Andy9o8 2 #51 June 6, 2010 QuoteGuns don't kill people, people do. And they do it by whatever methods available. No doubt. But it doesn't make one a Commie gun-o-phobe (deserving of two to the chest) to observe that some methods are more... mmm ...... efficient than others. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #52 June 7, 2010 QuoteIt's exactly what you wrote. . Apparently the concept of "difference" in arithmetic escapes you.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #53 June 7, 2010 QuoteGuns don't kill people, people do. And they do it by whatever methods available. Your assumption that all murders would take place without guns around is just as false as stating no murders would take place without guns around. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #54 June 7, 2010 QuoteQuoteGuns don't kill people, people do. And they do it by whatever methods available. Your assumption that all murders would take place without guns around is just as false as stating no murders would take place without guns around. But I'm not stating that all murders would take place. But I know that many more than "none" would. Oh, and guns will remain available in any scenario, just not for citizens, so no legal self defense. UK has already proven that an amply supply of guns will exist to meet criminal demands (and simple desire). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #55 June 8, 2010 Though in this case it should be noted that both firearms used were legally owned. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
