How can people be this hypocritically stupid?

[Lucky... 0]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100409/ap_on_re_us/us_republicans_gingrich

Gingrich: Obama is 'most radical president ever'

He urged his fellow Republicans to stop what he called Obama's "secular, socialist machine."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

So Gingri(n)ch is the anti-secular, moral monitor. Great, now explain this: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/06/24/1976721.aspx

Republican Newt Gingrich (2007): As he was weighing a 2008 presidential run, the former speaker acknowledged -- in an interview with the Christian conservative group Focus on the Family -- having had an extramarital affair during the 1990s.

So he is an admitted adulterer, yet he is calling someone the evil, secular bastard. The right is fortunately still all fucked up, I wouldn't count on a take-back any time soon.

Oh, is there evidence that Obama ever cheated? That really makes this rich; a cheater calling a Christian man who is known only as faitful, secular.

Really pathetic, kids.

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[mnealtx 0]

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

Yes, but we forgive you anyway.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Calling him secular is the irony, perhaps that was too obvious for you to see. Also, the concept that Obama is some secular sinner and Gingrich is the moral Christian monitor of the country, yet he is an adulterer. These are obvious concepts, pretending to not understand them doesn't make them less obvious, it just makes obvious the fact that you don't want to acknowledge the hypocrisy in your party.

Also, shall we talk the Clinton impeachment? We know who spearheaded that. I know, I know, it wasabout perjury and obstruction, but what prompted the hearings? Oh yea, adultery ala Gongrich-style.

Hillarious

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Calling him secular is the irony, perhaps that was too obvious for you to see. Also, the concept that Obama is some secular sinner and Gingrich is the moral Christian monitor of the country, yet he is an adulterer. These are obvious concepts, pretending to not understand them doesn't make them less obvious, it just makes obvious the fact that you don't want to acknowledge the hypocrisy in your party.

Also, shall we talk the Clinton impeachment? We know who spearheaded that. I know, I know, it wasabout perjury and obstruction, but what prompted the hearings? Oh yea, adultery ala Gongrich-style.

Hillarious

Clinton commited a felony
He should have been thrown out of office

I would take him back to day however

Given the piss poor example of a leader we have today

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Calling him secular is the irony, perhaps that was too obvious for you to see. Also, the concept that Obama is some secular sinner and Gingrich is the moral Christian monitor of the country, yet he is an adulterer. These are obvious concepts, pretending to not understand them doesn't make them less obvious, it just makes obvious the fact that you don't want to acknowledge the hypocrisy in your party.

Also, shall we talk the Clinton impeachment? We know who spearheaded that. I know, I know, it wasabout perjury and obstruction, but what prompted the hearings? Oh yea, adultery ala Gongrich-style.

Hillarious

Clinton commited a felony
He should have been thrown out of office

I would take him back to day however

Given the piss poor example of a leader we have today

But to call a man into congress ON THE REASON THAT HE COMMITTED ADULTERY is what initiated the congressional hearings is pathetic, esp considering the spearheader of teh deal was Gingrich, a soon after adulterer himself. Now Gingrich calls Obama secular.

So how do you feel about Scooter Libby? Should your hero have commuted his sentence? Should your other hero have gotten his way and pardoned him? I see, no wanty to talk abouty.

[Darius11 12]

Quote

'most radical president ever

I think thats just because he is black.

I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Calling him secular is the irony, perhaps that was too obvious for you to see. Also, the concept that Obama is some secular sinner and Gingrich is the moral Christian monitor of the country, yet he is an adulterer. These are obvious concepts, pretending to not understand them doesn't make them less obvious, it just makes obvious the fact that you don't want to acknowledge the hypocrisy in your party.

Also, shall we talk the Clinton impeachment? We know who spearheaded that. I know, I know, it wasabout perjury and obstruction, but what prompted the hearings? Oh yea, adultery ala Gongrich-style.

Hillarious

Clinton commited a felony
He should have been thrown out of office

I would take him back to day however

Given the piss poor example of a leader we have today

But to call a man into congress ON THE REASON THAT HE COMMITTED ADULTERY is what initiated the congressional hearings is pathetic, esp considering the spearheader of teh deal was Gingrich, a soon after adulterer himself. Now Gingrich calls Obama secular.

So how do you feel about Scooter Libby? Should your hero have commuted his sentence? Should your other hero have gotten his way and pardoned him? I see, no wanty to talk abouty.

That is not why he was called in there

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Andy9o8 2]

Quote

Clinton commited a felony

If you're going to start that shit, then Oliver North committed a felony, too. You really want to do this?

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Clinton commited a felony

If you're going to start that shit, then Oliver North committed a felony, too. You really want to do this?

If a thread is started about that, then yes

But why clinton was called in and what he did has been so bastardized by the left it is funny

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Calling him secular is the irony, perhaps that was too obvious for you to see. Also, the concept that Obama is some secular sinner and Gingrich is the moral Christian monitor of the country, yet he is an adulterer. These are obvious concepts, pretending to not understand them doesn't make them less obvious, it just makes obvious the fact that you don't want to acknowledge the hypocrisy in your party.

Also, shall we talk the Clinton impeachment? We know who spearheaded that. I know, I know, it wasabout perjury and obstruction, but what prompted the hearings? Oh yea, adultery ala Gongrich-style.

Hillarious

Ok, so it's one of your (so called) normal rants - no prob.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

Quote

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

Yes, but we forgive you anyway.

Uh, for what?
You're the one here who continually posts their hatred of those whose political views are not inline with your own.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[turtlespeed 220]

Quote

Quote

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

Yes, but we forgive you anyway.

The worst part of this,actually the most humorous, is that you REALLY DO believe that there is no irony in what you post.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

Yes, but we forgive you anyway.

Uh, for what?
You're the one here who continually posts their hatred of those whose political views are not inline with your own.

This is hatred: How can people be this hypocritically stupid

You must be one of those thenthitive types.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

Yes, but we forgive you anyway.

The worst part of this,actually the most humorous, is that you REALLY DO believe that there is no irony in what you post.

The real and expected irony os that you never address the issue, but the author. Not real ironic, actually, more like routine.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Maybe you can show just WHERE in the article Gingrich accused Obama of infidelity - you know, something to prove your claim.

Or, we could just write it off as one of your 'normal' diatribes.

Calling him secular is the irony, perhaps that was too obvious for you to see. Also, the concept that Obama is some secular sinner and Gingrich is the moral Christian monitor of the country, yet he is an adulterer. These are obvious concepts, pretending to not understand them doesn't make them less obvious, it just makes obvious the fact that you don't want to acknowledge the hypocrisy in your party.

Also, shall we talk the Clinton impeachment? We know who spearheaded that. I know, I know, it wasabout perjury and obstruction, but what prompted the hearings? Oh yea, adultery ala Gongrich-style.

Hillarious

Ok, so it's one of your (so called) normal rants - no prob.

And you have no substanive realy to the issues - ok.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

Clinton commited a felony

If you're going to start that shit, then Oliver North committed a felony, too. You really want to do this?

Besides, I thought Clinton was cleared (in a political trial - a low standard of proof), just like Reagan in Iran-Contra, etc. However, Libby was convicted in a crminal court, a much higher standard.

[Lucky... 0]

Oh tell us why Clinton was called in and questioned about Lewinsky.

[timmyfitz 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Almost as pathetic as someone who spews forth hatred on this forum condemning another's morals.

Pot, meet kettle.

Yes, but we forgive you anyway.

The worst part of this,actually the most humorous, is that you REALLY DO believe that there is no irony in what you post.

Yes, many people that read his post get a good chuckle. I know I do.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

'most radical president ever

I think thats just because he is black.

Or is it because he's secular? You know those seculars, they're all evil. And radical

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

And you have no substanive realy to the issues - ok.

Not at all - it's just that your virulent hatred isn't worth rebutting.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Andy9o8 2]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Clinton commited a felony

If you're going to start that shit, then Oliver North committed a felony, too. You really want to do this?

Besides, I thought Clinton was cleared (in a political trial - a low standard of proof), just like Reagan in Iran-Contra, etc. However, Libby was convicted in a crminal court, a much higher standard.

North was convicted of felonies by a federal court jury. His conviction was later reversed on appeal on technical grounds.

[happythoughts 0]

If there was a possibility of debating his assessment of Obama, you have successfully avoided it.

I thought the question was whether Obama had secular, socialist policies.

The Dems have never regarded moral standing as
a necessity to offer an opinion. Why is it necessary for NG ?

Let's face it, Hillary became a laughing stock over her
"lie of the week" campaign. Even the Dems on this forum
were embarrassed by her announcements.

I can understand your willingness to attack the accuser
instead of the content.
Obama is adding the biggest social programs to the govt ever.

"Obama - socialism for the rich, democracy for the poor"

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

Oh tell us why Clinton was called in and questioned about Lewinsky.

He was under investigation for perjury in connection with the sexual harassement lawsuit brought against him by Paula Jones. You know that. But you, as always, will spin it so it was the evil Republicans fault he lied under oath.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.