0
Amazon

Who Has Really Benefitted From The Iraq War?

Recommended Posts

Quote

Ever hear the term CONSENTING adult???

Obviously not..



Was not good enough for a Gay memeber of Congress now was it........
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


So, sexual assualt is excused, so long as it's a Democrat committing the crime?


Seriously, that's just embarrassing.


As well as having an illegal work for you (which got an R denided a post)

As well as tax issues (that got an R in trouble and denied a post)

And the list goes on. I would guess you are not surprised however[:/]

And that post was even worse. Don't let the facts cloud your judgment.


Yes, are not facts a nasty little disruption......

Either we're having two different discussions or.....
Forget it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if he is one of the GOAT FUCK STUPID right wing rePUBICans.... who run on FAMILY VALUES... and hope to get VALUES VOTERS to vote for them... and then get caught trying to pick up a VICE COP:D:D:D:D

Then again.. I do wonder how many of those VALUES types really ARE GAY... like Mr Guckert the right wing White House reporter who was a GAY Prostitue on the side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

DUDE.. I cant believe that NO ONE in IOWA gets blow jobs.. but then again.. it is flyover land... so maybe not.



Avoided yet another point with the "blow job" defense.

I used to think you could do better
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Not if he is one of the GOAT FUCK STUPID right wing rePUBICans.... who run on FAMILY VALUES... and hope to get VALUES VOTERS to vote for them... and then get caught trying to pick up a VICE COP:D:D:D:D



I think that proves his point. Clinton cheating on his wife and commiting perjury is fine in your eyes. A married man trying to pick up dudes in the bathroom is the end of the world because you think he's GOAT FUCK STUPID.

Pretty much defines double standard.

--------------------------------------------------
Stay positive and love your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


So, sexual assualt is excused, so long as it's a Democrat committing the crime?


Seriously, that's just embarrassing.



Not to the Dems, evidently - just look at Jeanne making excuses for him.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why did I KNOW.. you and others in the Party of Morality would TOTALLY miss the point:S:S:S:ph34r:


If you wanted to impeach EVERY rePUBICan that cheated on his wife... there would no longer be a party.... just the closeted gay boys that are there.



So what you're saying is that cheating on your wife and lying about it is ok because people on both sides of the isle do it?

What Clinton did was wrong on all counts. What bathroom boy and Spitzer did wer equally wrong.

I think they should all be called out and punished. The difference is that you'll spend the next few posts justifying why you think Clinton wasn't wrong. I doubt it's because you actually think it's ok. It's just because he's a dem and the Party of Blame Everyone But Youself can do no wrong in your eyes.

--------------------------------------------------
Stay positive and love your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No.. I am a JUDGE them on the job they are doing.. and I DONT GIVE A FUCK what they do in their bedrooms...


UNLESS they pretend to be holier than thou.. and make a HUGE point of CAMPAIGNING on HOW HOLY THEY ARE... then when they get caught... FUCK EM UP and get rid of them as fast as you can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why did I KNOW.. you and others in the Party of Morality would TOTALLY miss the point:S:S:S:ph34r:


If you wanted to impeach EVERY rePUBICan that cheated on his wife... there would no longer be a party.... just the closeted gay boys that are there.



you have no point to miss.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No.. I am a JUDGE them on the job they are doing.. and I DONT GIVE A FUCK what they do in their bedrooms...


UNLESS they pretend to be holier than thou.. and make a HUGE point of CAMPAIGNING on HOW HOLY THEY ARE... then when they get caught... FUCK EM UP and get rid of them as fast as you can.



So they can do whatever illegal shit they want as long as they're doing a good job in office?

And they're only in the wrong if they're a Republican?

--------------------------------------------------
Stay positive and love your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No.. I am a JUDGE them on the job they are doing.. and I DONT GIVE A FUCK what they do in their bedrooms...


UNLESS they pretend to be holier than thou.. and make a HUGE point of CAMPAIGNING on HOW HOLY THEY ARE... then when they get caught... FUCK EM UP and get rid of them as fast as you can.



Remember this post?

Evidently, "No" doesn't mean "no" when the assaulter is a Democrat.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


So, sexual assualt is excused, so long as it's a Democrat committing the crime?


Seriously, that's just embarrassing.



Not to the Dems, evidently - just look at Jeanne making excuses for him.


You've got to be kidding with this.



No, I'm not "kidding". I don't consider sexual assault something to "kid" about, and I don't give the assaulter a pass due to their political party, unlike some.

Eileen Wellstone, 1969
Unnamed Yale student, 1972
Unnamed Univeristy of Arkansas student, 1974
Juanita Broaddrick, 1978
At least 7 different Arkansas women, 1978-1980
Carolyn Moffet, 1979
Elizabeth Ward, 1981 or 1982
Paula Corbin (Paula Jones)
Sandra Allen James, 1991
Christy Zercher, 1992
Kathleen Willey, 1993

Google it.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


History will judge him. The Bush bashers will have to lobby and wait



The American voter has judged him, and not in the positive.



Dont mean shit!!!

EVEN if what you just posted made any sense at all. (remember, Bush was not running)

And given the one sided drive by media crap that got Obama elected, what do you expect?



We've never elected a woman or a minority before as President, and rarely have we elected someone with such limited experience in office.

He ran against a long known, well respected (even on the Democrat side) war vet who basically ran on the Bush platform and got his ass handed to him.

Throw in the 2006 election results as well.

The pattern is quite clear, and quite obviously a response to the Bush Administration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why did I KNOW.. you and others in the Party of Morality would TOTALLY miss the point:S:S:S:ph34r:


If you wanted to impeach EVERY rePUBICan that cheated on his wife... there would no longer be a party.... just the closeted gay boys that are there.



What do you find wrong with being gay?
I can't recall anybody being impeached for being gay or for adultry during my lifetime, only for perjury in a sexual harrassment lawsuit in which he was the defendent.
HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


No, I'm not "kidding". I don't consider sexual assault something to "kid" about, and I don't give the assaulter a pass due to their political party, unlike some.


But you have no problem saying someone is guilty of sexual assault even when they have never been charged with it as long as they are a democrat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

What part of BEDROOMS do you not understand???:S:S:S:S



Funny...his bedroom had a bookshelf, microphones, and video cameras.;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs

I've said it before. I could care less if WIlly wanted to bang every intern at the WHite House. That was his business. It's the lies.
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

What do you find wrong with being gay?
I can't recall anybody being impeached for being gay or for adultry during my lifetime, only for perjury in a sexual harrassment lawsuit in which he was the defendent.




Sheesh... Personally I dont give a rats ass if someone is gay... BUT .. if they are a closeted asshole who does everything he can to persecute gay people yet every chance he gets he take the hershy highway....( look up Mayor of Spokane) and then spends his time campaigning based on his MORALS... yeah.. there is a HUGE problem with that.

You guys on the other hand... want to waste the entire countries time and MONEY based on stupid shit because some young woman gets off on smoking the pole of a powerful politician. It happens ALL over the world... MOST people enjoy that sort of thing....YES there is a difference.. THe entire WORKLD was laughing at the USA because of this Puritanical bullshit. Most countries dont pay so much attention to the sexual habits of their politicians. I wonder how many of you would REALLLY want to live in the theocratic hellhole you would like to take all of us to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


So, sexual assualt is excused, so long as it's a Democrat committing the crime?


Seriously, that's just embarrassing.



Not to the Dems, evidently - just look at Jeanne making excuses for him.


You've got to be kidding with this.



No, I'm not "kidding". I don't consider sexual assault something to "kid" about, and I don't give the assaulter a pass due to their political party, unlike some.

Eileen Wellstone, 1969
Unnamed Yale student, 1972
Unnamed Univeristy of Arkansas student, 1974
Juanita Broaddrick, 1978
At least 7 different Arkansas women, 1978-1980
Carolyn Moffet, 1979
Elizabeth Ward, 1981 or 1982
Paula Corbin (Paula Jones)
Sandra Allen James, 1991
Christy Zercher, 1992
Kathleen Willey, 1993

Google it.



That is the part that will be immediately ignored.

The complete discussion goes like this:
"Say anything about Clinton..."
"You guys are sexually inhibited because of BlowJobs"
"What? We mentioned an issue."
"He got a blowjob from Monica."
"He sexually assaulted, groped, or attempted to rape a litany of women."
"We only talk about Monica."

Technique:
Issues are avoided.
Facts regarding his history of serial sexual abuse are avoided. (Ever hear a negative word from the NOW about Clinton?)
I can understand why they won't discuss issues.

Osama's favorite president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the whole guilty until proven innocent is on all of your minds.


Where are the convictions..

People can claim anything they want... and as a poor boy I would think he stood a hell of a lot better chance of getting convicted of something... rather than like the Shrub.. who even when convicted of something got the records expunged:S:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


History will judge him. The Bush bashers will have to lobby and wait



The American voter has judged him, and not in the positive.



Dont mean shit!!!

EVEN if what you just posted made any sense at all. (remember, Bush was not running)

And given the one sided drive by media crap that got Obama elected, what do you expect?



We've never elected a woman or a minority before as President, and rarely have we elected someone with such limited experience in office.

He ran against a long known, well respected (even on the Democrat side) war vet who basically ran on the Bush platform and got his ass handed to him.

Throw in the 2006 election results as well.

The pattern is quite clear, and quite obviously a response to the Bush Administration.



If you think that the R's nominee was a reflextion on Bush I have to ask where the hell do you get your news/info? (sorry, I do not mean to come across as snotty) McCain was a joke at best. As far at that goes, when it comes to conservatism, Bush was a joke. So, IMO this election (while maybe dealing with the two I post to) has nothing to do with I think you are implying.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0