Recommended Posts
Andy9o8 2
QuoteQuoteI'm told that my group is not yet considering me for partner because I'm not yet "meeting overhead" because of my choices on patient selection and how I have a lower "production" (as calculated by COLLECTIONS).
What changes for you when you make partner?
Generally speaking, in professional firms, partners are "management", while non-partner associates are mere employees. Policy is usually set mainly, if not solely, by management.
(Also, there usually are differences in the method/amount of partners' compensation, as contrasted with non-partner employees' compensation.)
kallend 2,027
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotePossibly, but I have doubts that such a law simply forcing all private-sector doctors and medical facilities to accept government insurance would be Constitutional.
i wondered about the constitutionallity of it, but decided not include it in my original post because i honestly don't know what part of the constitution it would violate.
as far as federal government taking the back door, there are a few states that are getting a little tired of the feds getting in to their business. in the end, i think all of this discussion is purely academic. if anything does get passed, it will have little meaningful effect.
What evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Willie Sutton.
Nice of you to equate medics with bank robbers.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 2,027
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotePossibly, but I have doubts that such a law simply forcing all private-sector doctors and medical facilities to accept government insurance would be Constitutional.
i wondered about the constitutionallity of it, but decided not include it in my original post because i honestly don't know what part of the constitution it would violate.
as far as federal government taking the back door, there are a few states that are getting a little tired of the feds getting in to their business. in the end, i think all of this discussion is purely academic. if anything does get passed, it will have little meaningful effect.
What evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Read the bill.
OK, I did that.
Now tell us which division and title FORCES medics to accept govt. insurance.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
QuoteWhat evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
???
nowhere do i claim that this plan includes this measure. i simply posed a question.
"Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama
www.kjandmegan.com
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteWhat evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Willie Sutton.
Nice of you to equate medics with bank robbers.
Spare me your oh-so-pious ethics valuations - you yourself said that Sutton went where the money was.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
kallend 2,027
Was he forced, or did he do it voluntarily? If you read the thread title you might get a clue.QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteWhat evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Willie Sutton.
Nice of you to equate medics with bank robbers.
Spare me your oh-so-pious ethics valuations - you yourself said that Sutton went where the money was.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 2,027
QuoteQuoteWhat evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
???
nowhere do i claim that this plan includes this measure. i simply posed a question.
Tell that to turtlespeed.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
QuoteWas he forced, or did he do it voluntarily? If you read the thread title you might get a clue.QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteWhat evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Willie Sutton.
Nice of you to equate medics with bank robbers.
Spare me your oh-so-pious ethics valuations - you yourself said that Sutton went where the money was.
Figure out what insurance doctors are going to take once fed.gov is the only game in town and get back to us, since we're speaking of clues and the capture of same.
Here's a net - you quite evidently need it.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
turtlespeed 221
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotePossibly, but I have doubts that such a law simply forcing all private-sector doctors and medical facilities to accept government insurance would be Constitutional.
i wondered about the constitutionallity of it, but decided not include it in my original post because i honestly don't know what part of the constitution it would violate.
as far as federal government taking the back door, there are a few states that are getting a little tired of the feds getting in to their business. in the end, i think all of this discussion is purely academic. if anything does get passed, it will have little meaningful effect.
What evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Read the bill.
OK, I did that.
Now tell us which division and title FORCES medics to accept govt. insurance.
You read ALL the pages of the bill?
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
QuoteQuoteQuoteits also not like doctors are rich either. sure,
theymost are past the point of living paycheck to paycheck, but most are still middle class. for you to suggest tthat doctors need to find another job tells me you know very little about the life of a doctor.
Amen. I think that very few people actually understand the lives of doctors. Their lifestyle sucks in many, many ways. I know I posted about this in another thread recently, so I'm not going to belabor the point, aside from saying that the people pointing fingers at "those rich doctors" probably aren't living anywhere as difficult a life.
Funny that "the best and brightest" (to quote someone on here recently) who are attracted to medicine because of the rewards (to paraphrase someone on here recently) end up having such sucky jobs.![]()
Not sucky jobs. Sucky lifestyle in many (not all) ways. The job is tough. The hours are tough. Dealing with patients not paying bills and being sued is tough. His point was pretty clear that doctors don't live paycheck to paycheck but blaming healthcare costs on their greediness is a pretty big stretch. I'm confident you knew what he meant and are just being argumentative.
--------------------------------------------------
Stay positive and love your life.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotePossibly, but I have doubts that such a law simply forcing all private-sector doctors and medical facilities to accept government insurance would be Constitutional.
i wondered about the constitutionallity of it, but decided not include it in my original post because i honestly don't know what part of the constitution it would violate.
as far as federal government taking the back door, there are a few states that are getting a little tired of the feds getting in to their business. in the end, i think all of this discussion is purely academic. if anything does get passed, it will have little meaningful effect.
What evidence do you have that the plan under consideration includes a measure forcing medics to take govt. insurance?
Read the bill.
OK, I did that.
Now tell us which division and title FORCES medics to accept govt. insurance.
You read ALL the pages of the bill?
He'd be the only one in the country to have done so.
--------------------------------------------------
Stay positive and love your life.
Could be Stick Boinker
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites