addition, we all have a god given right to self-defense.
--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
Royd 0
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
Zipp0 1
Which incident? The actual shootings, or the kid that was caught with 30 BB guns and soda bottles full of gun powder?
And honestly I haven't read enough on either to make a guess. I suppose I am just sayying that suppressing all expressions of anger or frustration may lead to these catastrophies, instead of a bunch of smaller incidents.
--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanatos340 1
I hate it when I find that I agree with you completely on something.
Makes me really question my logic. But as much as it pains me to admit.. I agree.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
The_Almighty 0
oh.... nice personal attack
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
Zipp0 1
I respect you for admitting that, since I know how painful that was to type!
But hey, it's my gun views that let me stay registered as a Republican without being a TOTAL hypocrite.
--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
Royd 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe if we got these kids some self-defense lessons, taught them to lift weights, and let them fight with their fists a bit more, with less severe consequences, the shootings would diminish.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you really think that the kid in this last incident would have put forth such an effort. I doubt it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The recent shooting. The kid looked about 5'7" and probably weighed a minimum of 250lb.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
The_Almighty 0
typical american then
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
JohnRich 4
News excerpts: Source: http://news.yahoo.com/...s/school_shooting_70
With all that stuff going wrong in this kids life, the only thing you can think to blame is the law-abiding gun owners who had nothing to do with the crime?
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites
Richards 0
The US military will not always be the supreme superpower in this world. Someday someone else will be more powerfull and unless we acheive some sort of majical world harmony the risk of occupation would not just be the stuff of cheezy B movies.
I'm no expert but evidence indicates that in fact an armed insurgency can grind down an occupying force. Ceteris paribus I would much rather invade a country like Canada where guns are at a minimum than invade the US where across the vastness of your country lays a heavily armed population.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites