rushmc 23 #1 March 15, 2010 I think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2 March 15, 2010 I started this as a sarcastic thread Then I got to thinking more about it I look forward to the comments"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riddler 0 #3 March 15, 2010 That's right! We liberals love criminals! In fact, most of us are criminals (only the bad liberals are not criminals). And we sure as heck don't want the government having copies of our DNA, because we all get arrested at least once a week (I got arrested three times this week). I'm pretty sure all of this was started by the Bush administration, as a way to clone people, but you're just blaming Obama for what Bush started. Geez, sooner or later, I thought you would run out of labels - you must have a label-making machine in your basement or something.Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #4 March 15, 2010 QuoteThat's right! We liberals love criminals! In fact, most of us are criminals (only the bad liberals are not criminals). And we sure as heck don't want the government having copies of our DNA, because we all get arrested at least once a week (I got arrested three times this week). I'm pretty sure all of this was started by the Bush administration, as a way to clone people, but you're just blaming Obama for what Bush started. Geez, sooner or later, I thought you would run out of labels - you must have a label-making machine in your basement or something. DUUUUDE he is in Iowa... winter is long looking at empty corn fields... summer watching corn grow is long..... I guess they have to do SOMETHING Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #5 March 15, 2010 Can't address the issue? I posted a follow up Did you read it? Libs scream to and about the privacy issue Now a Dem is proposing an action related to privacy (or removing more privacy. what was your position related to the Patriot Act) Are you OK with this action? Lower your blood pressure and THINK"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redlegphi 0 #6 March 15, 2010 QuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 March 15, 2010 QuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested? WTF???"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #8 March 15, 2010 Quote Quote That's right! We liberals love criminals! In fact, most of us are criminals (only the bad liberals are not criminals). And we sure as heck don't want the government having copies of our DNA, because we all get arrested at least once a week (I got arrested three times this week). I'm pretty sure all of this was started by the Bush administration, as a way to clone people, but you're just blaming Obama for what Bush started. Geez, sooner or later, I thought you would run out of labels - you must have a label-making machine in your basement or something. DUUUUDE he is in Iowa... winter is long looking at empty corn fields... summer watching corn grow is long..... I guess they have to do SOMETHING I will take snow and corn fields over you near constant rain and cloud any day We all have our evils to live with "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
captain1976 0 #9 March 15, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested WTF??? This falls right in line with the FBI child fingerprint program. Totally bogus, it was designed right from the start to get as many fingerprints on record as possible. It was done so under the disguise of protecting children. The retired FBI agent who told me about this fraudulent program said that the odds of it even helping a single child was remote.You live more in the few minutes of skydiving than many people live in their lifetime Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #10 March 15, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested WTF??? This falls right in line with the FBI child fingerprint program. Totally bogus, it was designed right from the start to get as many fingerprints on record as possible. It was done so under the disguise of protecting children. The retired FBI agent who told me about this fraudulent program said that the odds of it even helping a single child was remote. Never heard that Not too hard to believe however but I will withhold judgment and comment"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redlegphi 0 #11 March 15, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested? WTF??? I also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #12 March 15, 2010 QuoteHey Libs Brilliant! Once again, you leave us in awe. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #13 March 15, 2010 QuoteQuoteHey Libs Brilliant! Once again, you leave us in awe. Were you planning on rebutting the post, or just getting the jab in?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #14 March 15, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested? WTF??? I also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Agree. Same should apply to fingerprints.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #15 March 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested? WTF??? I also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Agree. Same should apply to fingerprints. And so should a NICS check if it results in a legal gun sale"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #16 March 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think it sucks *** Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest Maybe no different that finger prints in the end and in today's world? Could be an interesting topic I'm going to (gasp!) agree with you on this. I have no issue with the cops getting DNA with a warrant. I have no issue with them getting it from convicted criminals. I don't see how they have the right to take it from somebody for being arrested. Agreed I have my prints on record for two issues Once Arrested for public intox as a passenger in a car where the operator was arrested for a DUI. Subsequently thrown out by the Iowa SC (not my case specifically) and I only paid court costs and spent a night in jail and my record is supposed to have been cleared (never checked) Second set taken for a back ground check to have an on track license for the Prairie Meadows racing track in Des Monies. Got no problem if there have been a conviction or a warrant has been issued. But for just being arrested? WTF??? I also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Agree. Same should apply to fingerprints. And so should a NICS check if it results in a legal gun sale No. Doesn't apply to personal physiological/anatomical data, and is undertaken voluntarily. The DNA we're discussing is taken under coercion.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #17 March 17, 2010 Your reply was to the following QuoteI also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Did you forget?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites brenthutch 444 #18 March 17, 2010 Duuude, (sounds of bong water bubbling) Yep that hayseed backwatter of inbred rednecks that voted for Obama and gay marriage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,026 #19 March 17, 2010 QuoteYour reply was to the following QuoteI also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Did you forget? No. Did you comprehend? - No.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites hwt 0 #20 March 17, 2010 think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #21 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. In theory it would not seem like a bad idea (just the card and phot) but our gov has already shown a proensity to abuse this kind of info/data. Then there are those who think this is bad but keep gun sale background checks is ok I dont like it but we do need a way to keep the dead from voting"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #22 March 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteYour reply was to the following QuoteI also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Did you forget? No. Did you comprehend? - No. I did but I do not agree with you that there is a differnce Inagine that Are you beeing a smart ass yet again? yes"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #23 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. SO opt out of buying anything and go live in a right wing militia compound already. Guess what if you are alive in this country you have been in all kinds of database's since the day you were born. YOU ALREADY HAVE THE MARK OF THE BEAST UPON YOUR FOREHEAD, LORD SATAN OWNS YOU ALL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KTWilliams 0 #24 March 19, 2010 Hmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #25 March 19, 2010 QuoteHmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle I would like to agree with you but, when states issue drivers licenses to illegals you gotta wonder if that is enough Dont get me wrong, I am really not in favor of a us ID card On the other hand, I am seeing different places that now almost require a US passport to prove your identity."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
brenthutch 444 #18 March 17, 2010 Duuude, (sounds of bong water bubbling) Yep that hayseed backwatter of inbred rednecks that voted for Obama and gay marriage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #19 March 17, 2010 QuoteYour reply was to the following QuoteI also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Did you forget? No. Did you comprehend? - No.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites hwt 0 #20 March 17, 2010 think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #21 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. In theory it would not seem like a bad idea (just the card and phot) but our gov has already shown a proensity to abuse this kind of info/data. Then there are those who think this is bad but keep gun sale background checks is ok I dont like it but we do need a way to keep the dead from voting"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #22 March 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteYour reply was to the following QuoteI also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Did you forget? No. Did you comprehend? - No. I did but I do not agree with you that there is a differnce Inagine that Are you beeing a smart ass yet again? yes"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #23 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. SO opt out of buying anything and go live in a right wing militia compound already. Guess what if you are alive in this country you have been in all kinds of database's since the day you were born. YOU ALREADY HAVE THE MARK OF THE BEAST UPON YOUR FOREHEAD, LORD SATAN OWNS YOU ALL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KTWilliams 0 #24 March 19, 2010 Hmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #25 March 19, 2010 QuoteHmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle I would like to agree with you but, when states issue drivers licenses to illegals you gotta wonder if that is enough Dont get me wrong, I am really not in favor of a us ID card On the other hand, I am seeing different places that now almost require a US passport to prove your identity."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
hwt 0 #20 March 17, 2010 think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #21 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. In theory it would not seem like a bad idea (just the card and phot) but our gov has already shown a proensity to abuse this kind of info/data. Then there are those who think this is bad but keep gun sale background checks is ok I dont like it but we do need a way to keep the dead from voting"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #22 March 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteYour reply was to the following QuoteI also think that, if a warrant is used to get a person's DNA, if that DNA doesn't lead to a conviction then the DNA should be destroyed. Quote Did you forget? No. Did you comprehend? - No. I did but I do not agree with you that there is a differnce Inagine that Are you beeing a smart ass yet again? yes"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #23 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. SO opt out of buying anything and go live in a right wing militia compound already. Guess what if you are alive in this country you have been in all kinds of database's since the day you were born. YOU ALREADY HAVE THE MARK OF THE BEAST UPON YOUR FOREHEAD, LORD SATAN OWNS YOU ALL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites KTWilliams 0 #24 March 19, 2010 Hmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #25 March 19, 2010 QuoteHmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle I would like to agree with you but, when states issue drivers licenses to illegals you gotta wonder if that is enough Dont get me wrong, I am really not in favor of a us ID card On the other hand, I am seeing different places that now almost require a US passport to prove your identity."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Amazon 7 #23 March 17, 2010 Quote think this is bad , they are proposing a national i.d. card. Sounds a little like big brother governing 100% of our life. While I am not certain what data would be help on this smart card I have been hearing anything from a digital photograph to DNA. I am not sure what your thoughts here are but this sounds disturbing to me for many reasons. If the ID is to be encoded with the card holder’s DNA then each and every one of us are now cataloged into a federal, state, or local database somewhere. SO opt out of buying anything and go live in a right wing militia compound already. Guess what if you are alive in this country you have been in all kinds of database's since the day you were born. YOU ALREADY HAVE THE MARK OF THE BEAST UPON YOUR FOREHEAD, LORD SATAN OWNS YOU ALL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTWilliams 0 #24 March 19, 2010 Hmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #25 March 19, 2010 QuoteHmmm, a card and a photograph. Does anyone on here not have a drivers license, state I.D., or passport? Seems like your covered. ~Kyle I would like to agree with you but, when states issue drivers licenses to illegals you gotta wonder if that is enough Dont get me wrong, I am really not in favor of a us ID card On the other hand, I am seeing different places that now almost require a US passport to prove your identity."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
