0
jclalor

Nova's judgment day: Intelligent design on trial

Recommended Posts

copied from http://www.religioustolerance.org/

Organized religions, more than any other human institution, can influence public behavior and moral codes -- either for good or bad.
Many organized religions lack a proper balance among their teachings of the believer's responsibilities.
Religious and political leaders should emphasize that their Ethic of Reciprocity applies to persons of all religions, not just for fellow believers.
Until the religions of the world realize that they are a main cause of hatred, strife, and genocide, the slaughters will continue unabated. Since Christian, Muslim and Hindu countries all have nuclear weapons, the need for religious tolerance is urgent.
Born ok 1st time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it was built into us and the same world over that would mean we have no free will. Ultimately your logic is flawed.

Just as one can prove that a clay pot was created so to can one prove that a electric motor was created. Just as one can prove the sequence of zeros and ones in a computer were created so to can the complex encoding of DNA was created. DNA result in complexity far beyond what we have yet to replicate through our own "creations" yet it happened by accident? No real explanation as to how just that it happened?
Once the existance of a creator or creators has be found then one simply needs to look at the historical validy or accuracy of each religion. One will actually find that the only real argument against the bible is that it simply couldn't be true. Such books as the book of daniel are believed by many to have been written after the events it predicted as it was so detailed and accurate inspite of all proof to the contrary. They simply say they can't explain it but there is no way it could have been that accurate. Although hard to come by since the scientific community doesn't want to add any validity to the bible, there is ample historical evidence for the many claims in the bible. One such example is the egyptian temple in present day Iraq where the "bagdad batteries" were found. This same temple has drawings and stories regarding the ark of the covenant. We actually have the gates to babylon and their historical writings which coinside with the bible. Historians and egyptologists have constantly said that the things written in the bible about it were untrue yet they constantly find proof to the contrary. They have discovered the signant ring of Joseph and although they claimed the numbers of horses and chariots egypt was claimed to have in the bible during the exodus was far to many they found not to long ago that egypt had far more than what was sent after the hebrews.
When one takes a truely scientific approach the only truth that can be arrived at is that of the bible. People will ignore and twist things to meet thier likings but reality does not change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If it was built into us and the same world over that would mean we have no free will. Ultimately your logic is flawed.




Hey, how is my logic flawed?


If that was the case - then no animals would ever be born with knowledge - no need for any instinctive behaviour.


Actually, your Free Will gig is such a cop out!! Especially for a jealous love noone but me type god.. If he existed and he was that controlling why would he leave such a thing to chance? He doesn't even have the support of the majority of people on his planet - gosh he must be pissed off... expect a plague of locusts any time now:S

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Just as one can prove that a clay pot was created so to can one prove that
>a electric motor was created.

A snowflake or a quartz crystal is far more orderly and symmetric than a clay pot. The Giant's Causeway is surely equal to any paved road man has created. Who created those things?

>No real explanation as to how just that it happened?

There are a great many explanations as to how it happened, and we can trace evolution back to the first protocell. Beyond that we have several good theories as to how life came to be from organic but inanimate materials.

>They have discovered the signant ring of Joseph . . .

They found the Shroud of Turin, too!

>People will ignore and twist things to meet thier likings but reality does not change.

That is certainly true. The world remains as it is no matter what someone believes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see nothing obvious about it at all. Do you have any evidence that awareness and wisdom came from a singularity?



The fact that you are sitting there and discussing the issues is evidence of some sort. Assigning your creative self awareness to a favorable chance combinations of quarks and electrons can't be proved, and is to much of a stretch for me.

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Thanks Marg - appreciated as always. Any chance of a link to give me more time to read them all???:)



You're most welcome, altho' I'm a lil' confused (I included links) ... but to be more explicit:
-- http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11876
-- http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/
-- http://www.anthro.utah.edu/PDFs/Papers/khnbj05.pdf
-- http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/altruism-biological/

VR/Marg


Er, sorry - it was a little joke - as in a link to somewhere/something which would allow one to gain more time, so as to be able to read the already provided links without any rush.
I'll get my coat. . . .:$

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I see nothing obvious about it at all. Do you have any evidence that awareness and wisdom came from a singularity?



The fact that you are sitting there and discussing the issues is evidence of some sort. Assigning your creative self awareness to a favorable chance combinations of quarks and electrons can't be proved, and is to much of a stretch for me.

...

The fact that I am sitting here discussing the issue is only evidence that I have enough awareness and the minimal wisdom required to perform the task. It is in no way evidence of any kind of where either originated.
Of course, some will say that in my case both are absent. :P
Don't be overwhelmed by the statistical odds of something as mysterious as life happening just by chance. The fact that we are here shows that, no matter what the odds were against it happening here, it happened.
I consider myself agnostic. Though I am not religious by any means, I have not eliminated entirely the chance of there being a Great Creator. The odds are certainly against it, but until it can be disproven (unlikely) it still has to be on the list of possibilities. Waaaay down at the bottom, and getting lower all the time, but it is still there.
HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Explain your assertion that Jesus was nothing more than charismatic. If you want to use Mohammed as another example of a charismatic 'phenomena' that's fine.



He got a lot of people to dedicate their lives to him and write stuff about how great he was. Sounds pretty charismatic to me.


C'mon, that's an answer a child might give to the question. '...write stuff about how great he was...' Duh!;)

There was a bit more to it than that. Whether you're an atheist or not.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because wisdom and awareness don't even exist in the way that matter and energy do. You can't go and quantify a bit of awareness, you can't make any laws that describe the behaviour of wisdom.



In case you haven't noticed, we are still in the metaphysical stone age. We have some handed down bits of wisdom on how to manipulate the metaphysical environment, but lack the knowledge to describe and measure it. Just saying "it doesn't exist then", is lame. Just think of the enlightened discussions we would of had around the camp fire 10,000 years ago regarding natural laws.


...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Seeing how there is not one bit of evidence of a metaphysical anything I think your "metaphysical stone age" is just bullshit.



The fact that you have created an opinion is metaphysical. Show me any neuroscientist that has generated even the slightest thought in stimulated nerve tissue out side of a living host. If all that is required is nerve tissue, a dash of neurotransmitter and a few mEq what is the big deal?

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> Show me any neuroscientist that has generated even the slightest thought
>in stimulated nerve tissue out side of a living host.

Oct. 22, 2004 — A University of Florida scientist has created a living "brain" of cultured rat cells that now controls an F-22 fighter jet flight simulator.

Scientists say the research could lead to tiny, brain-controlled prosthetic devices and unmanned airplanes flown by living computers.

And if scientists can decipher the ground rules of how such neural networks function, the research also may result in novel computing systems that could tackle dangerous search-and-rescue jobs and perform bomb damage assessment without endangering humans.

“The end result is a neural network that can fly the plane to produce relatively stable straight and level flight.”

Additionally, the interaction of the cells within the lab-assembled brain also may allow scientists to better understand how the human brain works. The data may one day enable researchers to determine causes and possible non-invasive cures for neural disorders, such as epilepsy.

For the recent project, Thomas DeMarse, a University of Florida professor of biomedical engineering, placed an electrode grid at the bottom of a glass dish and then covered the grid with rat neurons. The cells initially resembled individual grains of sand in liquid, but they soon extended microscopic lines toward each other, gradually forming a neural network — a brain — that DeMarse says is a "living computational device."

The brain then communicates with the flight simulator through a desktop computer.

"We grow approximately 25,000 cells on a 60-channel multi-electrode array, which permits us to measure the signals produced by the activity each neuron produces as it transmits information across this network of living neurons," DeMarse told Discovery News. "Using these same channels (electrodes) we can also stimulate activity at each of the 60 locations (electrodes) in the network. Together, we have a bidirectional interface to the neural network where we can input information via stimulation. The network processes the information, and we can listen to the network's response."

The brain can learn, just as a human brain learns, he said. When the system is first engaged, the neurons don't know how to control the airplane; they don't have any experience.

But, he said, "Over time, these stimulations modify the network's response such that the neurons slowly (over the course of 15 minutes) learn to control the aircraft. The end result is a neural network that can fly the plane to produce relatively stable straight and level flight."

At present, the brain can control the pitch and roll of the F-22 in various virtual weather conditions, ranging from hurricane-force winds to clear blue skies.

Not Science Fiction
This brain-controlled plane may sound like science fiction, but it is grounded in work that has been taking place for more than a decade. A breakthrough occurred in 1993, when a team of scientists created a Hybrot, which is short for "hybrid robot."

The robot consisted of hardware, computer software, rat neurons, and incubators for those neurons. The computer, programmed to respond to the neuron impulses, controlled a wheel underneath a machine that resembled a child's toy robot.

Last year, U.S. and Australian researchers used a similar neuron-controlled robotic device to produce a "semi-living artist." In this case, the neurons were hooked up to a drawing arm outfitted with different colored markers. The robot managed to draw decipherable pictures — albeit it bad ones that resembled child scribbles — but that technology led to today's fighter plane simulator success.

Steven Potter, an assistant professor of biomedical engineering at Georgia Tech who directed the living artist project, believes DeMarse's work is important, and that such studies could lead to a variety of engineering and neurobiology research goals.

"A lot of people have been interested in what changes in the brains of animals and people when they are learning things," Potter said. "We're interested in getting down into the network and cellular mechanisms, which is hard to do in living animals. And the engineering goal would be to get ideas from this system about how brains compute and process information."

Though the "brain" can successfully control a flight simulation program, more elaborate applications are a long way off, DeMarse said.

"We're just starting out. But using this model will help us understand the crucial bit of information between inputs and the stuff that comes out," he said. "And you can imagine the more you learn about that, the more you can harness the computation of these neurons into a wide range of applications."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

If you don't believe in God, what was Jesus then? What was so special about the man?



Nothing. I thought you'd have figured out how atheism works by now.



You can be special without being a god, and even have delusions of godness. Examples would be Augustus Caesar, Caligula, Douglas Macarthur, etc.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

If you don't believe in God, what was Jesus then? What was so special about the man?



Nothing. I thought you'd have figured out how atheism works by now.



You can be special without being a god, and even have delusions of godness. Examples would be Augustus Caesar, Caligula, Douglas Macarthur, etc.



To be fair, Augustus did become a god.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Because wisdom and awareness don't even exist in the way that matter and energy do. You can't go and quantify a bit of awareness, you can't make any laws that describe the behaviour of wisdom.



In case you haven't noticed, we are still in the metaphysical stone age. We have some handed down bits of wisdom on how to manipulate the metaphysical environment,



Eh?

Quote

we would of had around the camp fire 10,000 years ago regarding natural laws.



"Have," people - it's "have."
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0