0
dreamdancer

Profiling CEOs and Their Sociopathic Paychecks

Recommended Posts

And one more for the rock pile.

I expected at least alittle bit more from you, considering at least a few of your posts have had more content in the last few days. My mistake.

Theres a rock for you, too, Turtlespeed.
edit: How does Kennedy's being a democrat demonstrate the generalization? It surely shows one democrat has showed socialistic tendencies. So have Bush and Reagan. Does that mean that I can make a generalization about how republicans are socialists? No. I can only say a few.

Rush: Also, way to go on weakening your statement. Who would have thought, there are some (AKA At least one) democrats such that they have socialistic tendencies. Does that mean you can accurately say the democratic party is? No. You realized this and said you meant to say something else.

What value, otherwise, does saying that democrats=progressives=socialists give us? Nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And one more for the rock pile.

I expected at least alittle bit more from you, considering at least a few of your posts have had more content in the last few days. My mistake.

Theres a rock for you, too, Turtlespeed.
edit: How does Kennedy's being a democrat demonstrate the generalization? It surely shows one democrat has showed socialistic tendencies. So have Bush and Reagan. Does that mean that I can make a generalization about how republicans are socialists? No. I can only say a few.

Rush: Also, way to go on weakening your statement. Who would have thought, there are some (AKA At least one) democrats such that they have socialistic tendencies. Does that mean you can accurately say the democratic party is? No. You realized this and said you meant to say something else.

What value, otherwise, does saying that democrats=progressives=socialists give us? Nothing.



Hey dude! Where is the word "modern"? Gotta change things to make your point???

Point stands and you dig more sand.

Oh life is good!:D


:D:D

Nice tryB|

Funny, but nice try:D:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Lets see - Is it my mistake or was Kennedy not a democrat? I'm not seeing merit in his argument.



You mean this Kennedy? :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLdA1ikkoEc


Nope, not that tax cutting Kennedy. The one that is a Dem today. Not the one from the past who would be a Repulican in this time a place.
The one I would have joined my grandpa supporting!
I like THAT Kennedy:)
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>>What value, otherwise, does saying that modern democrats=progressives=socialists give us? Nothing.


>Hey dude! Where is the word "modern"? Gotta change things to make your point???

Actually, no. The point remains.

>Point stands and you dig more sand.

Yes, my point still stands. And without the use of emoticons. Schopenhauer must be your daddy or something, because you are using all of the ideas of his laid out in his Principle of Sufficient Reason. (That reason isn't needed to give us truths about the world.) The problem is, it doesn't give us much when we actually try to form arguments. It only attempts to piss the opponent off so that they will not fight anymore.

Thus, we can add another "rock" to your pile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>>What value, otherwise, does saying that modern democrats=progressives=socialists give us? Nothing.


>Hey dude! Where is the word "modern"? Gotta change things to make your point???

Actually, no. The point remains.

>Point stands and you dig more sand.

Yes, my point still stands. And without the use of emoticons. Schopenhauer must be your daddy or something, because you are using all of the ideas of his laid out in his Principle of Sufficient Reason. (That reason isn't needed to give us truths about the world.) The problem is, it doesn't give us much when we actually try to form arguments. It only attempts to piss the opponent off so that they will not fight anymore.

Thus, we can add another "rock" to your pile.



Yep, there are "rocks" in your post. But they are not in my "pile"!:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Mmmm yea. Nothin like a Bay of Pigs invasion to start off the morning.

Just out of curiousity, you consider Kennedy to not be a modern democrat?



Teddy or Johny?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"Oh life is good!

Nice try

Funny, but nice try"

There are three rocks t here. You say "Nice try" yet fail to explain yourself. Rocks. Your post. Life is good.



Dude, you are the one that left out the key word in our debate correct!

You have some splanin to do.

Oh, and yes, I see the rocks

:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Dude, you are the one that left out the key word in our debate correct!

Right, it was a mistake. Not a rock.

>You have some splanin to do.

Actually, I just did. Thanks.

>Oh, and yes, I see the rocks

Well now we know your not totally blind. A little bit goes a long ways after all. Sheesh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The only one who was responsible for the Bay of Pigs invasion.

You know what, nevermind Rush. Never. Fucking. Mind.



Victory!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The only one who was responsible for the Bay of Pigs invasion.

You know what, nevermind Rush. Never. Fucking. Mind.



Victory!


no, the bay of pigs was a defeat :)
(like vietnam and afghanistan)
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on Hold on. It isn't a defeat in Afghanistan.

Were just finding more ways to piss-off Middle-Eastern militias so that they can attack us again in 20 years. Maybe that time we will get it right, sort of like all the other empires did as they tried to consume Afghanistan.

Then it will be a victory :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"CEOs get paid too much"

"No They don't"

"They get paid too much because the government intervenes in the market, allowing a market to be exploited for specific firms only, while other people have to pay for it"

"Fair enough."

"Your wrong, Rush Limbaugh is God, and I love Jesus."

"Me too"

"So modern democrats are progressives and therefore socialists"

"What?"

"Yep."

"Nope... for X reasons"

"I still say yep."
edit
"Oh yea? Well one of your heroes is a specific example of police-state socialism at work"

"Victory!"

"What the fuck are you guys talkin about"

"See Above"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

haven't read the whole thread but... how did we just go from CEOs pay to the bay of pigs?

"CEOs get paid to much"

"No they dont"

...

"WAR AND UNRELATED HISTORY!"




Ooooh, maybe it's like a Speakers Corner version of the six degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon? :P


Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh! Satire! I haven't seen that in a while. Where is Billvon, anyways?

Perhaps you could be more clear in explaining the inconsistency you see within my post here and the post I had in the other thread.



You don't have any posts in the thread to which I was referring, so I guess there's been a misunderstanding. Any similarity between my snide remark and posts you may have made elsewhere is a coincidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0