0
WooHoo

7 cell v 9 cell

Recommended Posts

I currently jump a Spectre and really enjoy it. However I am currently buying a new rig, and a number of people have said I will have more fun flying a nine cell.


I am pretty conservative and have no plans to hook turn or swoop, so even though I know there are pros and cons on both sides. Simply from a practical perspective does the 7 cell have any major advantage over the nine cell other than a greater range of flight characteristics ( I couldn't spell maneuverability ( see I told you so!).

I learnt on a Sabre and have jumped a Sabre2, but all the demo conopies have been too small for me to trial, so if I buy ( either a Safire2 or Sabre2) it will be without much experience on them.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well:

a) do a search. This has been discussed a lot.

b) 9 cells tend to glide a bit farther and have a bit more flare, but this varies greatly from canopy to canopy. (For example, a Xaos-21 is technically a 7-cell, but will definitely out-flare a 9 cell Sabre.)

c) 7 cells seem to be a bit more resistant to turbulence.

If you are trying for a docile, easy to land 9 cell, I'd recommend checking out the pilot, safire 2 and sabre 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you really, really can't demo canopies, and you know you like the Spectre, why not get one? People around you may like 9-cells, but *lots* of people all over the world like Spectres a *lot*, too. They can't all be wrong, right? (Sure they can. But they're not.)

But if you really, really want to, I think you can demo some canopies. It may take time, it may take patience, maybe even a little money, but hey - take all winter. If all of London can't supply you with a demo, come to Holland - Teuge has everything you want. Or just get a cheap ticket to Empuria for Christmas and demo your ass off.

You don't have to make tons of jumps on each canopy - my first and second canopy I basically decided after *one* jump on the respective model (and the first one was a Silhouette - skydiving's best kept secret - and BillVon knows that, firsthand. Bill, how could you forget? :)
Johan.
I am. I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's my uninformed opinion that much of the 7 cell vs. 9 cell conventional wisdom comes from the days of F111 mains and doesn't necessarily apply to today's canopies. Next time someone says 7 cell canopies suck, ask them to count the cells on a Velocity...

I did 400+ jumps on my Spectre 190 loaded at ~1.0. It was a great canopy, and I'd highly recommend it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's my uninformed opinion that much of the 7 cell vs. 9 cell conventional wisdom comes from the days of F111 mains and doesn't necessarily apply to today's canopies. Next time someone says 7 cell canopies suck, ask them to count the cells on a Velocity...

I did 400+ jumps on my Spectre 190 loaded at ~1.0. It was a great canopy, and I'd highly recommend it.



I did a couple jumps on a Spectre 150 and LOVED it, after 200 jumps on a Sabre 2 150. It's got probably 90% of the performance of a Sabre 2 with much nicer openings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's my uninformed opinion that much of the 7 cell vs. 9 cell conventional wisdom comes from the days of F111 mains and doesn't necessarily apply to today's canopies. Next time someone says 7 cell canopies suck, ask them to count the cells on a Velocity...

I did 400+ jumps on my Spectre 190 loaded at ~1.0. It was a great canopy, and I'd highly recommend it.



Second to that,
If you (OP) sure you don't want to swooping that IMO - Spectre the best choice. Very, very nice and fun to fly canopy! deamn you even can swoop it (hovewer don't recommend coz can form a bad habbit to turn low)
Why drink and drive, if you can smoke and fly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

(hovewer don't recommend coz can form a bad habbit to turn low)



Hmmm...It also has a shorter recovery arc that helps you recover when you screw up. A canopy is a canopy and you fly that canopy as efficently as you can. It was amazing to see all of those Stiletto pilots die when the Velo came out, with such a change in recovery arc.

I've seen the Spectre, the Stiletto and the Sabre2 swooped really well. They all have relatively similar recovery arcs (compared to the XF2, Katana, Velo, VX, etc). I've also seen those canopies used by people to learn the basics on before they moved on. I used those canopies to learn before I moved on to more swoop specific canopies. A short recovery arc isn't really a bad thing, it just is what it is and you have to understand that. Especially when transitioning to a canopy, such as a katana, that has a significantly longer recovery arc.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If you (OP) sure you don't want to swooping that IMO - Spectre the best choice. Very, very nice and fun to fly canopy! deamn you even can swoop it (hovewer don't recommend coz can form a bad habbit to turn low)


Yeah, I can say the same about Pilot, Cobalt.....B|

It is no ultimate answer for this other than try and fly them. You have decide by yourself. I've been flying 7cell so nevertheless I prefer 9cell from the beginning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll add Triathlon to the list of recommended 7-cell canopies. Very good all-around canopy. The Spectre seems to be PDs answer to the Triathlon and they are very, very similar in flight characteristics. I've flown both and I'd buy either one with price being the deciding factor.

Although, I must say, I would lean more to toward Aerodyne in this chooice between the two because I've heard too many PD reps bad-mouthing all other manufacturers products and I have heard very few other reps bad-mouthing anybody.

Funny how DZs take on a "mind set" with respect to gear.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The Spectre seems to be PDs answer to the Triathlon and they are very, very similar in flight characteristics.



More complicated then that....

The Spectre may have been PD's response to the original Tri. Since then, Aerodyne has redesigned it to be what could be called its answer to the Spectre...
Remster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Funny how DZs take on a "mind set" with respect to gear.



People follow what is obviously working for others. Bonus is the potential for discount rates and being able to easily try out that type.

What's weird to me is how different neighboring DZs can be in this regard - suggesting dealer relationships/promotions can have a strong effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're speaking of the Triathlon Mod-A of course...somewhat different than the original, yes.

IMHO, an upgrade that really didn't need to happen.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You're speaking of the Triathlon Mod-A of course...somewhat different than the original, yes.

IMHO, an upgrade that really didn't need to happen.



When did this MOD happen? If you don't mind me asking.

<><><><><><><><><><><>

The greatest risk you take in life is the risk you don't take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

9 cells tend to glide a bit farther




From PD website:

Newer seven-cells benefit from improved materials and aerodynamics, and retain the advantages of traditional seven-cells while eliminating some of the disadvantages. Some modern seven-cells glide farther than comparable nine-cells. Most nine-cells will still level off or “swoop” farther when flared, but landings on some seven-cells can easily be just as soft. Seven-cells still tend to pack smaller than nine-cells, and are more agile in deep brakes.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a 9 cell will have a higher aspect ratio and lower spanwise distortion than a 7 cell.

therefore a nicely designed 9 cell will always have a higher glide ratio than a nicely designed 7 cell.
Daniel Preston <><>
atairaerodynamics.com (sport)
atairaerospace.com (military)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I love my '7' cell! :D

I've jumped a few tri's over my short career and never really liked em. I started jumping old Sabres early on and anytime I jumped a tri, I just didnt like the performance. Although the openings were always nice compared to a sabre. but pretty much everything had a better opening than a large Sabre I. :D
Goddam dirty hippies piss me off! ~GFD
"What do I get for closing your rig?" ~ me
"Anything you want." ~ female skydiver
Mohoso Rodriguez #865

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You're speaking of the Triathlon Mod-A of course...somewhat different than the original, yes.

IMHO, an upgrade that really didn't need to happen.



When did this MOD happen? If you don't mind me asking.



Brian...you're a senior rigger and you're asking me? :$
I have no clue as to when Aerodyne implemented the Mod-A but I'll contact Aerodyne and find out for you, if you like...or better yet, that's something you could do, eh? My Tri's DOM was 2001. The Mod-A Tri's were later, of course.

I'm sure you already know what the Mod-A is and what it does for the canopy/pilot. I learned all about it the hard way and with some teaching from a couple of well-qualified riggers.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Brian...you're a senior rigger and you're asking me? :$



Jumpers, Riggers (SR and MR) learn where there seems to be knowledge. I like to believe I am a very competent rigger, but hardly know everything about all sport gear... That's why we ask questions. B|

And POP's folks sometimes remember more than we will know for a long time (and sometimes they can't remember what canopy they're flying at the time ;))

JW (not POPs... yet...)
Always remember that some clouds are harder than others...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At the risk of starting a new thread and pissing someone off, I want to ask another loosely related question.

I've been offered my first partial set of gear. I'll still have to do some searching to piece it together, but it looks like it's A-game. Rig was built in 1990, reserve's a little older. For those of you who have been in the sport for a long time, here's a good one for you. The reserve is a 7-cell 170 Firelite, pre-dating the entity that is Flight Concepts. Again, summarizing, pre-1990 Firelite 170 7-cell reserve. How's it gonna compare to... say, a PD Reserve of a similar size?
"If at first you don't succeed... well, so much for skydiving." - aviation cliche

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Presumably it'll handle a lot worse, although
I don't know the firelite design so I ,might be wrong about that. For instance I think the old PdF reserves the transfair and the mayday actually are pretty good even compared to modern techno's and pd-r's.

Anyway, do not load any reserve that old above 1:1 it's not made for it.

ciel bleu,
Saskia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0