DJL 235 #26 December 15, 2009 Quote Umm, no. You confuse "law abiding" with "not having been convicted". Not the same thing AT ALL. I wasn't ticketed for speeding today. Doesn't mean I obeyed the speed limit. Then people should not be allowed to drive cars."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #27 December 15, 2009 QuoteQuoteUmm, no. You confuse "law abiding" with "not having been convicted". Not the same thing AT ALL. Please read this section again: I know you like to think certain people are guilty till you say otherwise, but the legal system says otherwise and the background check confirms that. Nope, I didn't use the word "guilty", you did. Law abiding is a statement of fact. Guilty is a statement of finding by the judicial system. Different things, as you recognized YOURSELF in this post about OJ Simpson: and this one. You were quite happy to conclude that OJ was a murderer despite no guilty verdict having been recorded. Just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean you are law abiding.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #28 December 15, 2009 Quote Then people should not be allowed to drive cars. 90% of them for sure. First get rid of those that drive slowly in the left lane.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #29 December 15, 2009 QuoteQuoteUmm, no. You confuse "law abiding" with "not having been convicted". Not the same thing AT ALL. Please read this section again: I know you like to think certain people are guilty till you say otherwise, but the legal system says otherwise and the background check confirms that. If someone has been arrested and subsequently acquitted for a capital felony, e.g., first degree murder, can they get a CCW permit in your state? What about most other states?Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #30 December 15, 2009 Quote If someone has been arrested and subsequently acquitted for a capital felony, e.g., first degree murder, can they get a CCW permit in your state? What about most other states? why shouldn't they? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #31 December 15, 2009 Quotewhy shouldn't they? I've heard (but haven't verified) that a felony arrest, even without a conviction, can preclude one from obtaining a CCW.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #32 December 15, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteUmm, no. You confuse "law abiding" with "not having been convicted". Not the same thing AT ALL. Please read this section again: I know you like to think certain people are guilty till you say otherwise, but the legal system says otherwise and the background check confirms that. If someone has been arrested and subsequently acquitted for a capital felony, e.g., first degree murder, can they get a CCW permit in your state? What about most other states? IIRC, they have to request that from ATF - you can imagine how many exemptions they've passed.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #33 December 16, 2009 QuoteIf someone has been arrested and subsequently acquitted for a capital felony, e.g., first degree murder, can they get a CCW permit in your state? What about most other states? Yes. You can even have been found guilty and get your rights restored. http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/firearms/felony_conviction.html QuoteI've heard (but haven't verified) that a felony arrest, even without a conviction, can preclude one from obtaining a CCW. A felony arrest can suspend your right till the issue has been resolved. But once found not guilty you can get a CWP... It will involve some more paperwork. An adjudication of guilt withheld, or a suspended sentence on any felony does automatically stop you. After three years (currently there is a bill in the FL house that is being proposed to make it 5 years) you can normally get a CWP in FL."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #34 December 16, 2009 QuoteJust because you haven't been caught doesn't mean you are law abiding. But it does mean you can't be assumed guilty... No matter what Kallend says. Fact is she was "law abiding" as far as anyone knows and will remain "law abiding" till proven guilty by a jury. In your world you may want to do otherwise, but here in the US things work differently."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #35 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuote Then people should not be allowed to drive cars. 90% of them for sure. First get rid of those that drive slowly in the left lane. If everyone were armed then I think we'd find fewer people willing to cut people off in traffic. The problem here is that police are always there AFTER the incident but a gun can be there DURING the incident."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #36 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteJust because you haven't been caught doesn't mean you are law abiding. But it does mean you can't be assumed guilty... No matter what Kallend says. . Straw man. Try responding to what I actually wrote. And try to recall what YOU wrote about OJ (links HERE) That's called hypocrisy, Ron.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #37 December 16, 2009 QuoteStraw man. You would know...since it seems to be your favorite tactic. QuoteThat's called hypocrisy, Ron. No, that is called an opinion. Also, you do remember he was found guilty in the civil trial right?"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #38 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteStraw man. You would know...since it seems to be your favorite tactic. QuoteThat's called hypocrisy, Ron. No, that is called an opinion. Also, you do remember he was found guilty in the civil trial right? Wrong. Civil trials don't determine guilt. Where did you learn civics? Unfortunately for you, our posts in this thread are still available for all to read. As anyone can see, I wrote nothing of judicially determined guilt or innocence, despite your straw man attempt to claim that I did.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #39 December 16, 2009 QuoteIf everyone were armed then I think we'd find fewer people willing to cut people off in traffic. I've always wanted a .50 cal machine gun visibly mounted on the hood of my car. Let's see how many pickup trucks fuck with me then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
virgin-burner 1 #40 December 16, 2009 Quote Quote If everyone were armed then I think we'd find fewer people willing to cut people off in traffic. I've always wanted a .50 cal machine gun visibly mounted on the hood of my car. Let's see how many pickup trucks fuck with me then. i'd prefer the stealth-type missiles james bond style - and the aston martin to go with it! “Some may never live, but the crazy never die.” -Hunter S. Thompson "No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try." -Yoda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #41 December 16, 2009 QuoteUnfortunately for you, our posts in this thread are still available for all to read. As are yours. Your posting history is quite clear.... you make opinions, imply information... and when proven to be full of crap you start throwing strawmen. Again, your history is there for all to see."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #42 December 16, 2009 Quote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Here's one opinion from a gun enthusiast. Another More You'll find the NRA's position if you scroll through this one.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #43 December 16, 2009 Quote Quote Quote Yep.... That confirms she is a law abiding citizen. I know you like to think certain people are guilty till you say otherwise, but the legal system says otherwise and the background check confirms that. Umm, no. You confuse "law abiding" with "not having been convicted". Not the same thing AT ALL. I wasn't ticketed for speeding today. Doesn't mean I obeyed the speed limit. A founding principle of our nation is that you're presumed innocent until proven guilty, by a jury of your peers. Changed your tune since you wrote: www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2687069;search_string=straw%20purchase;#2687069 and www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2684121;search_string=straw%20purchase;#2684121 ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #44 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #45 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #46 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #47 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #48 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
kallend 2,106 #43 December 16, 2009 Quote Quote Quote Yep.... That confirms she is a law abiding citizen. I know you like to think certain people are guilty till you say otherwise, but the legal system says otherwise and the background check confirms that. Umm, no. You confuse "law abiding" with "not having been convicted". Not the same thing AT ALL. I wasn't ticketed for speeding today. Doesn't mean I obeyed the speed limit. A founding principle of our nation is that you're presumed innocent until proven guilty, by a jury of your peers. Changed your tune since you wrote: www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2687069;search_string=straw%20purchase;#2687069 and www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2684121;search_string=straw%20purchase;#2684121 ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #44 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #45 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #46 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #47 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #48 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
kallend 2,106 #45 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #46 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #47 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #48 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
mnealtx 0 #46 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #47 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #48 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kallend 2,106 #47 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #48 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
mnealtx 0 #48 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kallend 2,106 #49 December 16, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Tell us, Ron and kelp: Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? You mean like Boxer? Or was it Feinstein? Either or both, you choose. Is a straw purchaser a "law abiding citizen"? When you perfect your future crime machine, let the rest of us know - until then, this is as useless a point as your whining about the DC crime stats. Why avoid the question? It's pretty simple. Even YOU have pontificated on straw purchases in the past. Because it's your usual lame argument - unless, of course, you have proof that the women who originally bought it did so as a straw purchase. It's not an argument, it's a question. Please try to keep up. Would you classify someone who can pass the background check and who makes a straw purchase of a gun as "law abiding"? Previous posts by warpedskydiver and kelpdiver among others have indicated that they are NOT law abiding. Ron thinks they are. Are you afraid of answering for some reason?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 2 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
mnealtx 0 #50 December 16, 2009 QuoteAre you afraid of answering for some reason? Your question has been answered before, several times, by all of us. Why are you asking it THIS time? Either you have proof that the woman made a straw purchase, or you're pulling your usual misdirect bullshit - which is it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
