pop 0 #26 December 4, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteYes, it belongs to my roommate, who spend over a year in Iraq defending us. But you don't think that he should be allowed to own it... no, no, no - that's not the liberal position they think that they can own guns, and their friends and employees can own guns. And anyone they feel sorry for, or guilty about, for that matter.... they just don't want anyone they don't personally know to own guns - it's ok in their personal circle. And Hollywood. I hope that clears it up. Wow, you got it right on the money. If I was liberal I'd use you as my example. Ah hell, if I was conservative I would use you as my example as well. Whew, good thing I am not bound to thinking in 2 ways only.7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flacid_Monk 0 #27 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Attachments: m4.jpg (36.1 KB) Details: Caliber? Barrel length? Twist rate? speed of erection? size of your penis? you certainly want to know a lot Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flacid_Monk 0 #28 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Is the owner of the M4 a member of the military or civilian law enforcement? PS: I would love to shoot an M4A1SD ... Yes, it belongs to my roommate, who spend over a year in Iraq defending us. Unless you were in Iraq with him, how was he able to defend you when you were thousands of miles away? or do you mean he was in a different country fighting an illegal war that was started for yourselves by a president who told lies about WMD's to sell it to you suckers? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #29 December 4, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Is the owner of the M4 a member of the military or civilian law enforcement? PS: I would love to shoot an M4A1SD ... Yes, it belongs to my roommate, who spend over a year in Iraq defending us. Unless you were in Iraq with him, how was he able to defend you when you were thousands of miles away? or do you mean he was in a different country fighting an illegal war that was started for yourselves by a president who told lies about WMD's to sell it to you suckers? WMD's... code word for oil!Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
br0k3n 0 #30 December 5, 2007 QuoteWhat's to keep a murderer from renting a firearm at a gun range, and walking off with it to go do his dirty deed? maybe that's where this guy got his rifle, before going shopping in Omaha yesterday.. oh and killing 10 people.... shame you werent there JR to pop a cap in his ass.. But then come to think of it, why did no one else pop a cap in this dude, afterall JR you keep saying that the US needs to be a nation of tooled up individuals to be able to protect themselves!!! So what happened here, did everyone leave there bullets at home that day??----------------------------------------------------------- --+ There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.. --+ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #31 December 6, 2007 QuoteMy oh my, such language! For someone with access to guns, you sure have quite a temper. Wow I didnt realize there was a correlation between temper and hacing access to guns. Now I know. QuoteGun ranges are owned and run by people, just like you and me. Those are people whom you would deny gun ownership rights. . This isnt a case if the business is set up as a corporation. Then any assets belong to the corporation, not people. QuoteWhat's to keep a murderer from renting a firearm at a gun range, and walking off with it to go do his dirty deed? Try that today and you will be shot on your way out. QuoteOn the other hand, if you believe that people who own gun ranges deserve some kind of special "privilege" to own guns, then why shouldn't other responsible people deserve those same privileges? We live in a capitalistic society. A gun museum is just taht...a museum. There is no reason why a gun museum shouldnt be able to own guns (If its set up as a corporation) yee haa cowboy!!!7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #32 December 6, 2007 QuoteQuoteWhat's to keep a murderer from renting a firearm at a gun range, and walking off with it to go do his dirty deed? maybe that's where this guy got his rifle, before going shopping in Omaha yesterday.. Yep, he stole it. Quotepop a cap in his ass.. Why are you talking like a gangster? Quoteyou keep saying that the US needs to be a nation of tooled up individuals to be able to protect themselves!!! Nope, that's not what I say. I want to preserve the right for each law-abiding citizen to make their own individual choice whether or not they want to carry a gun. If you don't want to own or carry one, that's fine by me. I'm not for forcing gun ownership on anyone, and I don't want anyone trying to force me to give mine up. QuoteBut then come to think of it, why did no one else pop a cap in this dude... did everyone leave there bullets at home that day?? If you wish to discuss that incident, perhaps you should go to the thread that was started on it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #33 December 6, 2007 QuoteQuoteMy oh my, such language! For someone with access to guns, you sure have quite a temper. Wow I didnt realize there was a correlation between temper and hacing access to guns. Now I know. Woosh! That's the sound of my point whizzing over your head. Actually, I was just implying that maybe it's a bit scary for someone who seems to have a quick temper like yourself, to also have ready access to a military-style assault weapon. You would seem to be exactly the type of person that you fear. QuoteQuoteGun ranges are owned and run by people, just like you and me. Those are people whom you would deny gun ownership rights. . This isnt a case if the business is set up as a corporation. Then any assets belong to the corporation, not people. Oh, so if I just incorporate, then my gun collection is okay. Got it. Corporations are run by people. They have owners. If you're going to trust those corporate owners and employees to handle firearms, then there's no reason why others can't be trusted also. Just because someone has a piece of paper saying they're a corporation, doesn't automatically make them any more safe or responsible than someone else without the piece of paper. Your position to ban individual gun ownership remains contradictory and illogical. QuoteQuoteWhat's to keep a murderer from renting a firearm at a gun range, and walking off with it to go do his dirty deed? Try that today and you will be shot on your way out. So you're in favor of the use of deadly force to prevent theft? Oh, as long as it's done by a "corporation"? QuoteQuoteOn the other hand, if you believe that people who own gun ranges deserve some kind of special "privilege" to own guns, then why shouldn't other responsible people deserve those same privileges? We live in a capitalistic society. A gun museum is just taht...a museum. There is no reason why a gun museum shouldnt be able to own guns (If its set up as a corporation) Wow, that was some sleight of hand you used there to switch the topic from gun ranges to museums. Two different things. Try to keep them straight. Gun ranges allow people to handle and shoot guns. Museums don't. Okay? Why do you have such a strong faith that the creation of a paperwork corporation somehow is going to provide such fail-safe safety and security for guns? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #34 December 6, 2007 QuoteQuoteQuoteMy oh my, such language! For someone with access to guns, you sure have quite a temper. Wow I didnt realize there was a correlation between temper and hacing access to guns. Now I know. Woosh! That's the sound of my point whizzing over your head. Actually, I was just implying that maybe it's a bit scary for someone who seems to have a quick temper like yourself, to also have ready access to a military-style assault weapon. You would seem to be exactly the type of person that you fear. QuoteQuoteGun ranges are owned and run by people, just like you and me. Those are people whom you would deny gun ownership rights. . This isnt a case if the business is set up as a corporation. Then any assets belong to the corporation, not people. Oh, so if I just incorporate, then my gun collection is okay. Got it. Corporations are run by people. They have owners. If you're going to trust those corporate owners and employees to handle firearms, then there's no reason why others can't be trusted also. Your position banning individual gun ownership remains contradictory and illogical. QuoteQuoteWhat's to keep a murderer from renting a firearm at a gun range, and walking off with it to go do his dirty deed? Try that today and you will be shot on your way out. So you're in favor of the use of deadly force to prevent theft? Oh, as long as it's done by a "corporation"? QuoteQuoteOn the other hand, if you believe that people who own gun ranges deserve some kind of special "privilege" to own guns, then why shouldn't other responsible people deserve those same privileges? We live in a capitalistic society. A gun museum is just taht...a museum. There is no reason why a gun museum shouldnt be able to own guns (If its set up as a corporation) Wow, that was some sleight of hand you used there to switch the topic from gun ranges to museums. Two different things. Try to keep them straight. Gun ranges allow people to handle and shoot guns. Museums don't. Okay? Why do you have such a strong faith that the creation of a paperwork corporation somehow is going to provide such great safety and security for guns? Look cowboy. It's really simple. We live in a society gunk ho about guns. We are also one of he most violent countries in the world. Look at murder rates. Yee haa for guns, tanks, boms, or any other warfare equipment. QuoteYou would seem to be exactly the type of person that you fear. I dont fear. I am quite secure. That's why I dont own a gun. QuoteCorporations are run by people. They have owners. If you're going to trust those corporate owners and employees to handle firearms, then there's no reason why others can't be trusted also. Your position banning individual gun ownership remains contradictory and illogical. Its eveident that you know about as much about how corporate business works, as I do about guns, tanks, bombs, etc.7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #35 December 6, 2007 John, Pop - cut it out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #36 December 6, 2007 QuoteJohn, Pop - cut it out. I like marmosets. Do you like marmosets?Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #37 December 6, 2007 QuoteJohn, Pop - cut it out. I keep telling myself I am going to quit responding to John, and I did so good for a day, but it's so tempting. From now on though no more replies to John Rich.7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #38 December 6, 2007 QuoteLook cowboy. It's really simple. We live in a society gunk ho about guns. We are also one of he most violent countries in the world. Look at murder rates. Why do you keep calling me a "cowboy"? Is everyone with a gun a cowboy to you? Is there something wrong with being a cowboy? The correct phrase is "gung ho". How do you explain the fact that there are nations with gun ownership rates the same as the U.S., but which also have low murder rates? Doesn't that throw a monkey-wrench into your belief that somehow guns and murder are correlated? QuoteI dont fear. I am quite secure. That's why I dont own a gun. But you live with someone that has an assault weapon. If you were truly going to live according to your principles, you would rid your home of that assault weapon. And you wouldn't go around brandishing it in your hands while proclaiming "Don't fuck with me!" Is that your idea of a good way to promote a gun ban? QuoteQuoteCorporations are run by people. They have owners. If you're going to trust those corporate owners and employees to handle firearms, then there's no reason why others can't be trusted also. Your position banning individual gun ownership remains contradictory and illogical. Its eveident that you know about as much about how corporate business works, as I do about guns, tanks, bombs, etc. You didn't answer the question. Corporations are only as responsible as the ethics of the people running them and working for them. We've had a lot of corporate scandals over the years, which would indicate that just because you're a corporation, doesn't mean that you always do the right thing. Yet somehow, you're clinging to this idea that if a corporation has guns, that they'll always do the right thing. So that idea does not make sense. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
