0
rhys

Cheney, Bush and Rumsfeld knowingly keep innocent civilians in order to invade.

Recommended Posts

Quote

yes, the war crimes cry tends to come from people who don't understand what those are, and have translated it into "he did stuff I didn't approve of." You see similar idiots who go on about impeaching officials they disagree with.

Bush is Texan - they think their state is the holy land, and no reason for anyone to go anywhere else. I'm sure he's happily retired away and having fun on the ranch. Even when he was President he couldn't stay away.



I have a second cousin who is a lawyer at the Hague. They are ready to go. Timing will be quite interesting, according to what we hear on the family email list.

Shrub bought the ranch in 1999, just before he ran for POTUS. It was part of the marketing effort for his campaign that you morons lapped up like skydivers do beer. He lives in Dalls and doesn't go the ranch much. That is why the restricted airspace just got shrunk down to almost nothing. The weasel shit will sell it as soon as the real estate market turns around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I have a second cousin who is a lawyer at the Hague. They are ready to go. Timing will be quite interesting, according to what we hear on the family email list.



I know what Chaney's response to this would be:

"Go Fuck Yourself"

It would be very entertaining to me if they did make such a try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The diff is that on this side we provide data, not some FOX article.



If you click on the link on the first post, you will se a current Fox news article on this bush admnistration whistleblower,it is big news.

The right wing neo cunts will just deny it for a couple of days, apathy will set back in, and back to business as usual after that, back to blatant corruption and war crimes.

It s quite pathetic, no one has got a spine anymore.

Too fucking scared to look stupid or 'out of line'.

Weak as weak can be... Just go with the flow.

Morons! those you protect will shit on you at the drop of a hat.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Instead of beating a dead horse, why don't you preach about how suicide bombers in Iraq kill dozens of people indiscriminately, including children and small dogs.




I dislike ‘anyone’ that harms someone unnecessarily.

You are defending the practice of incarcerating innocent people in order to wage a war that is built on false pretences, the murder of innocent people.

That is immoral.

You could say nothing or agree that innocent people should not be kept, but instead you either want to disagree with me, or you want to defend these actions.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Instead of beating a dead horse, why don't you preach about how suicide bombers in Iraq kill dozens of people indiscriminately, including children and small dogs.




I dislike ‘anyone’ that harms someone unnecessarily.

You are defending the practice of incarcerating innocent people in order to wage a war that is built on false pretences, the murder of innocent people.

That is immoral.

You could say nothing or agree that innocent people should not be kept, but instead you either want to disagree with me, or you want to defend these actions.



Once again you spout dribble in response to a post without reading it first. Nowhere did I defend Cheney, Bush, and/or Rumsfeld.
HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I have a second cousin who is a lawyer at the Hague. They are ready to go. Timing will be quite interesting, according to what we hear on the family email list.



I know what Chaney's response to this would be:

"Go Fuck Yourself"

It would be very entertaining to me if they did make such a try.



Which is what Saddam's position was, I wonder if the outcome could be the same??? They really have so much in common.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The diff is that on this side we provide data, not some FOX article.



If you click on the link on the first post, you will se a current Fox news article on this bush admnistration whistleblower,it is big news.

The right wing neo cunts will just deny it for a couple of days, apathy will set back in, and back to business as usual after that, back to blatant corruption and war crimes.

It s quite pathetic, no one has got a spine anymore.

Too fucking scared to look stupid or 'out of line'.

Weak as weak can be... Just go with the flow.

Morons! those you protect will shit on you at the drop of a hat.



Sure, they're called nationalists; this forum is full of them. Nazi Germany had them everywhere, or be shoved in a concentration camp, bad thing is that Americans don't have to be one to survive, they want to be one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Instead of beating a dead horse, why don't you preach about how suicide bombers in Iraq kill dozens of people indiscriminately, including children and small dogs.




I dislike ‘anyone’ that harms someone unnecessarily.

You are defending the practice of incarcerating innocent people in order to wage a war that is built on false pretences, the murder of innocent people.

That is immoral.

You could say nothing or agree that innocent people should not be kept, but instead you either want to disagree with me, or you want to defend these actions.


Once again you spout dribble in response to a post without reading it first. Nowhere did I defend Cheney, Bush, and/or Rumsfeld.


Right, you do so indirectly, then sit in the middle and say, "what, me?"

Go build a trailer you pseudo acft engineer. :D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Instead of beating a dead horse, why don't you preach about how suicide bombers in Iraq kill dozens of people indiscriminately, including children and small dogs.




I dislike ‘anyone’ that harms someone unnecessarily.

You are defending the practice of incarcerating innocent people in order to wage a war that is built on false pretences, the murder of innocent people.

That is immoral.

You could say nothing or agree that innocent people should not be kept, but instead you either want to disagree with me, or you want to defend these actions.


Once again you spout dribble in response to a post without reading it first. Nowhere did I defend Cheney, Bush, and/or Rumsfeld.


Right, you do so indirectly, then sit in the middle and say, "what, me?"

Go build a trailer you pseudo acft engineer. :D:D:D


At least I'm working. :D:D:D:D
HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Which is what Saddam's position was, I wonder if the outcome could be the same??? They really have so much in common.



The biggest difference of many is that Saddam lost. Losers commit war crimes, not winners.

Then if you want to go further - he killed millions while Bush imprisoned thousands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Once again you spout dribble in response to a post without reading it first. Nowhere did I defend Cheney, Bush, and/or Rumsfeld.





Thanks for the laugh buddy;).
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Instead of beating a dead horse, why don't you preach about how suicide bombers in Iraq kill dozens of people indiscriminately, including children and small dogs.




I dislike ‘anyone’ that harms someone unnecessarily.

You are defending the practice of incarcerating innocent people in order to wage a war that is built on false pretences, the murder of innocent people.

That is immoral.

You could say nothing or agree that innocent people should not be kept, but instead you either want to disagree with me, or you want to defend these actions.


Once again you spout dribble in response to a post without reading it first. Nowhere did I defend Cheney, Bush, and/or Rumsfeld.


Right, you do so indirectly, then sit in the middle and say, "what, me?"

Go build a trailer you pseudo acft engineer. :D:D:D


At least I'm working. :D:D:D:D


Shit, that place I go everyday I thought was my workplace. Hmm, they give me a check every week and I kick ass for them, oh well, guess I'm not working. :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The biggest difference of many is that Saddam lost. Losers commit war crimes, not winners.



Right, the winners get to write the history books. G Bay had admitted war crimes known, yet you consider us the winner? You can't even write a sentence w/o contradiction, can you? How about the troops that raped the 14 YO girl and kiled the family? No war crimes there, altho that is isolated, it is a war crime.

Shall we talk the American Indian? Yea, I would just let that little dream of yours go, WE HAVE AND DO COMMIT NUMEROUS WAR CRIMES. The best way to avoid war crimes: don't enter war unless it is absolutley necc.

Quote

Then if you want to go further - he killed millions while Bush imprisoned thousands.



Bush directed G Bay and Abu Graib (sp). There were numerous war crimes commited; let it go, you just keep stepping all over yourself. And to compare GWB to Saddam is very keenl I agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmmm....musta been another "lucky" that posted in a thread here not more than a few days ago that he wasn't working much these days.

You never have told me what you find demeaning about building trailers. Care explain?
HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Once again you spout dribble in response to a post without reading it first. Nowhere did I defend Cheney, Bush, and/or Rumsfeld.





Thanks for the laugh buddy;).



Really? Care to point out where I defended them?
HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0