Zipp0 1 #1 November 20, 2007 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/17/national/main3517564.shtml?source=mostpop_story Maybe he should have held them at gunpoint, but maybe they charged him or threatened him somehow. Either way, I support his actions. Had he not done anything, this would be yet another unsolved crime that the police don't even attempt to solve. Who knows what these crooks might have done next. Both had priors for drugs. 2 scumbags off the streets, permanently. Maybe the cops will work on reducing that 911 response time. That might have prevented the shootings, or maybe the police would have been on the trigger. They would have tazed the shit outta them, at least. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #2 November 20, 2007 Well, I personnally would not charge the man. But I think its very possible a Grand Jury will bring charges against him. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zipp0 1 #3 November 20, 2007 QuoteWell, I personnally would not charge the man. But I think its very possible a Grand Jury will bring charges against him. It IS Texas, so maybe not. -------------------------- Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #4 November 20, 2007 Quote Quote Well, I personnally would not charge the man. But I think its very possible a Grand Jury will bring charges against him. It IS Texas, so maybe not. Were those two victims illegal Mexican immigrants? If yes, let him go. "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flacid_Monk 0 #5 November 20, 2007 WTF So it's ok to kill people for burglary now is it? It wasn't anything to do with him, he wasn't in any danger if he stayed in his own house, the police were on their way... he should be tried for murder Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DZJ 0 #6 November 21, 2007 QuoteUnder Texas law, people may use deadly force to protect their own property or to stop arson, burglary, robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night. Criminal mischief? Has anyone the foggiest idea what that mean? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #7 November 21, 2007 QuoteQuoteUnder Texas law, people may use deadly force to protect their own property or to stop arson, burglary, robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night. Criminal mischief? Has anyone the foggiest idea what that mean? I'm sure it is defined by the same Texas code of law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #8 November 21, 2007 QuoteUnder Texas law, people may use deadly force to protect their own property or to stop arson, burglary, robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night. Kewl.. the death penalty taken to new heights......only in Texas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #9 November 21, 2007 QuoteQuoteUnder Texas law, people may use deadly force to protect their own property or to stop arson, burglary, robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night. Criminal mischief? Has anyone the foggiest idea what that mean? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Mischief"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #10 November 21, 2007 Shotguns are a better choice than handguns for home defense, IMO.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #11 November 21, 2007 I find it hard to believe, but it looks like TX law may justify his actions: http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm Personally, I find what the guy did indefensible."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #12 November 21, 2007 QuoteI find it hard to believe, but it looks like TX law may justify his actions: http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm Personally, I find what the guy did indefensible. I for one am dam glad you are not a judge"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flacid_Monk 0 #13 November 21, 2007 it appears you live in a country where you can kill people for simply doing wrong..... doesn't make it right though Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #14 November 21, 2007 Per your profile, it appears you don't live in a country, well at least one that has a name. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #15 November 21, 2007 Quote it appears you live in a country where you can kill people for simply doing wrong..... doesn't make it right though That's the way it was done in the old west. Maybe Texas is still lagging behind the rest of the US in proper justice... But yeah, I think the neighbor pumping buckshot into lethal locations on the two poor bastards was over doing it. Why not just shoot them in the lower legs? They're not going anywhere after that."Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #16 November 21, 2007 QuoteQuoteWell, I personnally would not charge the man. But I think its very possible a Grand Jury will bring charges against him. It IS Texas, so maybe not. I think and maybe our lawyer friend can provide some answers, but the lengthy conversation of the dispatcher asking the man not to go outside with the gun will be some pretty damning evidence against him. (I think that was a run on sentance) I sure this is not the first time these men have caused a family financial hardship, fear that there home is no longer safe. These men paid the ultimate price for their crime, but Pasadena and the Houston area is a little safer because they no longer walk the earth. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #17 November 21, 2007 Quoteit appears you live in a country where you can kill people for simply doing wrong..... doesn't make it right though As apposed to what? Kiss the ass of the criminal? Slapping him on the hand and say please do not do it again?? Look, take a peek at the countries with the lowest crime rates and see what punishment they have for steeling. Not saying that is right either but, well, just take a look and report back ."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #18 November 21, 2007 QuoteQuoteI find it hard to believe, but it looks like TX law may justify his actions: http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm Personally, I find what the guy did indefensible. I for one am dam glad you are not a judgeThe general principle of self-defense is that a private citizen can use deadly force to protect himself or a third-party in the event that bodily injury or death is an imminent threat. There is also the Castle Doctrine that extends this to the home, allowing deadly force to be used when an intruder in attempting to break in. This is logical since an intruder breaking into an occupied home will soon be coming face to face with the occupants, presenting a threat to them. Some states have also extended that to enclosed vehicles. Now how does the burglary of an unoccupied home presents a threat of bodily injury to anyone? What the guy did was act as judge, jury, and executioner over a burglary. What if he had been mistaken about what he was seeing, and in fact what was actually happening was a neighbor breaking into his own house because he lost his keys? At night, that could easily happen. Self-defense law is intended to excuse a violent act when it is necessary to protect life and limb. What I read in this article was vigilantism."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #19 November 21, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteI find it hard to believe, but it looks like TX law may justify his actions: http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm Personally, I find what the guy did indefensible. I for one am dam glad you are not a judgeThe general principle of self-defense is that a private citizen can use deadly force to protect himself or a third-party in the event that bodily injury or death is an imminent threat. There is also the Castle Doctrine that extends this to the home, allowing deadly force to be used when an intruder in attempting to break in. This is logical since an intruder breaking into an occupied home will soon be coming face to face with the occupants, presenting a threat to them. Some states have also extended that to enclosed vehicles. Now how does the burglary of an unoccupied home presents a threat of bodily injury to anyone? What the guy did was act as judge, jury, and executioner over a burglary. What if he had been mistaken about what he was seeing, and in fact what was actually happening was a neighbor breaking into his own house because he lost his keys? At night, that could easily happen. Self-defense law is intended to excuse a violent act when it is necessary to protect life and limb. What I read in this article was vigilantism. I understand your point and you made it well. What I am trying to point out that you, as do many on this site, like to rush to a judgment with info from only the first media story. While I may have pushed the point a little, I for one will wait and see what more comes out of this in the next few days. Usually, the story line changes substantially. A good judge, would do the same"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #20 November 21, 2007 QuoteI understand your point and you made it well. What I am trying to point out that you, as do many on this site, like to rush to a judgment with info from only the first media story. While I may have pushed the point a little, I for one will wait and see what more comes out of this in the next few days. Usually, the story line changes substantially. A good judge, would do the same in this case, a transcript is published. Not sure how much the facts will change. It seems to come down to is it bad for him to confront someone that was damaging his neighbor. I like neighbors myself. Not stopping them only encourages them to rob you next. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenfly00 0 #21 November 21, 2007 QuoteQuoteit appears you live in a country where you can kill people for simply doing wrong..... doesn't make it right though As apposed to what? Kiss the ass of the criminal? Slapping him on the hand and say please do not do it again?? Look, take a peek at the countries with the lowest crime rates and see what punishment they have for steeling. Not saying that is right either but, well, just take a look and report back . “I am the punishment of God...If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.” -Ghengis Kahn----------------------- "O brave new world that has such people in it". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #22 November 21, 2007 Quote Quote Quote it appears you live in a country where you can kill people for simply doing wrong..... doesn't make it right though As apposed to what? Kiss the ass of the criminal? Slapping him on the hand and say please do not do it again?? Look, take a peek at the countries with the lowest crime rates and see what punishment they have for steeling. Not saying that is right either but, well, just take a look and report back . “I am the punishment of God...If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.” -Ghengis Kahn Wow"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #23 November 21, 2007 Quote Shotguns are a better choice than handguns for home defense, IMO. How do you know, just assume the snivel position on the floor and maybe your neighbors will call 911. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freethefly 6 #24 November 21, 2007 After hearing the actual 911 call on the news a couple of days ago it was appearant that this bozo was just itching to kill someone.The guy sounded like a nutcase when he says "Boom, your dead". This guy went outside to do only one thing and that was to kill someone who was not a threat to him. He had only one thing in mind and that was to murder someone. He planned his action before he stepped out the door and then executed that action by pulling the trigger. He committed first degree murder. THe guy he killed may had been a thief but this guy is far worst by his glee to be so anxious to kill someone. Mind you, I would had a different opinion had the burgler came into this guys house and then was shot."...And once you're gone, you can't come back When you're out of the blue and into the black." Neil Young Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #25 November 21, 2007 House burglary is dangerous in Texas. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites