kallend 2,027 #51 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuotethe only ones i want kicked out are the multiples and the ones that are not eligible to vote. the ones that someone else made a mistake on are ok. i don't want the election to be decided by fraud. is fraud ok with you? Quote Are the Diebold machines and software ok with you?? They have been shown to be less than accurate and prone to hacking. every effort to make the voting acurate and legal should be taken. if that means paper ballots until they get the bugs worked out then so be it. www.bnd.com/breaking_news/story/508139.html Those faulty Diebold machines that can easily be hacked - is that by any chance the same Diebold who's a big GOP contributor? Well, "gosh darn it", so it is.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,027 #52 October 18, 2008 Several of the battles over registration lists have taken on a partisan tinge, including in Montana, where a state GOP official challenged nearly 6,000 voters over apparent discrepancies in their addresses. He dropped his challenge after Democrats went to court, but not before one county sent letters to hundreds of voters informing them that their registrations were in jeopardy. Now the county is trying to let them know they are eligible to cast ballots after all. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27247132/ The Republicans filed the case "with the express intent to disenfranchise voters," a federal judge said."... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #53 October 18, 2008 QuoteSeveral of the battles over registration lists have taken on a partisan tinge, including in Montana, where a state GOP official challenged nearly 6,000 voters over apparent discrepancies in their addresses. He dropped his challenge after Democrats went to court, but not before one county sent letters to hundreds of voters informing them that their registrations were in jeopardy. Now the county is trying to let them know they are eligible to cast ballots after all. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27247132/ The Republicans filed the case "with the express intent to disenfranchise voters," a federal judge said." it is not right on either end, the votes need to be leagal and counted properly. the parties are fighting over votes to try to win and all that needs to be done is to make sure the votes are leagal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,008 #54 October 18, 2008 > the ones that someone else made a mistake on are ok. Cool! So I take it you oppose the GOP efforts to throw out ballots based on spelling errors and the like? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #55 October 18, 2008 Quote> the ones that someone else made a mistake on are ok. Cool! So I take it you oppose the GOP efforts to throw out ballots based on spelling errors and the like? I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,008 #56 October 18, 2008 >I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #57 October 18, 2008 Quote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,027 #58 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #59 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases? that is why alot of states have a time period to register before the election to verify registration. also all voters should have to produce id before voting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,027 #60 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases? that is why alot of states have a time period to register before the election to verify registration. also all voters should have to produce id before voting. Why should a voter have to register a long time ahead, just in case some data entry clerk made a tipo typeo misteake mistook mastake fuk up.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #61 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases? that is why alot of states have a time period to register before the election to verify registration. also all voters should have to produce id before voting. Why should a voter have to register a long time ahead, just in case some data entry clerk made a tipo typeo misteake mistook mastake fuk up. this also gives the gov time to verify that they should be eligible to vote. give the system time to work so both sides are checked and verified. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 3 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kallend 2,027 #52 October 18, 2008 Several of the battles over registration lists have taken on a partisan tinge, including in Montana, where a state GOP official challenged nearly 6,000 voters over apparent discrepancies in their addresses. He dropped his challenge after Democrats went to court, but not before one county sent letters to hundreds of voters informing them that their registrations were in jeopardy. Now the county is trying to let them know they are eligible to cast ballots after all. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27247132/ The Republicans filed the case "with the express intent to disenfranchise voters," a federal judge said."... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #53 October 18, 2008 QuoteSeveral of the battles over registration lists have taken on a partisan tinge, including in Montana, where a state GOP official challenged nearly 6,000 voters over apparent discrepancies in their addresses. He dropped his challenge after Democrats went to court, but not before one county sent letters to hundreds of voters informing them that their registrations were in jeopardy. Now the county is trying to let them know they are eligible to cast ballots after all. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27247132/ The Republicans filed the case "with the express intent to disenfranchise voters," a federal judge said." it is not right on either end, the votes need to be leagal and counted properly. the parties are fighting over votes to try to win and all that needs to be done is to make sure the votes are leagal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,008 #54 October 18, 2008 > the ones that someone else made a mistake on are ok. Cool! So I take it you oppose the GOP efforts to throw out ballots based on spelling errors and the like? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #55 October 18, 2008 Quote> the ones that someone else made a mistake on are ok. Cool! So I take it you oppose the GOP efforts to throw out ballots based on spelling errors and the like? I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,008 #56 October 18, 2008 >I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #57 October 18, 2008 Quote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #58 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #59 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases? that is why alot of states have a time period to register before the election to verify registration. also all voters should have to produce id before voting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #60 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases? that is why alot of states have a time period to register before the election to verify registration. also all voters should have to produce id before voting. Why should a voter have to register a long time ahead, just in case some data entry clerk made a tipo typeo misteake mistook mastake fuk up.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #61 October 18, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>I've never said "people shouldn't vote" only people that do it legally should vote. ?? I didn't claim you did. I just assumed that since you think it's OK for people who made spelling mistakes to vote, that you would oppose efforts (like the recent GOP effort in Montana) to purge voters off voter-registration lists (including a lot of veterans) whose names were misspelled, or had other small errors. if the person registered themselves wrong they can't vote. And how will you tell if the error was made by the voter or the people entering data in the databases? that is why alot of states have a time period to register before the election to verify registration. also all voters should have to produce id before voting. Why should a voter have to register a long time ahead, just in case some data entry clerk made a tipo typeo misteake mistook mastake fuk up. this also gives the gov time to verify that they should be eligible to vote. give the system time to work so both sides are checked and verified. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
