0
Darius11

Terrorist? What defines a person as a terrorist?

Recommended Posts

Quote

I guess its all a matter of perception.. Clinton got a blow job....Bush butt fucked the world...I guess in your mind its all equal:S:S



Thanks for proving it yet again. As I told the professor, just try to make it day by day... that nasty old BDS flare-up will go away all by itself in a few more months.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Any attempt at a valid definition of the term excludes uninformed soldiers.



I think the DoD definition posted by nerdgirl here does note exclude the possibility of uniformed soldiers or states acting as terrorists.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Thanks for proving it yet again. As I told the professor, just try to make it day by day... that nasty old BDS flare-up will go away all by itself in a few more months.



You know Mike for someone who SUPPOSEDLY did not vote for King George or is constantly saying they are ALL scum in Washington.. well other than your man in the White House.. yall shore do spend a whole lot of time supporting your down home good ole boy:S:S:S:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Thanks for proving it yet again. As I told the professor, just try to make it day by day... that nasty old BDS flare-up will go away all by itself in a few more months.



You know Mike for someone who SUPPOSEDLY did not vote for King George or is constantly saying they are ALL scum in Washington.. well other than your man in the White House.. yall shore do spend a whole lot of time supporting your down home good ole boy:S:S:S:S


*shakes head*

Another symptom... the belief that anyone that doesn't automatically join into the Bush-bashing is "supporting" Bush.

Odd... I thought the "if you aren't with us, you're against us" was a *BUSH* line?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
History has determined who is a terrorist by:

1. Who won
2. Who wrote the history

Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela come to mind. Their foes considered them terrorists in their early careers. Both are remembered by the West as Statesmen.

Major Dad
CSPA D-579

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Odd... I thought the "if you aren't with us, you're against us" was a *BUSH* line?



Hey you guys sure have used it to death in the last 7 years.... There is a differance betwixt pointing out the bullshit that some of us have done about King George for years now... and those who act like dung beetles and roll it up and revel in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Our freedom fighters wore uniforms, and clearly identified themselves. That's a big difference in military justice terms.


I think it is important to see the difference between a guerrilla and a terrorist. All terrorists are guerrilla fighters (no uniform), but not all guerrillas are terrorists (the French Resistance).



If the French resistance used any form of intimidation or violence it would make it a terrorist act....

Also all terrorists are not guerilla's....... That would mean that all terrorists are part of small independent groups. You can be a terrorist and be a part of a larger regular force.
.....And you thought Kiwis couldn't fly!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote



Our freedom fighters wore uniforms, and clearly identified themselves. That's a big difference in military justice terms.


I think it is important to see the difference between a guerrilla and a terrorist. All terrorists are guerrilla fighters (no uniform), but not all guerrillas are terrorists (the French Resistance).



If the French resistance used any form of intimidation or violence it would make it a terrorist act....



Have to disagree with you there. Using intimidation or violence does not make a terrorist. Using intimidation or violence against the civillian population would.




Quote

Also all terrorists are not guerilla's....... That would mean that all terrorists are part of small independent groups. You can be a terrorist and be a part of a larger regular force.




Not sure here. If you are part of a regular force and use incognito tactics does that not make you a guerilla?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela come to mind. Their foes considered them terrorists in their early careers. Both are remembered by the West as Statesmen.



The operative words here are 'their early careers'. They were indeed terrorists (by any definition), and were considered as such by the West. However, once their political goals were attained, they changed careers and became the statesmen the West remembers.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Have to disagree with you there. Using intimidation or violence does not make a terrorist. Using intimidation or violence against the civillian population would.



Suicide bomber going after a marine check point?
.....And you thought Kiwis couldn't fly!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0