0
justinb138

"Pay to play" politics?

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Name me one corporation whose articles of incorporation give fiducial responsibility to unions rather than a board of directors.

Since NONE of you are able to do this, it's clear that you actually can't rebut my initial assertion at the beginning of this thread (post #8, #10, #20) that management, not unions, is responsible for managing companies. That is how it is IN LAW and IN FACT.

All that the rest of you have posted is hot air trying to dispute posts #8, 10 and 20, but nothing you have posted actually rebuts my original assertion.



Irrelevant. This has nothing to do with why unions strike as I have stated several times.



Completely irrelevant to the point under discussion. Please try to pay attention.
(You're playing in the wrong league.)
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Name me one corporation whose articles of incorporation give fiducial responsibility to unions rather than a board of directors.

Since NONE of you are able to do this, it's clear that you actually can't rebut my initial assertion at the beginning of this thread (post #8, #10, #20) that management, not unions, is responsible for managing companies. That is how it is IN LAW and IN FACT.

All that the rest of you have posted is hot air trying to dispute posts #8, 10 and 20, but nothing you have posted actually rebuts my original assertion.



GM, post-porkulus.



Incorrect.



Here in the reality-based community, UAW was given partial ownership...not sure what happened in YOUR world.



The have responsibility as OWNERS, as does any stockholder. They are still not, as a union, responsible for managing the company.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Name me one corporation whose articles of incorporation give fiducial responsibility to unions rather than a board of directors.

Since NONE of you are able to do this, it's clear that you actually can't rebut my initial assertion at the beginning of this thread (post #8, #10, #20) that management, not unions, is responsible for managing companies. That is how it is IN LAW and IN FACT.

All that the rest of you have posted is hot air trying to dispute posts #8, 10 and 20, but nothing you have posted actually rebuts my original assertion.



Irrelevant. This has nothing to do with why unions strike as I have stated several times.


Completely irrelevant to the point under discussion. Please try to pay attention.
(You're playing in the wrong league.)


Completely relevant. Another swing and a miss for Kallend. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0