rushmc 23
Doctor to Patients Who Voted for Obama: Get Your Treatment Elsewhere
By
Andy9o8, in Speakers Corner
Recommended Posts
kallend 2,026
QuoteQuoteThis whole thread is a mere microcosm of the bigger problem we face here in Amerika. You're not allowed to think, say, or feel those things anymore. You're not allowed to run your business the way you see fit. We're so full of "not allowed" anymore...it's fucking bullshit.
You think you live in a free country...that ship sailed ages ago.
As I pointed out in another thread. Political correctness is a form of STFU and is one of the biggest dangers we have to our constitution. No different than Obama speaking of Limbaugh and Beck
So when is Limbaugh going to leave the country as promised?
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Lucky... 0
QuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Gee, I'm self-reliant and I'm the furthest from a Republican; there goes your theory. I can point out several other people who are Dems and very self-reliant as well I can point to R's who are welfare whores too, so that deduction is ridiculous.
As for fighting fights, I went up against 2 law firms in a 5-year court battle, I was pro per, I'm a fighter, moreso than you I'm sure, so am I a pussy for using a state courtroom and state enforcement to collect? I guess if we hang our heads and walk walk away we're tough, if we fight we're pussies.
In your definition, apathy = tough, activism = pussy. To that I say
Actually then, tea baggers are pussies, according to you, they're fighting for their agenda rather than just laying down; pussies according to you.
kallend 2,026
QuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Did you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Gee, I'm self-reliant and I'm the furthest from a Republican; there goes your theory. I can point out several other people who are Dems and very self-reliant as well I can point to R's who are welfare whores too, so that deduction is ridiculous.
As for fighting fights, I went up against 2 law firms in a 5-year court battle, I was pro per, I'm a fighter, moreso than you I'm sure, so am I a pussy for using a state courtroom and state enforcement to collect? I guess if we hang our heads and walk walk away we're tough, if we fight we're pussies.
In your definition, apathy = tough, activism = pussy. To that I say
Actually then, tea baggers are pussies, according to you, they're fighting for their agenda rather than just laying down; pussies according to you.
You are getting twist lessons from kallend now
People like you want the gov to give them stuff that other earn
Pussy's
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Andy9o8 2
QuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Did you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
Does he avail himself of police protection? Fire department protection? Air traffic control? Military, uh, protection?
Lucky... 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteThis whole thread is a mere microcosm of the bigger problem we face here in Amerika. You're not allowed to think, say, or feel those things anymore. You're not allowed to run your business the way you see fit. We're so full of "not allowed" anymore...it's fucking bullshit.
You think you live in a free country...that ship sailed ages ago.
As I pointed out in another thread. Political correctness is a form of STFU and is one of the biggest dangers we have to our constitution. No different than Obama speaking of Limbaugh and Beck
So when is Limbaugh going to leave the country as promised?
When:
- The oxycontin runs out
- All Parkinson's patients quit "faking" it
- All top notch black athletes quit getting the "social concern" bump
- And when all taxes are finally repealled.
So...never.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Did you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
Does he avail himself of police protection? Fire department protection? Military, uh, protection?
Straw man but
The HC bill just signed provide for 108 B to the Auto worker union to bail out their retirement fund
See why they supported it
Pussy's
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Lucky... 0
QuoteQuoteThis whole thread is a mere microcosm of the bigger problem we face here in Amerika. You're not allowed to think, say, or feel those things anymore. You're not allowed to run your business the way you see fit. We're so full of "not allowed" anymore...it's fucking bullshit.
You think you live in a free country...that ship sailed ages ago.
As I pointed out in another thread. Political correctness is a form of STFU and is one of the biggest dangers we have to our constitution. No different than Obama speaking of Limbaugh and Beck
Right and in some circles calling Reagan a fascist pig PI. Hell, the Alexander Haig thread drew some criticism as PI. The, "Is Satan calling Cheney home" thread drew a ton of it, so WTF is your point? The diff is that I'm not a sworn HC provider with a FIDUCIARY DUTY to my patients. Since I posted this before and no one looked it up I will post. WHat it is the HIGHEST standard of care, a doctor owes it to his/her patients, a lawyer to his/her clients, etc.:
http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/breach-of-fiduciary-duty
A fiduciary duty is an obligation to act in the best interest of another party. For instance, a corporation's board member has a fiduciary duty to the shareholders, a trustee has a fiduciary duty to the trust's beneficiaries, and an attorney has a fiduciary duty to a client.
A fiduciary obligation exists whenever the relationship with the client involves a special trust, confidence, and reliance on ithe fiduciary to exercise his discretion or expertise in acting for the client. The fiduciary must knowingly accept that trust and confidence to exercise his expertise and discretion to act on the client's behalf.
When one person does agree to act for another in a fiduciary relationship, the law forbids the fiduciary from acting in any manner adverse or contrary to the interests of the client, or from acting for his own benefit in relation to the subject matter. The client is entitled to the best efforts of the fiduciary on his behalf and the fiduciary must exercise all of the skill, care and diligence at his disposal when acting on behalf of the client. A person acting in a fiduciary capacity is held to a high standard of honesty and full disclosure in regard to the client and must not obtain a personal benefit at the expense of the client.
So when Dr. Maggoted fuck is sued for malpractice, he will be hearing this term until his 2" dick falls off. His lawyer will be downplaying it, the plaintiffs will be constantly bringing it up and the courts will uphold and recognize it as judicial notice (another term for you to not look up).
And that doesn't yet recognize his duty to his employees/perspective employees. The stupid POS is opening a pandora's box that could keep him in court for years.
Just as a lawyer can't just drop a client w/o great cause, a doctor has a sort of duty to see a patient with ongoing issues unless there is cause; political difference is not recognized as cause. Of course the client can fire the doc or lawyer whenever he/she wants, but it's a 1-way street.
As for duties, fiduciary is the highest, standard duty of care is the lowest, it's the basic duty you owe everyone walking down the street. The acts Dr Dickhead exhibited could warrant punitives if the acts were severe enough, depending upon the subsequent acts and outcomes.
This is not Virginia City in 1853, at least in reality.
Lucky... 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Gee, I'm self-reliant and I'm the furthest from a Republican; there goes your theory. I can point out several other people who are Dems and very self-reliant as well I can point to R's who are welfare whores too, so that deduction is ridiculous.
As for fighting fights, I went up against 2 law firms in a 5-year court battle, I was pro per, I'm a fighter, moreso than you I'm sure, so am I a pussy for using a state courtroom and state enforcement to collect? I guess if we hang our heads and walk walk away we're tough, if we fight we're pussies.
In your definition, apathy = tough, activism = pussy. To that I sayActually then, tea baggers are pussies, according to you, they're fighting for their agenda rather than just laying down; pussies according to you.
You are getting twist lessons from kallend now
People like you want the gov to give them stuff that other earn
Pussy's
I receive nothing, my taxes give money to the Military Industrial Complex that I and others earn. You don't have an issue with that, but you do with HC, the bailouts, etc. So you don't have a problem with redistribution, something you label as pussy-like, you have a specific problem with redistribution to anything social.
kallend 2,026
Did you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Lucky... 0
QuoteDid you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
I think we can assume yes on the latter, we know the answer to the former as well.
rushmc 23
QuoteDid you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
Keep your strawman
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Gee, I'm self-reliant and I'm the furthest from a Republican; there goes your theory. I can point out several other people who are Dems and very self-reliant as well I can point to R's who are welfare whores too, so that deduction is ridiculous.
As for fighting fights, I went up against 2 law firms in a 5-year court battle, I was pro per, I'm a fighter, moreso than you I'm sure, so am I a pussy for using a state courtroom and state enforcement to collect? I guess if we hang our heads and walk walk away we're tough, if we fight we're pussies.
In your definition, apathy = tough, activism = pussy. To that I say
You are getting twist lessons from kallend now
People like you want the gov to give them stuff that other earn
Pussy's
I receive nothing, my taxes give money to the Military Industrial Complex that I and others earn. You don't have an issue with that, but you do with HC, the bailouts, etc. So you don't have a problem with redistribution, something you label as pussy-like, you have a specific problem with redistribution to anything social.
I am for the things that the Constitution outlines
You want the help the pussy's get even more
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Lucky... 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Gee, I'm self-reliant and I'm the furthest from a Republican; there goes your theory. I can point out several other people who are Dems and very self-reliant as well I can point to R's who are welfare whores too, so that deduction is ridiculous.
As for fighting fights, I went up against 2 law firms in a 5-year court battle, I was pro per, I'm a fighter, moreso than you I'm sure, so am I a pussy for using a state courtroom and state enforcement to collect? I guess if we hang our heads and walk walk away we're tough, if we fight we're pussies.
In your definition, apathy = tough, activism = pussy. To that I say
You are getting twist lessons from kallend now
People like you want the gov to give them stuff that other earn
Pussy's
I receive nothing, my taxes give money to the Military Industrial Complex that I and others earn. You don't have an issue with that, but you do with HC, the bailouts, etc. So you don't have a problem with redistribution, something you label as pussy-like, you have a specific problem with redistribution to anything social.
I am for the things that the Constitution outlines
You want the help the pussy's get even more
So then you are not for something if the US Const fails to outline it, right? Last I checked, the US Const didn't make reference to a standing Army, anything aviation, cars, etc. Hell, the US Const doesn't even mention the draft, yet they infer it does thru " but its authorization for the Congress to "raise and support Armies" allows for it. http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_drft.html At the signing of the US Const, many FF owned slaves, yet they still referred to freedoms for all men. Women were chattle in some ways, yet freedoms for all men; I guess the US Const shows it's ugly head there.
The word, "privacy" can't be found anywhere in the Preamble, Articles or Amendments, yet it is everywhere in case law, aka the living constitution. I could go on with multiple examples, but those who hang on to the very last thread of the original writing of the US Const as if that is all there is are people who tend not to understand it very well. The very people who run around pounding on the US Const tend to understand it as well as the same types who pound the bible, clammering all the craziness that they do.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteCan you now understand why peopel have strayed from the right????
Yep, because they want the gov to take care of them and fight their fights
Pussy's = no self reliance in this instance
Gee, I'm self-reliant and I'm the furthest from a Republican; there goes your theory. I can point out several other people who are Dems and very self-reliant as well I can point to R's who are welfare whores too, so that deduction is ridiculous.
As for fighting fights, I went up against 2 law firms in a 5-year court battle, I was pro per, I'm a fighter, moreso than you I'm sure, so am I a pussy for using a state courtroom and state enforcement to collect? I guess if we hang our heads and walk walk away we're tough, if we fight we're pussies.
In your definition, apathy = tough, activism = pussy. To that I say
You are getting twist lessons from kallend now
People like you want the gov to give them stuff that other earn
Pussy's
I receive nothing, my taxes give money to the Military Industrial Complex that I and others earn. You don't have an issue with that, but you do with HC, the bailouts, etc. So you don't have a problem with redistribution, something you label as pussy-like, you have a specific problem with redistribution to anything social.
I am for the things that the Constitution outlines
You want the help the pussy's get even more
So then you are not for something if the US Const fails to outline it, right? Last I checked, the US Const didn't make reference to a standing Army, anything aviation, cars, etc. Hell, the US Const doesn't even mention the draft, yet they infer it does thru " but its authorization for the Congress to "raise and support Armies" allows for it. http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_drft.html At the signing of the US Const, many FF owned slaves, yet they still referred to freedoms for all men. Women were chattle in some ways, yet freedoms for all men; I guess the US Const shows it's ugly head there.
The word, "privacy" can't be found anywhere in the Preamble, Articles or Amendments, yet it is everywhere in case law, aka the living constitution. I could go on with multiple examples, but those who hang on to the very last thread of the original writing of the US Const as if that is all there is are people who tend not to understand it very well. The very people who run around pounding on the US Const tend to understand it as well as the same types who pound the bible, clammering all the craziness that they do.
Again you twist
But then you support union thugs who will only support a HC bill that does not tax their high cost hc plans and then turns and uses tax payer money to bail out a poorly run retirement package that is terribly underfunded
Pussy's
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rhaig 0
Quote
Well as long as it works for you....
wow... so much time on your hands. and attacking the poster instead of the post... I seriously thought you were Lucky there when I hit reply.
--
Rob
Rob
QuoteLast I checked, the US Const didn't make reference to a standing Army,..........authorization for the Congress to "raise and support Armies" allows for it
You should at least wait a post or two before you contradict yourself-that without bringing up that "common defense" thing. And I do feel that the Federal govt has it's hands in a lot of pies it shouldn't-adding more doesn't correct that.
You are only as strong as the prey you devour
kallend 2,026
QuoteQuoteDid you attend public schools? Do you drive on public roads?
Keep your strawman
Misuse of word. Do you own a dictionary?
So having the taxpayers pay for things YOU want is OK, but not for things others want.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
As I pointed out in another thread. Political correctness is a form of STFU and is one of the biggest dangers we have to our constitution. No different than Obama speaking of Limbaugh and Beck
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites