0
quade

Lockerbie bomber to be set free?!? Really?

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

What I would like to know is why he is even getting health care when honest Brits are standing in line waiting for care? Makes me wonder about the moral compass of the brit government.



Compare the nations that do give prison inmates reasonable health care, with those that do not. There's your answer.



Quote

But why would a terminally ill convicted mass killer get any medical treatment before a honest hard working citizen?



Well, all countries have debates over "Why should we spend tax money on A, when spending money on B is morally more deserving?"

But the real answer is: it's two separate arenas. One arena is the obligation of a civilized nation to provide reasonable shelter, clothing, food and medicine for its incarcerated prisoners. That obligation exists in and of itself. The other arena is what social services and programs will the government spend tax money on. The two separate arenas are not mutually exclusive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But why would a terminally ill convicted mass killer get any medical treatment before a honest hard working citizen?



We have a duty of care for people that are incarcerated.... should that be of higher priority that non-jailed folk? .... um .... not sure (If it was my family suffereing whilst some con was cared for... I could make up my mind, I sure).

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Unintentional versus premeditated. Did you catch that?


murder is murder. (was lockerbie really a surprise after this iranian airliner had been shot down)


No No No..... Unintentional versus premeditated.

That's like saying abortion and the death sentence are the same. Killing innocent babies versus a process of adjudication from a jury of peers for a crime against society are different. If you can't grasp that, then it's okay...... I just want to know.



Worst. Analogy. Ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Worst. Analogy. Ever.



Only if you refuse to accept that abortion is the premature end of a human life-otherwise, it makes perfect sense.



No, no... irrespective of my stance on abortion.

But I am laughing now (yes, out loud) because the fact that the analogy in question has the power to derail a thread about terrorism into one of abortion is but one of the things that make it the Worst. Analogy. Ever.

Unintentional : Premeditated ::

a) Automobile Fatalities : Beltway Sniper Attacks
b) Abortion : Death Penalty
c) Pancreatic Cancer : Bank Robbery Shootings
d) Iran Air 655 : Pan Am 103
e) Both a) and d)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Unintentional versus premeditated. Did you catch that?


murder is murder. (was lockerbie really a surprise after this iranian airliner had been shot down)


No No No..... Unintentional versus premeditated.

That's like saying abortion and the death sentence are the same. Killing innocent babies versus a process of adjudication from a jury of peers for a crime against society are different. If you can't grasp that, then it's okay...... I just want to know.



Worst. Analogy. Ever.



No, it was dead on

Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Worst. Analogy. Ever.



Only if you refuse to accept that abortion is the premature end of a human life-otherwise, it makes perfect sense.



No, no... irrespective of my stance on abortion.

But I am laughing now (yes, out loud) because the fact that the analogy in question has the power to derail a thread about terrorism into one of abortion is but one of the things that make it the Worst. Analogy. Ever.

Unintentional : Premeditated ::

a) Automobile Fatalities : Beltway Sniper Attacks
b) Abortion : Death Penalty
c) Pancreatic Cancer : Bank Robbery Shootings
d) Iran Air 655 : Pan Am 103
e) Both a) and d)




I think his point was that they aren't the same champ.

Well now that they released this one, It's now America's turn. Lets see..... I guess we can spin the bottle and see which terrorist gets freed from Gitmo


Hey Muhammad, why don't you wash your mouth out with a revolver!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Worst. Analogy. Ever.



Only if you refuse to accept that abortion is the premature end of a human life-otherwise, it makes perfect sense.



No, no... irrespective of my stance on abortion.

But I am laughing now (yes, out loud) because the fact that the analogy in question has the power to derail a thread about terrorism into one of abortion is but one of the things that make it the Worst. Analogy. Ever.

Unintentional : Premeditated ::

a) Automobile Fatalities : Beltway Sniper Attacks
b) Abortion : Death Penalty
c) Pancreatic Cancer : Bank Robbery Shootings
d) Iran Air 655 : Pan Am 103
e) Both a) and d)



I touched on this in the parallel thread, but Bank Robbery Shooting is not automatically premeditated. However, the death resulting from an unintentional shooting (and subsequent death) during a premeditated bank robbery could be taken as intentional (felony-murder).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I do not for one instant believe that the US Navy's radars can't tell the difference between a fighter on an attack run and an airliner climbing to altitude.



What interests were served by shooting down that passenger plane?

I can see some rational for the notion that KAL007 could have been acting as a spy plane, but I don't see the upside for this shooting. (And the Russians certainly didn't benefit from their action either)

When everyone is in a fighting stance, mistakes get made and they are deadly mistakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


For all of the above reasons sending him back was not only the humane but the most cost effective thing to do.
Sometimes you have to look at the bigger picture.



The bigger picture says that showing compassion has been remarkably ineffective with our enemies in the Middle East. We turn the other cheek, like Jesus did, and we get killed for it.

Reagan's mantra was right - peace through strength.

It would also seem clear to criminals in England that there is little punishment - which one of you wrote in the last day that the average "life" sentence in the UK was 9 years?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I do not for one instant believe that the US Navy's radars can't tell the difference between a fighter on an attack run and an airliner climbing to altitude.



What interests were served by shooting down that passenger plane?

I can see some rational for the notion that KAL007 could have been acting as a spy plane, but I don't see the upside for this shooting. (And the Russians certainly didn't benefit from their action either)

When everyone is in a fighting stance, mistakes get made and they are deadly mistakes.



the captain made the wrong decision - he could have chosen not to shoot down the civilian airliner.
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Unintentional : Premeditated ::

a) Automobile Fatalities : Beltway Sniper Attacks
b) Abortion : Death Penalty
c) Pancreatic Cancer : Bank Robbery Shootings
d) Iran Air 655 : Pan Am 103
e) Both a) and d)



I touched on this in the parallel thread, but Bank Robbery Shooting is not automatically premeditated. However, the death resulting from an unintentional shooting (and subsequent death) during a premeditated bank robbery could be taken as intentional (felony-murder).



Correct; I tried to make it as test-like as possible. c) is the "slightly tricky answer" to get rid of whereas b) is the one you'd eliminate immediately (on account of it being the Worst. Analogy. Ever.)

/edited to add... alright, alight... I'll lose the attitude. Sometimes even when I don't disagree with someone I'll give them flak about presenting an idea in a wholly unconvincing manner.

MY point was that neither abortion nor the death penalty are unintentional. Also, neither group of passengers is well represented by the elaboration in the analogy regarding due process. And finally, at the core of the analogy, we have the axiomatic statements of "abortion = killing babies" and "capital punishment given due process is perfectly fine" which are both moot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I do not for one instant believe that the US Navy's radars can't tell the difference between a fighter on an attack run and an airliner climbing to altitude.



What interests were served by shooting down that passenger plane?

I can see some rational for the notion that KAL007 could have been acting as a spy plane, but I don't see the upside for this shooting. (And the Russians certainly didn't benefit from their action either)

When everyone is in a fighting stance, mistakes get made and they are deadly mistakes.



First time I agree with Kelp.... that was my point. Mistakes are unintentional.

Here are some editorial pictures below from the AP.

Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I do not for one instant believe that the US Navy's radars can't tell the difference between a fighter on an attack run and an airliner climbing to altitude.



What interests were served by shooting down that passenger plane?



Why was an Aegis cruiser in Iranian waters anyway, in a fighting stance? Why did the Navy lie about that?

What message does it send when we give medals to the crew of a ship that killed 290 innocent civilians and then whine because a scumbag on his deathbed gets released from prison?
Quote




I can see some rational for the notion that KAL007 could have been acting as a spy plane, but I don't see the upside for this shooting. (And the Russians certainly didn't benefit from their action either)

When everyone is in a fighting stance, mistakes get made and they are deadly mistakes.


...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


What message does it send when we give medals to the crew of a ship that killed 290 innocent civilians and then whine because a scumbag on his deathbed gets released from prison?



Uh, respect for due process? A foreign court found him guilty and sentenced him to 28 years in prison.

But apparently we have more respect for their process than even they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


the captain made the wrong decision - he could have chosen not to shoot down the civilian airliner.



Sure. The USS Cole had to operate under such guidelines and it got a bunch of sailors killed. I know you don't give a shit, but most captains actually do care about their crew.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

IR655 : 290 people were not given medals and promotions:S



I never said they did...... what are you referring to?


He's repeating a common half truth that the Vincennes crew were awarded medals for killing civilians.

from wikipedia:
The men of the Vincennes were all awarded Combat Action Ribbons for completion of their tours in a combat zone. Lustig, the air-warfare coordinator, received the Navy Commendation Medal, often given for acts of heroism or meritorious service, but a not-uncommon end-of-tour medal for a second tour division officer. According to the History Channel, the medal citation noted his ability to "quickly and precisely complete the firing procedure."[35] However, in 1990, The Washington Post listed Lustig's awards as one being for his entire tour from 1984 to 1988 and the other for his actions relating to the surface engagement with Iranian gunboats. In 1990, Rogers was awarded the Legion of Merit "for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as commanding officer ... from April 1987 to May 1989." The award was given for his service as the Commanding Officer of the Vincennes, and the citation made no mention of the downing of Iran Air 655.[36] The Legion of Merit is often awarded to high-ranking officers upon successful completion of especially difficult duty assignments and/or last tours of duty before retirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


What message does it send when we give medals to the crew of a ship that killed 290 innocent civilians and then whine because a scumbag on his deathbed gets released from prison?



Uh, respect for due process? A foreign court found him guilty and sentenced him to 28 years in prison.

But apparently we have more respect for their process than even they do.



What kind of "due process" did the 290 victims of the Vincennes receive?

Your double standard is showing.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obamas comments
Quote

U.S. President Barack Obama said the Scottish decision to free terminally ill Abdel Baset al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds was a mistake and said he should be under house arrest. Obama warned Libya not to give him a hero's welcome.

Despite the warning, at the military airport in Tripoli where al-Megrahi's plane touched down, thousands of youths were on hand to warmly greet him. He left the plane wearing a dark suit and a tie and accompanied by Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's son, Saif al-Islam Gadhafi. They immediately sped off in a convoy of all-white vehicles.



Quote

There was a festive atmosphere with some wearing T-shirts with al-Megrahi's picture and waving Libyan and miniature blue-and-white Scottish flags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

[reply

The missile didn't launch itself at the airliner. Someone gave the order.



someone gave the order to launch a missle against an incoming fighter. That identification was wrong and a tragic mistake, but the order wasn't given to launch against a passenger plane (which is what you implied).

Maybe it was operator error.

I do not for one instant believe that the US Navy's radars can't tell the difference between a fighter on an attack run and an airliner climbing to altitude.


Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0