billbooth 10 #1 December 3, 2007 Fun With Statistics Everyone says the world is over populated. Yet, according to figures from Wikipedia: The population of Paris, France is 2,153,600. The area of Paris is 33.56 square miles. Therefore, the population density in Paris is 64,171 people per square mile. Most people would agree that Paris is a nice place to live. There are 6,600,000,000 people on the entire earth. The area of Texas is 261,797 square miles. Therefore, if everybody in the world lived in Texas, the population density would be 25,210 people per square mile, or less than half of the population density of Paris, and the rest of the world could be a park. Of course, this totally ignores land for food production, but what the hell, I'm just having fun anyway. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,067 #2 December 3, 2007 >Therefore, if everybody in the world lived in Texas, the population >density would be 25,210 people per square mile, or less than half of the >population density of Paris, and the rest of the world could be a park. Well, you might need a farm or two. And a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #3 December 3, 2007 QuoteFun With Statistics Everyone says the world is over populated. Yet, according to figures from Wikipedia: The population of Paris, France is 2,153,600. The area of Paris is 33.56 square miles. Therefore, the population density in Paris is 64,171 people per square mile. Most people would agree that Paris is a nice place to live. . Last time I was in Paris there was a garbage collectors' strike on and it wasn't nice AT ALL! Besides, it's full of Parisiens.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gene03 0 #4 December 3, 2007 John, I have to PM Warpedskydiver about your post. At last, something the two of you will agree on. “The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. Stanislaw Jerzy Lec quotes (Polish writer, poet and satirist 1906-1966) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D22369 0 #5 December 3, 2007 a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill.*** You mean it isn't already a landfill? Roy PS: a joke....just a joke, Kansas isnt the end of the earth..... but ya can sure as hell see it from there!!!!! Roy They say I suffer from insanity.... But I actually enjoy it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #6 December 3, 2007 Quote a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill.*** You mean it isn't already a landfill? No...that would be New Jersey...and that's no joke. My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #7 December 3, 2007 Quote Quote a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill.*** You mean it isn't already a landfill? No...that would be New Jersey...and that's no joke. Yep. No doubt about that. No matter where you are, it smells like one too! "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #8 December 3, 2007 Quote PS: a joke....just a joke, Kansas isnt the end of the earth..... but ya can sure as hell see it from there!!!!! Actually its kinda like the center... so its cost effective to ship everything there Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #9 December 4, 2007 QuoteFun With Statistics Everyone says the world is over populated. Yet, according to figures from Wikipedia: The population of Paris, France is 2,153,600. The area of Paris is 33.56 square miles. Therefore, the population density in Paris is 64,171 people per square mile. Most people would agree that Paris is a nice place to live. There are 6,600,000,000 people on the entire earth. The area of Texas is 261,797 square miles. Therefore, if everybody in the world lived in Texas, the population density would be 25,210 people per square mile, or less than half of the population density of Paris, and the rest of the world could be a park. Of course, this totally ignores land for food production, but what the hell, I'm just having fun anyway. You could physically fit several times the 6.5 B people we have now, but the term is, "carrying capacity." CC is tehnumber of organisms an environment can sustain. IOW's, like Bill wrote, you would need landfills a few fields to grow things, etc..... Furthermore, when we were kids did they have smog issues other than LA, Chicago, etc? Now every city seems to have the perma-haze. I've read scientists put out CC at 9.5B, at which point we would have a hard time feeding them. Especially with energy being an issue, what if we had a hiccup, we could have major rioting which would, "adjust" the population to < the CC. We humans think we can add a little Jesus and fix everything, when other Nature rules. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iceburner 0 #10 December 4, 2007 also with the area of the world i'm thinking that takes in account the area covered in water...and the poles...etc. although i only read the last post Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stratostar 5 #11 December 4, 2007 Quote And a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill. What do ya think we're using California for already, just look at how trashy it is and makes a good burn pile too.you can't pay for kids schoolin' with love of skydiving! ~ Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #12 December 4, 2007 QuoteWe humans think we can add a little Jesus and fix everything, when other Nature rules. A good pandemic or two will solve the problem for us. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #13 December 4, 2007 War! War used to be good for population control but now, with all the precision tools and the reduction in collateral damage, war has become useless. We need another old-timey war! My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elias123 0 #14 December 4, 2007 Second."In a mad world, only the mad are sane" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #15 December 5, 2007 Quote Quote And a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill. What do ya think we're using California for already, just look at how trashy it is and makes a good burn pile too. If a good chunk of California splits away from the mainland in a catastrophic quake, sort of like as depicted by Lex Luthor in the first "Superman" movie, I propose the giant island be a landfill. "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jplaca 0 #16 December 6, 2007 Overpopulation isnt focused on the land per person idea, but rather the lack of food for people and the health of the earth. For example, it is shown that the more people there are present, the more food is neccessary. Therefore, farmers have to use industrial techniques (such as engine driven farming equipment and the spraying of pesticides) to keep up with demand. With an increased demand for food, and an increase in unorthodox farming techniques, the well-being of the earth is at stake. **this is just one aspect of overpopulation Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riddler 0 #17 December 6, 2007 QuoteWell, you might need a farm or two. And a small area (say, Kansas) as a landfill. I've heard the "everyone can fit into Texas" argument before. I contend we should have to stay confined to that area. Of course, we would have to live in our own garbage, but at least it would be contained. In Indonesia, I saw entire families that lived in piles of garbage, so I know it can be done. They built garbage shanties out of the refuge of people from the "wealthier" cities.Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #18 December 6, 2007 Quote Overpopulation isnt focused on the land per person idea, but rather the lack of food for people and the health of the earth. For example, it is shown that the more people there are present, the more food is neccessary. Therefore, farmers have to use industrial techniques (such as engine driven farming equipment and the spraying of pesticides) to keep up with demand. With an increased demand for food, and an increase in unorthodox farming techniques, the well-being of the earth is at stake. **this is just one aspect of overpopulation So true... which is why we have plagues, natural disasters, tsunamis, etc, to help us out... I know that was so wrong..."Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZeG 0 #19 December 6, 2007 Quote War! War used to be good for population control but now, with all the precision tools and the reduction in collateral damage, war has become useless. We need another old-timey war! If you ask nicely the Germans might start another one Edit: Come to think of it... The Americans seem to have taken over that role recently Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #20 December 7, 2007 I'll go get a cowboy hat and boots.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites