likearock 2 #1 June 13, 2009 Unbelievable. Anyone remember this? And it's a big shock to the right wing when some people associate their views with racism. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LongWayToFall 0 #2 June 13, 2009 Hahahaha. Funny, but if you are in politics you can't be sayin that shit. Shoulda had someone else say it instead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
downwardspiral 0 #3 June 13, 2009 The guy is a racist but not because of the political party he runs with.www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #4 June 13, 2009 Maybe Letterman should've said it. QuoteAnd it's a big shock to the right wing when some people associate their views with racism. Remind me again - WHICH party is it that basically tells minorities "you can't succeed without our help"?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #5 June 13, 2009 First, the guy is nuts and the fact that he is nuts he could change his mind tomorrow and claim he is a Democrat or Libertarian. In other words, I wouldn't pay any attention to the nutjob who's talking to himself on the subway. Second, According to Darwin all of our ancestors are gorillas, apes, monkeys, etc. _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #6 June 13, 2009 Quote QuoteAnd it's a big shock to the right wing when some people associate their views with racism. Remind me again - WHICH party is it that basically tells minorities "you can't succeed without our help"? You want to stretch the definition of racism to include affirmative action? Fine. I'll take that kind of racism over a hate-filled shotgun blast any day of the week. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royd 0 #7 June 14, 2009 QuoteThe guy is a racist but not because of the political party he runs with.Maybe, he's just an evolutionist. Seems to fit in perfectly with the liberal teaching. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #8 June 14, 2009 QuoteQuote QuoteAnd it's a big shock to the right wing when some people associate their views with racism. Remind me again - WHICH party is it that basically tells minorities "you can't succeed without our help"? You want to stretch the definition of racism to include affirmative action? Fine. I'll take that kind of racism over a hate-filled shotgun blast any day of the week. Go look up any of Ted Rall's cartoons about Bush as a crazed chimp, or Condoleza Rice as a 'house nigger', then get back to me with your protests of them and I may have some sympathy.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryzflies 0 #9 June 14, 2009 QuoteQuoteThe guy is a racist but not because of the political party he runs with.Maybe, he's just an evolutionist. Seems to fit in perfectly with the liberal teaching. If evolution is liberal teaching it must mean that neolithic mythology is conservative teaching.If you can't fix it with a hammer, the problem's electrical. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #10 June 14, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote QuoteAnd it's a big shock to the right wing when some people associate their views with racism. Remind me again - WHICH party is it that basically tells minorities "you can't succeed without our help"? You want to stretch the definition of racism to include affirmative action? Fine. I'll take that kind of racism over a hate-filled shotgun blast any day of the week. Go look up any of Ted Rall's cartoons about Bush as a crazed chimp, or Condoleza Rice as a 'house nigger', then get back to me with your protests of them and I may have some sympathy. +1 Same story, different thread. .....now where is that irony meter Quade talked about......"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nerdgirl 0 #11 June 14, 2009 Quote … According to Darwin all of our ancestors are gorillas, apes, monkeys, etc. > Homo sapiens sapiens (us) direct ancestor is Australopithecus spp. not gorillas, apes, or monkeys. The evolutionary lines between modern humans and gorillas, apes, monkeys, chimpanzees or bonobos split 5-7 million years ago. /Marg Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters. Tibetan Buddhist saying Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #12 June 15, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote QuoteAnd it's a big shock to the right wing when some people associate their views with racism. Remind me again - WHICH party is it that basically tells minorities "you can't succeed without our help"? You want to stretch the definition of racism to include affirmative action? Fine. I'll take that kind of racism over a hate-filled shotgun blast any day of the week. Go look up any of Ted Rall's cartoons about Bush as a crazed chimp The likening of black people to apes has been a fixture in one of the worst chapters of America's past. It has been used as a basis for slavery, lynchings, and other unspeakable acts of violence. More recently, von Brunn's cheering section has shown no qualms about using that comparison: Quote Yes, JVB only killed a stupid ape in a jewniform but it was for ALL white folk that he made this sacrifice. Any cartoon showing Bush in an apelike way, though insulting and disrespectful, is nowhere near equivalent. If you can't see the distinction I guess your politics are a lot more extreme than I thought. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #13 June 15, 2009 Common ancestry, not directly descended." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomAiello 26 #14 June 15, 2009 QuoteThe likening of black people to apes has been a fixture in one of the worst chapters of America's past. Not just America. If I recall correctly, Karl Marx used such a slur to describe a candidate for office in Paris , who had some (I think it was about a quarter) african ancestry.-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,490 #15 June 15, 2009 QuoteFirst, the guy is nuts and the fact that he is nuts he could change his mind tomorrow and claim he is a Democrat or Libertarian. Really? Sounds like the guy's been a Republican all his life but yeah, I'm sure it's just a whim. QuoteSecond, According to Darwin all of our ancestors are gorillas, apes, monkeys, etc. Uh, no. First, it's not 'according to Darwin', it's reality. Second, we're not descended from gorillas or monkeys and we actually are apes.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FreeflyChile 0 #16 June 15, 2009 QuoteQuoteThe likening of black people to apes has been a fixture in one of the worst chapters of America's past. Not just America. If I recall correctly, Karl Marx used such a slur to describe a candidate for office in Paris , who had some (I think it was about a quarter) african ancestry. Not even that long ago either - fairly recently soccer teams in Spain were getting into trouble when their fans would make monkey or ape noises at opposing black players. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #17 June 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteThe likening of black people to apes has been a fixture in one of the worst chapters of America's past. Not just America. If I recall correctly, Karl Marx used such a slur to describe a candidate for office in Paris , who had some (I think it was about a quarter) african ancestry. KMDIF - a new twist to a tried and true dodge. It doesn't matter who else did it. Republicans shouldn't be making these kind of statements, especially not now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,447 #18 June 16, 2009 QuoteRepublicans shouldn't be making these kind of statements, especially not nowActually, this kind of statement is classless, and no one, Republocrat, Demolican, Libertarianist, or Communarian, should be making them. They add no substance to the debate. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbrown 26 #19 June 17, 2009 Nothing a Republic-hole says surprises me. they're the White People's Partei and are currently undergoing an ideological purge to drive out their last voices of moderation. Soon only the purest blooded Aryan assholes will remain. They're SO fuckin' stupid they don't even realize what a good looking woman the Firs Lady is. But they're not as stupid as they're just plain EVIL. Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #20 June 17, 2009 QuoteNothing a Republic-hole says surprises me. they're the White People's Partei and are currently undergoing an ideological purge to drive out their last voices of moderation. Soon only the purest blooded Aryan assholes will remain. They're SO fuckin' stupid they don't even realize what a good looking woman the Firs Lady is. But they're not as stupid as they're just plain EVIL. White people's party? (see attached) Yeah, he's REALLY a "purest blooded Aryan asshole", isn't he? He's the one that was called an "Oreo" by the oh-so-tolerant people that YOU align with - the same people that called Condoleezza Rice "Aunt Jemima" and "house nigger", and Colin Powell "Uncle Tom". You just became the living embodiment of the "open your mouth and remove all doubt" quote.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chasteh 0 #21 June 17, 2009 How many wealthy white men do you suppose are there leading the republican party as opposed to those who aren't? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #22 June 17, 2009 QuoteHow many wealthy white men do you suppose are there leading the republican party as opposed to those who aren't? How many wealthy white men do you suppose are there leading the DEMOCRAT party as opposed to those who aren't? "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chasteh 0 #23 June 17, 2009 I would guess fewer than the number who are republicans. Do you know? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #24 June 17, 2009 QuoteUsing Internal Revenue Service data, the Heritage Foundation identified two categories of taxpayers - single filers with incomes of more than $100,000 and married filers with incomes of more than $200,000 - and combined them to discern where the wealthiest Americans live and who represents them. Democrats now control the majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional jurisdictions. More than half of the wealthiest households are concentrated in the 18 states where Democrats control both Senate seats.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #25 June 17, 2009 >Democrats now control the majority of the nation's wealthiest >congressional jurisdictions. More than half of the wealthiest households >are concentrated in the 18 states where Democrats control both Senate >seats. Looks like Democrats are becoming the party of the rich and successful. Interesting change. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites