likearock 2 #26 September 27, 2008 Quote There was no clear winner in this debate. Both candidates were coherent, and neither showed any of the weaknesses they have in previous public appearances. In many ways, the debate was more about seeing if one candidate could catch the other candidate in a moment of weakness. But McCain had none of the senior moments he's had in the past, and Obama did not come across as timid as he sometimes did in previous events. I thought that Obama did look weak towards the end of this clip when they were discussing Ahmadinejad. McCain's sarcasm was very effective there. However, I think Obama was strong enough in the rest of the debate so it didn't make that much of a difference overall. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
misaltas 0 #27 September 27, 2008 Quote Poll results for first presidential debate: Obama wins Well, I caught a glimpse of the FOX News call-in poll about an hour after the debate that had McCain "winning" at 85% to 12%. So uh, heheh, there ya go... Ohne Liebe sind wir nichts Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #28 September 27, 2008 QuoteQuote There was no clear winner in this debate. Both candidates were coherent, and neither showed any of the weaknesses they have in previous public appearances. In many ways, the debate was more about seeing if one candidate could catch the other candidate in a moment of weakness. But McCain had none of the senior moments he's had in the past, and Obama did not come across as timid as he sometimes did in previous events. I thought that Obama did look weak towards the end of this clip when they were discussing Ahmadinejad. McCain's sarcasm was very effective there. However, I think Obama was strong enough in the rest of the debate so it didn't make that much of a difference overall. That was the part that I liked the best. Sen. Obama could not get out from underneath his "no-preconditions" comment with Iran. Sen. McCain nailed it: "So let me get this straight, we sit down with Ahmadinejad, he says, 'we're going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth' and we say, 'no you're not'...oh please." It wasn't a knock out, but really showed the lack of depth in Sen. Obama's position.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #29 September 27, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote There was no clear winner in this debate. Both candidates were coherent, and neither showed any of the weaknesses they have in previous public appearances. In many ways, the debate was more about seeing if one candidate could catch the other candidate in a moment of weakness. But McCain had none of the senior moments he's had in the past, and Obama did not come across as timid as he sometimes did in previous events. I thought that Obama did look weak towards the end of this clip when they were discussing Ahmadinejad. McCain's sarcasm was very effective there. However, I think Obama was strong enough in the rest of the debate so it didn't make that much of a difference overall. That was the part that I liked the best. Sen. Obama could not get out from underneath his "no-preconditions" comment with Iran. Sen. McCain nailed it: "So let me get this straight, we sit down with Ahmadinejad, he says, 'we're going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth' and we say, 'no you're not'...oh please." It wasn't a knock out, but really showed the lack of depth in Sen. Obama's position. I agree. The "no-preconditions" statement is simply unsupportable in some circumstances and he should just let go of it. But let's face it, there's no way this election will be decided on anything other than the economy. And that puts McCain at a distinct disadvantage. Edited to add: Democrats would be very wrong to underestimate McCain's skills as a debater. He is very good at finding weaknesses and really nailing the other guy. Here's a great moment from an exchange with Romney during the primaries. He basically took Romney's tacked-on "change" message and turned it around to emphasize how many issues he's flip flopped on. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #30 September 27, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote There was no clear winner in this debate. Both candidates were coherent, and neither showed any of the weaknesses they have in previous public appearances. In many ways, the debate was more about seeing if one candidate could catch the other candidate in a moment of weakness. But McCain had none of the senior moments he's had in the past, and Obama did not come across as timid as he sometimes did in previous events. I thought that Obama did look weak towards the end of this clip when they were discussing Ahmadinejad. McCain's sarcasm was very effective there. However, I think Obama was strong enough in the rest of the debate so it didn't make that much of a difference overall. That was the part that I liked the best. Sen. Obama could not get out from underneath his "no-preconditions" comment with Iran. Sen. McCain nailed it: "So let me get this straight, we sit down with Ahmadinejad, he says, 'we're going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth' and we say, 'no you're not'...oh please." It wasn't a knock out, but really showed the lack of depth in Sen. Obama's position. I agree. The "no-preconditions" statement is simply unsupportable in some circumstances and he should just let go of it. But let's face it, there's no way this election will be decided on anything other than the economy. And that puts McCain at a distinct disadvantage. I'm not willing to resign to that yet. Neither candidate is setting the agenda yet, and depending on what happens this weekend, the mark will either go up, and stabilize very quickly (thus non-issue) or it won't (thus issue)....So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #31 September 27, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote There was no clear winner in this debate. Both candidates were coherent, and neither showed any of the weaknesses they have in previous public appearances. In many ways, the debate was more about seeing if one candidate could catch the other candidate in a moment of weakness. But McCain had none of the senior moments he's had in the past, and Obama did not come across as timid as he sometimes did in previous events. I thought that Obama did look weak towards the end of this clip when they were discussing Ahmadinejad. McCain's sarcasm was very effective there. However, I think Obama was strong enough in the rest of the debate so it didn't make that much of a difference overall. That was the part that I liked the best. Sen. Obama could not get out from underneath his "no-preconditions" comment with Iran. Sen. McCain nailed it: "So let me get this straight, we sit down with Ahmadinejad, he says, 'we're going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth' and we say, 'no you're not'...oh please." It wasn't a knock out, but really showed the lack of depth in Sen. Obama's position. I agree. The "no-preconditions" statement is simply unsupportable in some circumstances and he should just let go of it. But let's face it, there's no way this election will be decided on anything other than the economy. And that puts McCain at a distinct disadvantage. I'm not willing to resign to that yet. Neither candidate is setting the agenda yet, and depending on what happens this weekend, the mark will either go up, and stabilize very quickly (thus non-issue) or it won't (thus issue).... Sorry but it's a structural liability we're talking about. American's may be at odds about the bailout and whether or not it will help them personally. But there's one thing that almost everyone agrees on: we got in this mess because someone was asleep at the wheel. And there's no way for Republicans to finesse all those years of unconditional deregulation that they've been advocating. This economic crisis is an object lesson that we can't just let people do whatever they want in a free market. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #32 September 27, 2008 not necessarily the case. The Federal REserve is an instrument of government regulation. And by arbitrarily setting interest rates they helped us get into this situation. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #33 September 27, 2008 Quotenot necessarily the case. The Federal REserve is an instrument of government regulation. And by arbitrarily setting interest rates they helped us get into this situation. So your position is that getting rid of the Fed will lead to a more stable economy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
algboy 0 #34 September 27, 2008 QuoteSen. McCain nailed it: "So let me get this straight, we sit down with Ahmadinejad, he says, 'we're going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth' and we say, 'no you're not'...oh please." Obama blew the chance to tell McCain that the whole "wipe Israel off the map" bit is a complete fairy tail invented by the Israel-firsters, but then Obama has his hand in that cookie jar, too. So . . . all things considered, I'd say it was a tie: 0-0“Keep your elbow up!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
downwardspiral 0 #35 September 27, 2008 QuoteQuotei am not kidding ... aren't you watching the debates ? edit to add: i predict that the polls will flip shortly ... Sen. McCain towered over Sen. Obama in the debate. Everywhere you saw Sen. Obama say something akin to, "We agree" was because he was out of his depth. Sen. McCain plainly showed his grasp of the facts. Was it a knock out, no. As debates go, it was far more substantive than debates in the past. I agree. What Obama showed me last night is his foriegn policy is idealistic both militarily and diplomatically. Economically I feel Obama won even though I tend to agree with McCain's policy more than Obama's. then again I run a small business so it shouldn't be surprising that I don't want my company to have to pay more taxes. Of course I won't absorb that cost....I'm just going to pass it on to my customers. And my suppliers will pass it on to me which again I'll pass on to my customers. Everytime I hear Obama mention 95% of the American people will not have their taxes raised, I cringe because people are buying it. Pun intended.www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,989 #36 September 27, 2008 >Everytime I hear Obama mention 95% of the American people will not have >their taxes raised, I cringe because people are buying it. The American people will, in the end, pay for every penny of both Obama and McCain's tax cuts. Pretending that someone else will pay the debt can make one feel better, but has no basis in reality. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
downwardspiral 0 #37 September 27, 2008 I agree but making it more difficult and more expensive to do business is not something I would ever agree with.www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #38 September 27, 2008 QuoteI agree but making it more difficult and more expensive to do business is not something I would ever agree with. Isn't it short-sighted to look at tomorrow's taxes and not several years/decades from now? It took Clinton 8 years to go from a 250B/yr debt increase to 33B/yr increase, then King George threw it up over 500B/yr on a whim. Do you think this debt thing is a joke? Do you think it's a meaningless number? The future will show us that it certainly is not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MegaGoliath11 0 #39 September 27, 2008 the pre-conditions argument is semantics, Obama is not saying that he'll sit across from these folks and bend over and readily make concessions. He's just saying bluntly cutting off ties doesn't work. its not idealism, its reality, you can't wait to have diplomatic talks until all your major differences are resolved, In general lack of diplomatic missions to a country just polarizes the relationship into a perfect us vs. them. and any conservative voice in the country (Iran for example) gets weakened and the anti-U.S folks get stronger. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdrejhon 8 #40 September 27, 2008 Quote Dang, you're right. I was hoping to get a good X-Files episode out of this. I thought it was Star Trek -- "Scotty, I need more power!" at the LHC control panel. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GQ_jumper 4 #41 September 28, 2008 There was no clear winner in this debate. Both candidates were coherent, and neither showed any of the weaknesses they have in previous public appearances. In many ways, the debate was more about seeing if one candidate could catch the other candidate in a moment of weakness. But McCain had none of the senior moments he's had in the past, and Obama did not come across as timid as he sometimes did in previous events. Quote At least I'm not the only one who saw it that way, I wanted to see McCain mop the floor with Obama but after the debate saw it as pretty even. What saddened me was that when I saw the interviews with all the undecided voters who watched the debate about 2/3 said they though Obama won and when asked what made them lean that way their replies were along the lines of, "McCain moves his hands when he talks a lot like Bush does and I don't like that". So like I've been saying for months now, the next four years for our country are being decided by the idiots of America.History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites riddler 0 #42 September 28, 2008 Why, oh why, did McCain keep saying he was not the "Miss Congeniality" of this and that? It would make sense if Obama's VP pick was Palin, instead it just seemed like he was degrading his own partner. I wonder how that made her feel? Watch for the following lines from McCain in the next presidential debate: "I wasn't voted Miss Junior Rodeo of ..." (reference to his current wife) "I wasn't a swimsuit model for ..." (reference to his first wife)Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,989 #43 September 28, 2008 > Sen. Obama could not get out from underneath his "no-preconditions" > comment with Iran. Nor should he. I want a president who will try negotiation as a last step before going to war, rather than playing semantics games. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SpeedRacer 1 #44 September 28, 2008 Quote Why, oh why, did McCain keep saying he was not the "Miss Congeniality" of this and that? It would make sense if Obama's VP pick was Palin, instead it just seemed like he was degrading his own partner. I wonder how that made her feel? Watch for the following lines from McCain in the next presidential debate: "I wasn't voted Miss Junior Rodeo of ..." (reference to his current wife) "I wasn't a swimsuit model for ..." (reference to his first wife) Interesting statement. If you look at David Letterman when he asked why McCain blew him off, ostensibly to 'suspend his campaign to deal with the financial crisis" (only to do an interview in Washington on ABC news), Letterman said, why don't you send your VP to continue your campaign in your absence?? Which is what a VP is supposed to do when a President is called away suddenly on important business. So why didn't McCain do that with his supposed Vice President Palin????? Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,989 #45 September 28, 2008 >So why didn't McCain do that with his supposed Vice President Palin? Is that a trick question? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SpeedRacer 1 #46 September 28, 2008 Saturday Night Live did another skit about Sarah Palin http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/28/gov_palin_gets_the_snl_treatme.html Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Muenkel 0 #47 September 28, 2008 Saw a clip of it on the news this morning. Quite funny. Tina Fey is extremely hilarious. Wondering when SNL will do a skit on Biden or Obama. Should I hold my breath? _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #48 September 28, 2008 QuoteShould I hold my breath? Yes.. please do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites likearock 2 #49 September 28, 2008 QuoteSaw a clip of it on the news this morning. Quite funny. Tina Fey is extremely hilarious. Wondering when SNL will do a skit on Biden or Obama. Should I hold my breath? They did a McCain/Obama debate last night that pretty much skewered each candidate equally. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #50 September 28, 2008 Quote Wondering when SNL will do a skit on Biden or Obama. Should I hold my breath? During the Clinton Obama race, their skits pointed out the tendency to give him the easy questions, while grilling her. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
riddler 0 #42 September 28, 2008 Why, oh why, did McCain keep saying he was not the "Miss Congeniality" of this and that? It would make sense if Obama's VP pick was Palin, instead it just seemed like he was degrading his own partner. I wonder how that made her feel? Watch for the following lines from McCain in the next presidential debate: "I wasn't voted Miss Junior Rodeo of ..." (reference to his current wife) "I wasn't a swimsuit model for ..." (reference to his first wife)Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,989 #43 September 28, 2008 > Sen. Obama could not get out from underneath his "no-preconditions" > comment with Iran. Nor should he. I want a president who will try negotiation as a last step before going to war, rather than playing semantics games. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #44 September 28, 2008 Quote Why, oh why, did McCain keep saying he was not the "Miss Congeniality" of this and that? It would make sense if Obama's VP pick was Palin, instead it just seemed like he was degrading his own partner. I wonder how that made her feel? Watch for the following lines from McCain in the next presidential debate: "I wasn't voted Miss Junior Rodeo of ..." (reference to his current wife) "I wasn't a swimsuit model for ..." (reference to his first wife) Interesting statement. If you look at David Letterman when he asked why McCain blew him off, ostensibly to 'suspend his campaign to deal with the financial crisis" (only to do an interview in Washington on ABC news), Letterman said, why don't you send your VP to continue your campaign in your absence?? Which is what a VP is supposed to do when a President is called away suddenly on important business. So why didn't McCain do that with his supposed Vice President Palin????? Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,989 #45 September 28, 2008 >So why didn't McCain do that with his supposed Vice President Palin? Is that a trick question? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #46 September 28, 2008 Saturday Night Live did another skit about Sarah Palin http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/28/gov_palin_gets_the_snl_treatme.html Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #47 September 28, 2008 Saw a clip of it on the news this morning. Quite funny. Tina Fey is extremely hilarious. Wondering when SNL will do a skit on Biden or Obama. Should I hold my breath? _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #48 September 28, 2008 QuoteShould I hold my breath? Yes.. please do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #49 September 28, 2008 QuoteSaw a clip of it on the news this morning. Quite funny. Tina Fey is extremely hilarious. Wondering when SNL will do a skit on Biden or Obama. Should I hold my breath? They did a McCain/Obama debate last night that pretty much skewered each candidate equally. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #50 September 28, 2008 Quote Wondering when SNL will do a skit on Biden or Obama. Should I hold my breath? During the Clinton Obama race, their skits pointed out the tendency to give him the easy questions, while grilling her. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites