Recommended Posts
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI reckon that Religion is ALL about power, power & control [full stop]
So, there's almost no differentiate between it and Politics.
On target. It is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior that counts, not religion.
Or the choice to not have one. Of course I'm just being Constitutional, now back to your imposed Christianity.
There is no such thing as imposed Christianity according to the Holy Bible. There is only repentance and free will choice.
Right, but in application and from you saying a president must be Christian to be considered you are saying that as you want him to rule/preside from the bible, hence impose Christianity down our fucking throats.
This concept violates the 1st. Amazing how neo-cons hide the constitution some times, wave it vigorously others.
I did not say a president must be Christian.
Lucky... 0
QuoteQuote
I do not belong to a party.
Riiiiight. Hey do us a favor and list all of the presidents you voted for over the years. I have done this, but see, you won't because we will all be seeing red amidst you claiming not to belong to any party. Riiiight, we get ya.
I used to be a member of the Republican Party. Two years ago I resigned and am now No Party Affiliation.
Right, so you're an older gentleman with 40 years voting as a Republican, now you're a registered independent voting as a Republican; that clears it up. What caused you to resign, McCain too much a turd for you? Symbolism? But you still vote R down theline, let's be real. And a vote for L is still a vote for R.
Lucky... 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI reckon that Religion is ALL about power, power & control [full stop]
So, there's almost no differentiate between it and Politics.
On target. It is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior that counts, not religion.
Or the choice to not have one. Of course I'm just being Constitutional, now back to your imposed Christianity.
There is no such thing as imposed Christianity according to the Holy Bible. There is only repentance and free will choice.
Right, but in application and from you saying a president must be Christian to be considered you are saying that as you want him to rule/preside from the bible, hence impose Christianity down our fucking throats.
This concept violates the 1st. Amazing how neo-cons hide the constitution some times, wave it vigorously others.
I did not say a president must be Christian.
Oh, I see, but you did write:
On target. It is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior that counts, not religion.
So you want a president who has a personal relationship with Jebus, but who is not necessarily a Christian. Now I'm really confused.
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuoteQuote
I do not belong to a party.
Riiiiight. Hey do us a favor and list all of the presidents you voted for over the years. I have done this, but see, you won't because we will all be seeing red amidst you claiming not to belong to any party. Riiiight, we get ya.
I used to be a member of the Republican Party. Two years ago I resigned and am now No Party Affiliation.
Right, so you're an older gentleman with 40 years voting as a Republican, now you're a registered independent voting as a Republican; that clears it up. What caused you to resign, McCain too much a turd for you? Symbolism? But you still vote R down theline, let's be real. And a vote for L is still a vote for R.
You don't know who I voted for and it is not any of your business. I resigned because there were too many Republican fags in political prominence.
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI reckon that Religion is ALL about power, power & control [full stop]
So, there's almost no differentiate between it and Politics.
On target. It is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior that counts, not religion.
Or the choice to not have one. Of course I'm just being Constitutional, now back to your imposed Christianity.
There is no such thing as imposed Christianity according to the Holy Bible. There is only repentance and free will choice.
Right, but in application and from you saying a president must be Christian to be considered you are saying that as you want him to rule/preside from the bible, hence impose Christianity down our fucking throats.
This concept violates the 1st. Amazing how neo-cons hide the constitution some times, wave it vigorously others.
I did not say a president must be Christian.
Oh, I see, but you did write:
On target. It is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior that counts, not religion.
So you want a president who has a personal relationship with Jebus, but who is not necessarily a Christian. Now I'm really confused.
No, I prefer that he be a professing Christian with the fruit of his behavior to back it up. That is much different from saying, "he must be a Christian."
Andy9o8 2
QuoteNo, I prefer that he be a professing Christian with the fruit of his behavior to back it up. That is much different from saying, "he must be a Christian."
In practice, it's really no difference at all.
If any, the difference is purely semantic: not what a president is, but what you prefer him NOT to be: anything that is openly and expressly not Christian.
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuoteNo, I prefer that he be a professing Christian with the fruit of his behavior to back it up. That is much different from saying, "he must be a Christian."
In practice, it's really no difference at all.
If any, the difference is purely semantic: not what a president is, but what you prefer him NOT to be: anything that is openly and expressly not Christian.
OK, I'll own that. It still don't mean squat.
Andy9o8 2
QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, I prefer that he be a professing Christian with the fruit of his behavior to back it up. That is much different from saying, "he must be a Christian."
In practice, it's really no difference at all.
If any, the difference is purely semantic: not what a president is, but what you prefer him NOT to be: anything that is openly and expressly not Christian.
OK, I'll own that. It still don't mean squat.
Sure it does. It means you're one of many who feel that anyone of a religion other than Christianity should not be president.
Right, but in application and from you saying a president must be Christian to be considered you are saying that as you want him to rule/preside from the bible, hence impose Christianity down our fucking throats.
This concept violates the 1st. Amazing how neo-cons hide the constitution some times, wave it vigorously others.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites