Recommended Posts
rushmc 23
QuoteAND??? They have done it without the government sticking thier nose into it. That is the whole point
Well, I remember people being pissed when the government stuck their noses into it and got rid of our Regular gas in favor of Unleaded. We survived.
And somehow I don't think that vehicle safety has come along completely without government 'interference.' We have to have those annoying airbags. People bitched about that too. They even make us wear our seatbelts. Ugh. I'm not sure what standards there are in terms of crash safety, but I'm fairly certain they're there.
Maybe Big Brother didn't interfere on vehicle weight, but somehow we were able to improve gas mileage on new vehicles while staying within stricter government standards so that we have cars that are both more eco-friendly AND safer. I think that's a good thing. Don't think it would've happened without the government sticking their nose into it. That's what I think.
Some of you post I agree with and some I do not.
While the gov has its place I do not think CAFE standards are one of those places
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 2,108
kallend 2,108
QuoteQuoteAND??? They have done it without the government sticking thier nose into it. That is the whole point
Well, I remember people being pissed when the government stuck their noses into it and got rid of our Regular gas in favor of Unleaded. We survived.
And somehow I don't think that vehicle safety has come along completely without government 'interference.' We have to have those annoying airbags. People bitched about that too. They even make us wear our seatbelts. Ugh. I'm not sure what standards there are in terms of crash safety, but I'm fairly certain they're there.
Maybe Big Brother didn't interfere on vehicle weight, but somehow we were able to improve gas mileage on new vehicles while staying within stricter government standards so that we have cars that are both more eco-friendly AND safer. I think that's a good thing. Don't think it would've happened without the government sticking their nose into it. That's what I think.
Some of you post I agree with and some I do not.
While the gov has its place I do not think CAFE standards are one of those places
How about safety standards?
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteAND??? They have done it without the government sticking thier nose into it. That is the whole point
Well, I remember people being pissed when the government stuck their noses into it and got rid of our Regular gas in favor of Unleaded. We survived.
And somehow I don't think that vehicle safety has come along completely without government 'interference.' We have to have those annoying airbags. People bitched about that too. They even make us wear our seatbelts. Ugh. I'm not sure what standards there are in terms of crash safety, but I'm fairly certain they're there.
Maybe Big Brother didn't interfere on vehicle weight, but somehow we were able to improve gas mileage on new vehicles while staying within stricter government standards so that we have cars that are both more eco-friendly AND safer. I think that's a good thing. Don't think it would've happened without the government sticking their nose into it. That's what I think.
Some of you post I agree with and some I do not.
While the gov has its place I do not think CAFE standards are one of those places
How about safety standards?
Where do you stop and where do start? That will always be debatable. How far into your life do you want government? I can see both sides of the seat belt debate. How about motor cyle helmets? Iowa still does not require them. Should Iowa require them?
(ps, I do not ride a motor cycle)
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 2,108
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteAND??? They have done it without the government sticking thier nose into it. That is the whole point
Well, I remember people being pissed when the government stuck their noses into it and got rid of our Regular gas in favor of Unleaded. We survived.
And somehow I don't think that vehicle safety has come along completely without government 'interference.' We have to have those annoying airbags. People bitched about that too. They even make us wear our seatbelts. Ugh. I'm not sure what standards there are in terms of crash safety, but I'm fairly certain they're there.
Maybe Big Brother didn't interfere on vehicle weight, but somehow we were able to improve gas mileage on new vehicles while staying within stricter government standards so that we have cars that are both more eco-friendly AND safer. I think that's a good thing. Don't think it would've happened without the government sticking their nose into it. That's what I think.
Some of you post I agree with and some I do not.
While the gov has its place I do not think CAFE standards are one of those places
How about safety standards?
Where do you stop and where do start? That will always be debatable. How far into your life do you want government? I can see both sides of the seat belt debate. How about motor cyle helmets? Iowa still does not require them. Should Iowa require them?
(ps, I do not ride a motor cycle)
You never did cite a source for your SUV safety claim in the thread I linked a few posts back (post #42 of this thread). Care to do so now?
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteAND??? They have done it without the government sticking thier nose into it. That is the whole point
Well, I remember people being pissed when the government stuck their noses into it and got rid of our Regular gas in favor of Unleaded. We survived.
And somehow I don't think that vehicle safety has come along completely without government 'interference.' We have to have those annoying airbags. People bitched about that too. They even make us wear our seatbelts. Ugh. I'm not sure what standards there are in terms of crash safety, but I'm fairly certain they're there.
Maybe Big Brother didn't interfere on vehicle weight, but somehow we were able to improve gas mileage on new vehicles while staying within stricter government standards so that we have cars that are both more eco-friendly AND safer. I think that's a good thing. Don't think it would've happened without the government sticking their nose into it. That's what I think.
Some of you post I agree with and some I do not.
While the gov has its place I do not think CAFE standards are one of those places
How about safety standards?
Where do you stop and where do start? That will always be debatable. How far into your life do you want government? I can see both sides of the seat belt debate. How about motor cyle helmets? Iowa still does not require them. Should Iowa require them?
(ps, I do not ride a motor cycle)
You never did cite a source for your SUV safety claim in the thread I linked a few posts back (post #42 of this thread). Care to do so now?
Weight, not SUVs is the point.
How far should the gov go sir?
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
billvon 3,078
If that's the case, then a hybrid is the car for you. All those batteries, low to the ground.
rushmc 23
Quote>Regardless weight has a large impact on safey.
If that's the case, then a hybrid is the car for you. All those batteries, low to the ground.
Hybrids have the largest carbon foot print to constuct, maintain and recycle of all vehicles.
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 2,108
QuoteQuote>Regardless weight has a large impact on safey.
If that's the case, then a hybrid is the car for you. All those batteries, low to the ground.
Hybrids have the largest carbon foot print to constuct, maintain and recycle of all vehicles.
Evasion - I thought you were concerned about SAFETY.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 2,108
Quote
You never did cite a source for your SUV safety claim in the thread I linked a few posts back (post #42 of this thread). Care to do so now?
Weight, not SUVs is the point.
How far should the gov go sir?
So you can't support your claim. Why not just admit it?
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Agreed, speed is the largest factor, with out a doubt
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites