0
kallend

GOP Purity Test

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Wow. I though this "purity test" was about not sucking dicks in public restrooms,



Nah, Barney Frank isn't a Republican.


No, but Larry Craig is. ;)

Or did you guys need to see a "transcript" of that?


No - we've been subjected to enough of your tapdancing today, thanks.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Wow. I though this "purity test" was about not sucking dicks in public restrooms,


Nah, Barney Frank isn't a Republican.

No, but Larry Craig is. ;)
Or did you guys need to see a "transcript" of that?

No - we've been subjected to enough of your tapdancing today, thanks.


I'm sure the damage isn't going to last for long. Some Republicans seem to have awfully short memories. Although, you guys can't seem to manage to forget the blow job by the fat chick. Hmmm . . . jealous?

As to "tapdancing", why the fuck would I ever be Marc's research monkey? What possible good can ever come from me showing him anything; ever? Has he ever provided any proof of his claims? Has anything we've ever showed him ever changed his mind on anything?

What's the point of even acknowledging him?

Now, sure, you might be able to apply a lot of that to me as well, but go right ahead. If you guys don't ever feel the need to respond to my opinions ever again . . . I'm not going to cry over it.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Some Republicans seem to have awfully short memories. Although, you guys can't seem to manage to forget the blow job by the fat chick.



And evidently Dem memories are nonexistent, since they can NEVER remember that it was about PERJURY, not a blowjob.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Some Republicans seem to have awfully short memories. Although, you guys can't seem to manage to forget the blow job by the fat chick.



And evidently Dem memories are nonexistent, since they can NEVER remember that it was about PERJURY, not a blowjob.



RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHt...

I tend to think those of you who never get them get so vociferously obsessive on Wild Bill because it was proven he did get them...:ph34r::ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Some Republicans seem to have awfully short memories. Although, you guys can't seem to manage to forget the blow job by the fat chick.


And evidently Dem memories are nonexistent, since they can NEVER remember that it was about PERJURY, not a blowjob.



Disagree. It was a witch hunt to attempt to find -anything- that ended up with him perjuring himself, but it certainly wasn't about that at all from the start.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Nah, Barney Frank isn't a Republican.



Was Larry Craig?

Quote


Neither is Bill Clinton, sorry.



What about Gov. Sanford?

Quote


Because, for all the liberal's fantasies that they FINALLY have the right person in charge for it, the majority of Americans aren't quite ready for socialism yet.



Even if we admit the way you're presenting it (that there are only two choices - which of course is not true), supporting Republican party looks to be the worse one. After all, it seems to be moron magnet - and a lot of morons are in very high positions there. I do not support either party, but supporting Republican party in its current shape, with all those idiots looks like a pretty stupid thing to me.
* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Are you just dense, or are you not reading what I write?



I am reading what you write, and from what you write it is clear you don't know the issue and your example proves that.

Quote

Could you be more precise with you pronouns, please? I am not trying to run the country, the Republican Party is, and they need to learn a little flexibility.



Again you state people should give up principles when it is politically beneficial.

Some principles you must have if you throw them out when it will get you power or money.

Quote

Allow me to reiterate, I am not trying to win any elections. You need some work on your reading comprehension, and writing clarity.



You advocate it... That makes you a person with principles for sale to the highest bidder.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Or did you guys need to see a "transcript" of that?



We are still waiting for you to provide a transcript of your last claim.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



It's not common that I agree with the Professor but I must do so in this case. I hope this shows that I am fair and balanced. ;)

More serious here.... This is a big issue and I disagree with the GOP on this. I am Repulican and it I feel it goes against our values and it doesn't align itself with our Representative Republic system. You must vote on issues according to how the people in your district want you to. If you don't, then you are not representing the people properly. It blocks "Free Will" for Congressmen and in my opinion disregards Article IV Section 4 of the US Constitution. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html If you are forcing someone to vote either direction then that becomes dictatorship. To be fair, I see Pelosi try this crap with the blue dog democrats too over the health care issue.

Does anyone else find it funny that we made a SPORT out of an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't see what all the hubbub is about. It's not like they are going to kick out everyone that doesn't pledge allegiance to their flag; they are just not going to give money to candidates that don't. I would think any worthwhile Republican candidate wouldn't want money from the GOP, anyway, because that reeks of socialism.
Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My gripe with this is that it seems more like an anti-obama doctrine than a pro-individual rights doctrine.

Quote

WHEREAS, Republican faithfulness to its conservative principles and public policies is necessary to restore the trust of the American people in the Republican Party and to lead to Republican electoral victories; and



I think that about sums up the purpose of the thing right there. "We'll accept anyone that will help us beat the democrats."

It's no wonder that 73% of R. voters say that the party leadership has lost touch with their base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't see what all the hubbub is about.



Yes, I agree.

I have no objection to what Republicans do with one another, so long as it involves consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes and/or toilet stall.

:|
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

and/or toilet stall.



Unfortunately, those were public toilet stalls ;) And I was surprised at the number of them that got caught doing the same thing. But now I'm pretty sure about at least one subject they discuss at their secret meetings :D
Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I have no objection to what Republicans do with one another, so long as it involves consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes and/or toilet stall.



I do object, however, if they at the same time condemn such behavior in public, or even sponsor laws against it. Says a lot about integrity of one's character.
* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I have no objection to what Republicans do with one another, so long as it involves consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes and/or toilet stall.



I do object, however, if they at the same time condemn such behavior in public, or even sponsor laws against it. Says a lot about integrity of one's character.



+1
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


I have no objection to what Republicans do with one another, so long as it involves consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes and/or toilet stall.



I do object, however, if they at the same time condemn such behavior in public, or even sponsor laws against it. Says a lot about integrity of one's character.



+1



R's don't have the market cornered in deviant behaviour.
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


I have no objection to what Republicans do with one another, so long as it involves consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes and/or toilet stall.



I do object, however, if they at the same time condemn such behavior in public, or even sponsor laws against it. Says a lot about integrity of one's character.



+1



R's don't have the market cornered in deviant behaviour.



But they do seem to have cornerd the market on being FOR family values... all the while trashing those values behind closed toilet stall doors, or congressional offices, or church pulpits etc etc etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


I have no objection to what Republicans do with one another, so long as it involves consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes and/or toilet stall.



I do object, however, if they at the same time condemn such behavior in public, or even sponsor laws against it. Says a lot about integrity of one's character.



+1



R's don't have the market cornered in deviant behaviour.



You weren't paying attention, were you?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0