Zipp0 1 #1 October 17, 2007 Now he's talking about World War III. Jesus Fucking Christ..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071017/ts_nm/iran_bush_dc I know Iran should not be allowed to have a nuke, but this shithead is pissing me off, and probably the rest of the world, too. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #3 October 17, 2007 QuoteTissue? Nah, but I'll take a bomb shelter if ya got one. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AWL71 0 #4 October 17, 2007 QuoteNow he's talking about World War III. Jesus Fucking Christ..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071017/ts_nm/iran_bush_dc I know Iran should not be allowed to have a nuke, but this shithead is pissing me off, and probably the rest of the world, too. He was talking about AVOIDING WWIII and shoring up international support against Iran's nuclear effort. We should all be able to agree on the fact that we don't want Iran having a nuke.The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #5 October 17, 2007 QuoteNow he's talking about World War III. Jesus Fucking Christ..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071017/ts_nm/iran_bush_dc I know Iran should not be allowed to have a nuke, but this shithead is pissing me off, and probably the rest of the world, too. http://youtube.com/watch?v=L5ulGiPp0LQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3gQfz8GC0o&mode=related&search=Hillary%20Clinton%20President%20George%20Bush%20Iraq%20Iran%20Ahmadinejad%20War Looks like Bush has support for this one. . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #6 October 17, 2007 QuoteQuoteNow he's talking about World War III. Jesus Fucking Christ..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071017/ts_nm/iran_bush_dc I know Iran should not be allowed to have a nuke, but this shithead is pissing me off, and probably the rest of the world, too. http://youtube.com/watch?v=L5ulGiPp0LQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3gQfz8GC0o&mode=related&search=Hillary%20Clinton%20President%20George%20Bush%20Iraq%20Iran%20Ahmadinejad%20War Looks like Bush has support for this one. . Can't get youtube at work. What is that? Anyway, it looks like it will be China, Iran, Russia, against the USA, with quite a few sitting this one out, if it does happen. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #7 October 17, 2007 It's Hillary agreeing with Bush on Iran. Better get used to WW3 if she becomes President. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #8 October 18, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Now he's talking about World War III. Jesus Fucking Christ..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071017/ts_nm/iran_bush_dc I know Iran should not be allowed to have a nuke, but this shithead is pissing me off, and probably the rest of the world, too. http://youtube.com/watch?v=L5ulGiPp0LQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3gQfz8GC0o&mode=related&search=Hillary%20Clinton%20President%20George%20Bush%20Iraq%20Iran%20Ahmadinejad%20War Looks like Bush has support for this one. . Can't get youtube at work. What is that? Anyway, it looks like it will be China, Iran, Russia, against the USA, with quite a few sitting this one out, if it does happen. Throw Pakistan, India, N. Korea and Israel into the mix and we'll have quite a party.I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #9 October 18, 2007 Quote Quote Anyway, it looks like it will be China, Iran, Russia, against the USA, with quite a few sitting this one out, if it does happen. Throw Pakistan, India, N. Korea and Israel into the mix and we'll have quite a party. Note to self: Sell domestic currency holdings. Buy defense contractor stock tomorrow. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #10 October 18, 2007 Quote Now he's talking about World War III. Jesus Fucking Christ..... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071017/ts_nm/iran_bush_dc I know Iran should not be allowed to have a nuke, but this shithead is pissing me off, and probably the rest of the world, too. You're pissed off because he is stating what everyone agrees upon-that Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons? Why does that piss you off? Oh yeah, dumb question. You get pissed at anything Bush says. Want some cheese? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n23x 0 #11 October 18, 2007 QuoteIran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons? Should the US? Why? .jim"Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #12 October 18, 2007 Quote Quote Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons? Should the US? Why? .jim Q: Should the U.S. have nukes? A: Hell yeah! Q: Why? A: Because I said so. Isn't it past your bedtime? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n23x 0 #13 October 18, 2007 Quote Q: Should the U.S. have nukes? A: Hell yeah! Q: Why? A: Because I said so. Terrible. Quote Isn't it past your bedtime? And no, us young guys stay up way past when you old guys usually pop some metemucil and fall asleep on the toilet. .jim"Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funkcanna 0 #14 October 18, 2007 Quote Should the US? Why? .jim Nope. Who decided to make the US the world police? They are just as likely to start WW3 as anyone else.To know requires proof To believe requires evidence To have faith requires neither. If you stick with that, we'll never be confused again Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #15 October 18, 2007 QuoteQuote Should the US? Why? .jim Nope. Who decided to make the US the world police? They are just as likely to start WW3 as anyone else. Are we just as likely to use a nuclear bomb as N. Korea or Iran? If yes, why? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,537 #16 October 18, 2007 How do we know how likely they are? Actually, the penalty for one of them using it would be considerably greater than for our using it, as a nation. It's wrong to assume that others are stupid just because they're not like us, or don't share all our values. I rather doubt that any nation will use nukes. They'll rattle them like sabers, and we'll hope that they keep them safe. Individuals or small groups (i.e. terrorists) are far more likely to use nukes. That said, I think we're making far too much of Iran right now, and trying far too hard to maintain our "position as world moral leaders." We pissed that one away by invading another country (Iraq). Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonto 1 #17 October 18, 2007 Quote Are we just as likely to use a nuclear bomb as N. Korea or Iran? If yes, why? Well, 1st, you've got them. 2nd you've used them before. No one else has. tIt's the year of the Pig. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nerdgirl 0 #18 October 18, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons? Should the US? Why? .jim Q: Should the U.S. have nukes? A: Hell yeah! Q: Why? A: Because I said so. There's more too it than that ... unless you're being very stealth under-the-radar Mr. President -- --- -- Jim, It's a legitimate question that's worth talking about given the current proto-proliferation wave going on internationally, i.e., Iran, DPRK ... A short answer is because the NPT (& the ratifying US legislation, signed by President Nixon) says we can, along w/the other signatory nuclear weapons states pre-1969. Much-debated Article VI says also NWS will make efforts toward total disarmament ... it doesn't say when. One of my favorite nuc-related sites, which doesn't doesn't get a lot of visibiity, is http://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/ The front page summarizes another part of the argument: "Why Nuclear Matters .... "Nuclear weapons will continue to be a national security concern for the U.S. as long as nuclear weapon technologies exist in the hands of other nations or non-state entities." The US nuclear "umbrella" has provided an incentive for allies with latent technical capability to forgo developing independent arsenals. Would you believe that at one point Sweden and Norway seriously considered nuclear weapons programs? They were concerned about Soviets coming up over the Barent's sea (where Norway has a land border w/Russia). I wish the world were such that we could eliminate all nuclear weapons *and* be confident in complete global disarmament. VR/Marg Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters. Tibetan Buddhist saying Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCclimber 0 #19 October 18, 2007 QuoteQuote Are we just as likely to use a nuclear bomb as N. Korea or Iran? If yes, why? Well, 1st, you've got them. 2nd you've used them before. No one else has. t Did you come up with that all by yourself? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonto 1 #20 October 18, 2007 Quote Did you come up with that all by yourself? Nukes are a bit like guns, really. If you're a 98 pound weakling (Iran) and you see some big, muscular bully come in and spank the other 98 pound weakling (Iraq) that you fought tooth and nail from 1980 to 1988 and ended in stalemate - in three weeks - you may figure you need an equaliser of some sort. tIt's the year of the Pig. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #21 October 18, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuote Are we just as likely to use a nuclear bomb as N. Korea or Iran? If yes, why? Well, 1st, you've got them. 2nd you've used them before. No one else has. t Did you come up with that all by yourself? Why not address his point instead of being insulting?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #22 October 18, 2007 QuoteQuote Are we just as likely to use a nuclear bomb as N. Korea or Iran? If yes, why? Well, 1st, you've got them. 2nd you've used them before. No one else has. t And I'm glad we did. It saved American lives. I'm glad Col Tibbets turned Hiroshima into a scene resembling Gary, Indiana. It kept my grandfathers from being sent in an invasion of the Japanese home island. I read once somewhere that the supply of Purple Hearts made in anticipation of the invasion of Japan has yet to be exhausted since that invasion didn't happen. And there is a slight difference between Fat Man and Little Boy and modern Nukes. It's a case of a BB gun versus a Howitzer.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CornishChris 5 #23 October 18, 2007 What?! Really?! GWB exagerate the threat another country poses the US and it's allies. I can't believe he would ever do anything like that and he definitely won't then use it as justification for military action, that would just be irresponsible, illegal and immoral, especially from a world superpower.... CJP Gods don't kill people. People with Gods kill people Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #24 October 18, 2007 Quote Are we just as likely to use a nuclear bomb as N. Korea or Iran? If yes, why? Quite possibly. I'm assuming that tactical nukes are still considered nuclear bombs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livendive 8 #25 October 18, 2007 QuoteHe was talking about AVOIDING WWIII and shoring up international support against Iran's nuclear effort. We should all be able to agree on the fact that we don't want Iran having a nuke. In context, he was making a roundabout threat regarding WWIII, and no, I do not agree with that. In June, an overwhelming majority of Republican Presidential candidates said they would consider the use of nuclear weapons against Iran. As a non-politician, I'm not big on being two-faced, therefore I think Iran should be able to legally pursue possession of any weapon the US or other sabre rattling countries keep in their arsenal. Iran is not the only country with a short-sighted egomaniac at its helm, and she deserves the right to defend herself. Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
