Amazon 7 #26 November 28, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote It looks like your mostly right, but that neoconservative is another word/term like fascism and has some ambiguity depending upon who you listen to. IOW, you're going to continue to use it to describe anyone that disagrees with you. Just like "liberal" in the early 90s. Seems like a continuation of other threads started by him. More accurate thread title would be "Conservative Bashing, Part MMDXIV" Fixed that for you. At least it's not Conservatives and the daily circle jerk about Obama this or Obama that. That is just sad to see that much needledick strokin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #27 November 28, 2009 QuoteCan you argue any of the entries I posted? Sure. I could argue using facts to show you where you are wrong. I could also try to drag a dead mule. I would have more success with the latter.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #28 November 28, 2009 "Fixed that for you." Thanks. I lost count so i just threw an arbitrary number in there.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #29 November 28, 2009 QuoteAt least it's not Conservatives and the daily circle jerk about Obama this or Obama that. That is just sad to see that much needledick strokin. I bow to the experience of the expert - eight nine years and counting for your side.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #30 November 28, 2009 QuoteQuoteCan you argue any of the entries I posted? Sure. I could argue using facts to show you where you are wrong. I could also try to drag a dead mule. I would have more success with the latter. Or you could just go and find some assertions I refuted and try to refute mine. Hey, I thought the rhetoric mess was over between us, are you gonna go back to trashing this place or can we keep it substantive? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #31 November 28, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteCan you argue any of the entries I posted? Sure. I could argue using facts to show you where you are wrong. I could also try to drag a dead mule. I would have more success with the latter. Or you could just go and find some assertions I refuted and try to refute mine. Hey, I thought the rhetoric mess was over between us, are you gonna go back to trashing this place or can we keep it substantive? Refer back to post #27.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DavidB 0 #32 November 28, 2009 Quote Quote Quote Quote Can you argue any of the entries I posted? Sure. I could argue using facts to show you where you are wrong. I could also try to drag a dead mule. I would have more success with the latter. Or you could just go and find some assertions I refuted and try to refute mine. Hey, I thought the rhetoric mess was over between us, are you gonna go back to trashing this place or can we keep it substantive? Refer back to post #27. I'm not sure what's funnier, these continuing rants, or the fact that lucky keeps saying "Republicans are evil, Democrats are good", or the fact that he actually believes that? When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #33 November 28, 2009 QuoteLucky clearly does not understand the difference between Neo-conservatism and Paleo- (or traditional) conservatism. The Cato institute clearly leans more towards the Paleo-conservative. He can't tell the Onion from serious Jounalism. Do you really expect him to differentiate between hard core interventionist neo-con policies and the Libertarian viewpoint?witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #34 November 29, 2009 QuoteDo you really expect him to differentiate between hard core interventionist neo-con policies and the Libertarian viewpoint? Yea, and you can't tell the ddifference; nutty Libertarians hop back and forth between the Libertarian Party and Republican Party. Did you vote for Ron Paul the dieharrd Liber? Oh wait, I forgot, he ran as a Repiblican and is a Republican in congress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul Political party Republican (1976-1988) Libertarian (1988 Presidential Election) Republican (1988-Present) Yea, nice argument, can you tell or are they interchangeable? And of course you'll run it, but you can't make us believe that your opinions of gays aren't exactly what is portrayed by the Onion. No conservatives have so far. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #35 November 29, 2009 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Can you argue any of the entries I posted? Sure. I could argue using facts to show you where you are wrong. I could also try to drag a dead mule. I would have more success with the latter. Or you could just go and find some assertions I refuted and try to refute mine. Hey, I thought the rhetoric mess was over between us, are you gonna go back to trashing this place or can we keep it substantive? Refer back to post #27. I'm not sure what's funnier, these continuing rants, or the fact that lucky keeps saying "Republicans are evil, Democrats are good", or the fact that he actually believes that? Right now that's true. Your denials that the RW didn't get us here are yet to be refuted by you or anyone. But the R's haven't always been the turds, they were once the heroes. Been a while tho. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
d16842 0 #36 November 29, 2009 QuoteQuoteYou mean like The Onion? No, more like Cato and the Heritage Foundation so many of the neo's like to cite. So apparently you agree then, these RW rags are often BS. So what's your point? I am a conservative, and registered Republican and fully admit some of the stuff is trash. But surely you don't think the sources the far left uses are any better? Like the ones that document that Bush took down the twin towers on 9/11, Michael Moore's serious documentaries, or MoveOn's immense library of nothing but vetted facts. Or my personal favorite, Pelosi's versions (plural) of how she was deceived, and never told what was going on.Tom B Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #37 November 29, 2009 Quote Like the ones that document that Bush took down the twin towers on 9/11 If you don't understand what people are saying, you make yourself an ass by stating you do. 'Nobody' thinks GWB himself felled the towers, he was simply a part of the plan, and far to stupid to pull off such a scam. These people (thuthers) are not just pointing the finger, they are providing evidence, intellectual and complete scientific peer reviewed journals and are gaining some serious ground (especially in the last couple of weeks if you have been watching, which I doubt), the auhorities have come to a point where they have to address the issue, and fucktard republican followers will be eating their ten gallon hats when the truth comes out in the short future. Republican followers are unmistakably selfish and repugnant people with the desire to support the welfare of no other than themselves. The republican party and its follwers (voters) are responsable for the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent people, they show no remorse for such behavior and deserve nothing less than a slow painful death. IMHO Rant over. Bring on your PA's, I couldn't give a shit, the right wing neo con followers are the Bane of society."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #38 November 29, 2009 QuoteSo what's your point? I am a conservative, and registered Republican and fully admit some of the stuff is trash. I'm a registered R but don't consider most of myh values that way. QuoteBut surely you don't think the sources the far left uses are any better? I actually don't think they stoop to blatant dishonesty. Post a citation, I could be wrong. I'm sure there are a couple out there, but with RW rags, it's constant. I actually don't subscribe to or visit Moveon and the ilk. QuoteLike the ones that document that Bush took down the twin towers on 9/11, ... Which ones do that? Quote...Michael Moore's serious documentaries,... Are they factually incorrect or are they just opinionated? That was my point, so many RW rags will actually distort history, esp in obvious ways. Quote...or MoveOn's immense library of nothing but vetted facts. Examples. QuoteOr my personal favorite, Pelosi's versions (plural) of how she was deceived, and never told what was going on. Not sure what your referring to. I'm talking about taking historical facts and blatantly lying, not saying Reagan saved the economy and that altho the debt tripled under him, it was Carter's fault. That's just opinion-spin, a blatant lie would be to say that the Dems ran all of congress under Reagan all 8 years, that's the stuff I'm talking about. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #39 November 29, 2009 Quote Quote Like the ones that document that Bush took down the twin towers on 9/11 If you don't understand what people are saying, you make yourself an ass by stating you do. 'Nobody' thinks GWB himself felled the towers, he was simply a part of the plan, and far to stupid to pull off such a scam. These people (thuthers) are not just pointing the finger, they are providing evidence, intellectual and complete scientific peer reviewed journals and are gaining some serious ground (especially in the last couple of weeks if you have been watching, which I doubt), the auhorities have come to a point where they have to address the issue, and fucktard republican followers will be eating their ten gallon hats when the truth comes out in the short future. Republican followers are unmistakably selfish and repugnant people with the desire to support the welfare of no other than themselves. The republican party and its follwers (voters) are responsable for the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent people, they show no remorse for such behavior and deserve nothing less than a slow painful death. IMHO Rant over. Bring on your PA's, I couldn't give a shit, the right wing neo con followers are the Bane of society. Get off my wave length . No, I think it's possible Cheney had a hand and that Bush was just selectively apathetic, but so was he with Katrina. I dunno, conspiracies must be substantially proven by the conspirators. It wouldn't take a notarized affidavit from god for me to believe the RW had a hand, but I would need more evidence. With the ytter lack of compassion they show to others I see the framework there, but the evidecnce hasn't been produced yet. I appreciate people who try to bring it togther tho. As with McVeigh, he was a conservative nut, so I don't think it takes much to go from conservative to some of these acts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FallingOsh 0 #40 November 29, 2009 Quote Quote Like the ones that document that Bush took down the twin towers on 9/11 If you don't understand what people are saying, you make yourself an ass by stating you do. 'Nobody' thinks GWB himself felled the towers, he was simply a part of the plan, and far to stupid to pull off such a scam. These people (thuthers) are not just pointing the finger, they are providing evidence, intellectual and complete scientific peer reviewed journals and are gaining some serious ground (especially in the last couple of weeks if you have been watching, which I doubt), the auhorities have come to a point where they have to address the issue, and fucktard republican followers will be eating their ten gallon hats when the truth comes out in the short future. Republican followers are unmistakably selfish and repugnant people with the desire to support the welfare of no other than themselves. The republican party and its follwers (voters) are responsable for the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent people, they show no remorse for such behavior and deserve nothing less than a slow painful death. IMHO Rant over. Bring on your PA's, I couldn't give a shit, the right wing neo con followers are the Bane of society. Are you allergic to reality? -------------------------------------------------- Stay positive and love your life. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,073 #41 November 29, 2009 >you make yourself an ass by stating you do. Your last warning. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #42 November 29, 2009 Please don't ban rhys. I love his post. They are very funny and entertaining. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #43 November 29, 2009 Quote I'm a registered R but don't consider most of myh values that way. That's a funny comment to start the day with. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #44 November 29, 2009 Quote Quote I'm a registered R but don't consider most of myh values that way. That's a funny comment to start the day with. Are you just starting the day at noon? You really shouldn't sleep-in so late. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #45 November 29, 2009 Quote Are you just starting the day at noon? You really shouldn't sleep-in so late. Why the hell not? It's a holiday weekend and I can do whatever I want. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #46 November 29, 2009 Quote Quote Are you just starting the day at noon? You really shouldn't sleep-in so late. Why the hell not? It's a holiday weekend and I can do whatever I want. Haven't you seen Section 42 Part B subsection 15 of the HC bill? Sleep Requirements for the Public Option.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #47 November 29, 2009 Quote Quote Are you just starting the day at noon? You really shouldn't sleep-in so late. Why the hell not? It's a holiday weekend and I can do whatever I want. I just wanted to make sure you're not one of those lazy free-loading types conservatives always whine about. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #48 November 29, 2009 Quote I just wanted to make sure you're not one of those lazy free-loading types conservatives always whine about. Let's get back to your bullshit claim about being a registered Republican. Either you're lying, or you're so incredibly lazy you can't be bothered to resubmit a change in affiliation. Meanwhile you claim to know the affiliations of everyone else here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #49 November 29, 2009 QuoteQuote I just wanted to make sure you're not one of those lazy free-loading types conservatives always whine about. Let's get back to your bullshit claim about being a registered Republican. Either you're lying, or you're so incredibly lazy you can't be bothered to resubmit a change in affiliation. Meanwhile you claim to know the affiliations of everyone else here. I used to be of much lower education, so I bought all the BS. In 94 I registered as an R and voted that way until 96. I don't vote primaries, so I don;t need to change it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
d16842 0 #50 November 30, 2009 QuoteQuote Like the ones that document that Bush took down the twin towers on 9/11 If you don't understand what people are saying, you make yourself an ass by stating you do. Are you an engineer? I am. I looked at the "proof" right up until it got so stupid that I stopped. I understand WHAT they are saying. I just think they are wrong, and complete idiots for thinking with so many digging that the cover up would have held for eight years with none of the participants ratting. Or did Bush personally kill them and have them dumped at sea, with all record of their existence removed from earth. THAT is what this drivel sounds like, including yours. Quote 'Nobody' thinks GWB himself felled the towers, he was simply a part of the plan, and far to stupid to pull off such a scam. But he was smart enough, as the left claimed, to manipulate the world's oil prices, in fact lead a global conspiracy on lots of things. And to participate in a cover-up on this, which is 10X harder. Do you have any idea how many people would have had to have been in the loop to do what is suggested? Bush could not take a piss without somebody letting the NYT know within ten minutes. And you suggest that we have had eight years of total silence by the participants on this? Bullshit. Quote These people (thuthers) are not just pointing the finger, they are providing evidence, intellectual and complete scientific peer reviewed journals and are gaining some serious ground (especially in the last couple of weeks if you have been watching, which I doubt), Peer review... you mean like the peer review with the global warming thing last week? Peer review itself is the subject of a lot of "review" right now. Because as has been detailed in science journals that I continue to read, in my wife's medical journals, etc. recently, the peer review process clearly has real problems. I leave you to your rant. I am sure your buddies love it. But it is pretty meaningless, in fact you sound a lot like Glen Beck's mirror image. Perhaps you should go into radio. I think he is a nut, and you are too. Quote the auhorities have come to a point where they have to address the issue, and fucktard republican followers will be eating their ten gallon hats when the truth comes out in the short future. Republican followers are unmistakably selfish and repugnant people with the desire to support the welfare of no other than themselves. The republican party and its follwers (voters) are responsable for the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent people, they show no remorse for such behavior and deserve nothing less than a slow painful death. IMHO Rant over. Bring on your PA's, I couldn't give a shit, the right wing neo con followers are the Bane of society.Tom B Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
