0
turtlespeed

Death Penalty

Recommended Posts

Quote

There have been a number of high profile cases where I felt the killer got what he deserved (John Wayne Gacy or Ted Bundy for instance). There are some undoubtably guilty people who have committed really horrifying crimes and otherwise led worthless garbage lives. I don't feel a thing for them.

But those are my emotions speaking. The FACT is that far too many people have been erroneously convicted of crimes they did not commit. Some of them have been proven innocent by DNA and released, after losing years or whole decades of their lives in prison. Others have gone to their deaths.

Not even DNA is a foolproof safeguard. Not when police are under pressure to solve a highly emotional case (a child murdered, an elderly woman raped and murdered, a police officer killed in the line of duty). Not when the police are stumped and they've got "some asshole" in custody who they don't like anyway. Not when police and prosecutors are willing to give perjured testimony, offer breaks to convicted and unreliable felon witnesses, or to withold evidence from the defense, which they are by law required to share - but don't anyway. Not when judges are up for re-election and don't want to be viewed as "soft on crime" because they may have put the pursuit of justice, or the truth, ahead of everyone else's desire for revenge.

Consider that when eastern Europe got free of Communist domination in the early 1990's, the first thing ALL of those countries did was to abolish their death penalties. They knew from their own hard experience how the death penalty is abused by the state in the name of "public safety".

Finally, if you can't even trust the goverment to deliver a letter, why would you trust that same government to excercise the power of life or death over ANYONE ?



The above is a pretty good statement of how I feel, too.

In this particular case (Lee's murder), yes.

But overall, no. So I voted no.

I only have to look at Illinois.

More innocent inmates were released from death row than were executed in recent years there. It's one of the reasons that then-Gov Ryan commuted all of the death sentences in 03.

The wrongfullly convicted weren't freed on appeal, nor by remorseful proscutors or cops who realized thay had convicted the wrong person. They were freed by the Innocence Project.

As tbrown pointed out, cops who need to produce a suspect, prosecutors who need to produce a conviction and communities that need closure on a horrific crime can easily find a scapegoat.

And they will rarely admit that they convicted the wrong person, or used faulty evidence.

They often fight tooth and nail to execute a person who is clearly not guilty.

So even though there are many high profile cases that probably deserve the death penalty (Dahmer, Lee Boyd Malvo, Richard Ramirez and on and on), the system is too flawed for me to support it at all.
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you are right on alot of points..from the non emotional side of it I do agree with you. I donot belive every murder should be put to death. Some of the most non-violent inmates were sentenced to life for murder. A one time crime they would not commit again. But those murders were a crime of passion, not-planned with no MO (modus operandi).
Lee's death was brutal and not a crime of passion, the perp was not in immenant danger. It was more planned, more brutal throughout the night and evidence was trying to be covered up by the arson commited. There was total Mens Rea ( criminal thinking) In order to be sentenced to death or life, there has to be proof of MO and Mens Rea. Who here can deny that Lee's murderer did not have that?
Who can deny the brutalness to it? Who can deny the attempt to cover up the evidence?
As far as inmates in Illinois are concerned, there was a massive riot that killed many guards. The state of Illinois then became a max state at one point and all prisons were locked down. Many inmates on death row were released due to DNA evidence. Inmates do serve up to 20 years waiting to die...that is the governments fault. There should be one appeal and one appeal only. It depends on the state as to how much it costs to keep someone in prison. Wisconsin is about 40,000 a year. The prison system is a warehouse for criminals and the only rehab is what the inmate does for himself.
Sexually deviant people are wired that way. You can cut off a rapists junk...he will just rape with an object. Serial killers will never rehab, severe criminal thinkers will never rehab. Our recidivism rate is over 80 percent. China's recidivism rate is 10 percent. Think about that.
" Mean people SUCK!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> Many inmates on death row were released due to DNA evidence.

OK.

>Inmates do serve up to 20 years waiting to die...that is the governments
>fault. There should be one appeal and one appeal only.

?? So you're saying that the people who were, much later, proven to be innocent via DNA evidence should have been put to death years ago?

If we're regularly screwing up due to errors in the justice system, and much later realizing we're wrong, that's the strongest argument AGAINST the death penalty there is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Our recidivism rate is over 80 percent. China's recidivism rate is 10 percent. Think about that.



I'm notteh biggest fan of the US on a few levels, but let's be real, I don't think we need to borrow anything from the pages of Chinese government.

What % of their executions are of innocent people? Right, so you advocate the expeditious killing of convicts, some of which are 100% innocent, to further the idea of deterrence of crime against innocent people? :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
China also lists crimes such as tax fraud, defacing of national symbols, and theft on their execute list. Last year they executed a British man for smuggling herion into the country. As far as a country - I wouldn't want to base our legal system on China's, they aren't known for scoring high on humanitarian rights....
Andrea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
very true and correct. I was talking more of how China runs their prisons. The inmates cannot have t.v's or radios. They are not allowed to wear personal cloths. They eat bagged meals instead of being fed better than our millions of starving americans..I do not agreee with just killing to kill as far as the death penalty is concerned. I never stated that anywhere in this thread.
To keep to the point...Lee's killer was brutal, the arson was an attempt to cover up the crime, and there was MO and Mens Rea.
" Mean people SUCK!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do hope that this man, guilty of a horrible crime, as well as guilty of the emotional pain that all of those who love Lee are feeling, never has the opportunity to be amongst free men again.
I agree with you in point also - our prison system is seriously in trouble. You have seen the inside of these human warehouses - they are nothing more than a training ground for violent crime. Entire criminal empires are run from within the walls of these places. There is something seriously wrong with that picture.
There is very little effective about our system of punishment - we have the highest percentage of incarcerated persons of any country in the world - yet we've shown no negligible affect on crime.
But I digress...the question still is on the death penalty. And in a system so radically flawed as ours, where justice is often determined on greenbacks - the poor and the minorities bearing the brunt of injustice in this country, and so prone to human emotion and error, I can't - even in the case of this kind of violent, unthinkable, murder, be a proponent of the death penalty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In this case:

The DNA evidence consisted of only two samples, they were from the victim and the defendant.

The defendant was "ratted out" and apparently confessed to the crime to his cell mate.

There was video evidence of the defendant using monetary items that could only have been obtained after the incident.

As I understand it, Lee was stabbed, and beaten with a shovel. Somehere in the time line, forced into a closed trailer, driven into another county, and then expired after a struggle and because of blood loss.

The trailer was set on fire.

Then, he showed up to the victims house professing to be a friend, eating their food, drinking their liquor.

He was arrested down the street from the victims house after his second visit.



Actually, this is exactly a case in point that I have no sympathy whatever for the bastard. This is a very emotional case, the victim was known to many of us here on this forum. I never met him, but knew him somewhat as a fellow skydiver and dot.commer. In this case, I agree there was more than ample evidence, and given the pride Florida takes in its death penalty I don't think this guy has - or deserves - much more time to live.

But I'm addressing the broader overall picture. I encourage you to read "The Thin Blue Line", by Randall Adams. Adams was a no-account, pot smoking drifter, who one night hitched a ride from some young kid. He and the kid fired up a joint and the kid drove off into the night. That night the kid got pulled over by a cop and shot the cop dead.

To make a long story short, Adams was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death for the murder. Guess who the star witness for the state was - the kid who actually committed the crime !

Adams was indigent and was given a useless lawyer who failed to challenge any of the evidence, any of the testimony, or any of the procedural errors. There is documented proof that prosecutors witheld evidence from the defense that they were required by law to share. There is documented evidence that several police officers rehearsed and gave perjured testimony. Adams met with a state psychiatrist who pronounced him a "vicious psychopath" in front of the jury. This psychiatrist was in the habit of giving the same testimony in every case he ever testified - the state paid him handsomely and the jury believed him - after all, he WAS a doctor.

Adams came VERY close, within a day or two, of going to the electric chair. Someone took an interest in his case and pointed up enough procedural errors that his sentence was commuted to life without parole. Eventually, years later, his conviction was thrown out and the state declined to re-try him. (The kid finally admitted in court to "having seen the whole thing", as well as admitting he was the only person present. He was clever enough to never admit actually pulling the trigger.)

This was a clear case of misconduct and abuse by authorities who weren't even interested in finding the real killer. They only wanted to look good by nabbing some "worthless bum" and frying his ass. Randall Adams was not an isolated case either. He was part of a pattern of the abuse of power that our Constitution is meant to protect us all from. All power corrupts those who have it. If we give the power of life and death to the state, they WILL inevitably abuse it. And in too many cases, some famous (Sacco & Vanzetti, et al) and too many unknown cases, they have repeatedly done so. It is a power we should not allow the state to have - there is NO effective safeguard against its abuse.

Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do honor your opinion. I felt the same way until I worked in the prison and saw what I saw. In college my thesis was on prison reform. There is none and never will be. The inmates run the prisons. If they want correcitonal officers to have a bad day, they will riot or kill. I only belive in the death penalty in cases where it is a brutal murder, a hight profile rapist, child killer-rapist and the chances of that perp doing it again are high.
CHILD RAPISTS
SERIAL KILLERS
MASS MURDERERS
If I could decide I would vote the above perps of the crimes to be dropped off on an island amongst themselves with no protection against each other, bags of seeds to feed themselves and let them do what they will do. But that will never happen.
Why do people convicted of a felony of carrying 2 ounces of pot get sentenced to a MAX prison and never get out. They have to join up with a gang, kill a guard or another inmate to live.....be protected. They will recieve a life sentance for murder when they went to a max for pot.
Then they take the max inmates and classify them to med security to make room for non-violent felons!
It will never end.
If the above crimes in caps where put to death with only one appeal......that would make room to classify inmates correctly and hopefully start to do something about our overloaded prisons. [:/]

" Mean people SUCK!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
totally agree that case was bum. I personally knew of an inmate in my cell hall that was convicted of raping and killing a female friend. The cops put on wigs and did an outside line up with _____put him at the end and he was obviously identified wrongly. He spent 20 years in that prison. DNA evidence came forth and he appealed. 3 years later his case was overturned and he could have walked out of that prison with a payment of 2 million dollars. He was jumped the next day by Black Gangsters, had to defend his life.....by throwing that inmate over the 4th tier. He is now serving a real life sentance for that conviction.
Yes, our system is flawed. What system is not. Does that justify letting the inmates I cased above in caps living, breathing, and dying of old age in a comfortable bunk? I think not.
Lifers do not care about anything. They kill each other, kill the guards protecting the public from them escaping.......and your paying for it! I would rather pay taxes to put them on death row in a solitary cell.......death row inmates do not go to general population. They may live another 10-20 years until our system fixies how many appeals...but the remainder of their lives is spent with NO CONTACT WITH ANYONE, in a single cell.....they're recreation period is in a cage not allowed contact with other inmates.....they are only allowed 1 visit per month....no personal cloths, seg loaves for food instead of 3 hots a day.....or bagged meals.
Their remaining lives in that cell until put to death is pure hell...............
" Mean people SUCK!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[They will recieve a life sentance for murder when they went to a max for pot.
Then they take the max inmates and classify them to med security to make room for non-violent felons!
It will never end.
If the above crimes in caps where put to death with only one appeal......that would make room to classify inmates correctly and hopefully start to do something about our overloaded prisons. [:/]



Something else we CAN and hopefully will do this November in California is to LEGALIZE the possession and recreational use of marijuana. then we can TAX and regulate its sale and use, the way we already do with alcohol and tobacco. Then we can deal with the health problems that some people do have with its use, eliminate the whole criminal enterprise that currently rules its cultivation and distribution, and keep a lot of innocent users out of jail altogether. The drug laws are why prisons are too overcrowded.

Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sadly, the case of Adams, and many like him, are more common than not. Our system is corrupt, for just a bit of reflection - also google padon board and bribe. There has been numerous "upstanding" men and women who serve on pardon boards who have been tried and convicted of accepting bribes to either uphold the death penalty or pardon it. Howard Marsellus, one of those men who sat on a pardon board openly admitted to believing in the innocence of a man that he upheld the death penalty conviction on, a man named Tim Baldwin who was indeed executed - for a crime he likely did not commit.
While I'm certain no one could argue that pedophiles and serial killers should be set free - it weighs heavy on my personal conscious that we live in a system where the life or death of a person is determined by men and women who are sometimes corrupt, who are always human and therefore prone to error, by lack of or the having of money, and the whims of elected officials - who may not want to appear soft on crime, etc etc etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marsellus, one of those men who sat on a pardon board openly admitted to believing in the innocence of a man that he upheld the death penalty conviction on, a man named Tim Baldwin who was indeed executed - for a crime he likely did not commit.
While I'm certain no one could argue that pedophiles and serial killers should be set free - it weighs heavy on my personal conscious that we live in a system where the life or death of a person is determined by men and women who are sometimes corrupt, who are always human and therefore prone to error, by lack of or the having of money, and the whims of elected officials - who may not want to appear soft on crime, etc etc etc.



Totally understood. But the justice system is flawed. To get a jury of peers..those peers are questioned and grueled by both attorneys. Peers are dismissed and more brought in. The judge can have partial feelings...the jury can have partial feelings. We are all human and do have human emotion. That is why there is an appeal process.
That is why it goes to Federal Court. And it goes on and on. Our justice system is flawed and it will never end. But I feel the way I do on the death penalty.
" Mean people SUCK!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>If I could decide I would vote the above perps of the crimes to be dropped
>off on an island amongst themselves with no protection against each other,
>bags of seeds to feed themselves and let them do what they will do. But
>that will never happen.

That's how a lot of Australians got to Australia - England would exile them there. (Also how some Americans got here; 50,000 Brits were exiled here for various crimes.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>If I could decide I would vote the above perps of the crimes to be dropped
>off on an island amongst themselves with no protection against each other,
>bags of seeds to feed themselves and let them do what they will do. But
>that will never happen.

That's how a lot of Australians got to Australia - England would exile them there. (Also how some Americans got here; 50,000 Brits were exiled here for various crimes.)



That would explain a few posters here.[:/]
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I do honor your opinion. I felt the same way until I worked in the prison and saw what I saw. In college my thesis was on prison reform. There is none and never will be. The inmates run the prisons. If they want correcitonal officers to have a bad day, they will riot or kill. I only belive in the death penalty in cases where it is a brutal murder, a hight profile rapist, child killer-rapist and the chances of that perp doing it again are high.
CHILD RAPISTS
SERIAL KILLERS
MASS MURDERERS
If I could decide I would vote the above perps of the crimes to be dropped off on an island amongst themselves with no protection against each other, bags of seeds to feed themselves and let them do what they will do. But that will never happen.
Why do people convicted of a felony of carrying 2 ounces of pot get sentenced to a MAX prison and never get out. They have to join up with a gang, kill a guard or another inmate to live.....be protected. They will recieve a life sentance for murder when they went to a max for pot.
Then they take the max inmates and classify them to med security to make room for non-violent felons!
It will never end.
If the above crimes in caps where put to death with only one appeal......that would make room to classify inmates correctly and hopefully start to do something about our overloaded prisons. [:/]



What if we later determine they were innocent after years of time went by? You don't seem to want to address that.

BTW, many murderers are nerds, I've seen several convicted.

As for the island thing, they made of movie about that concept; Papillon. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070511/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if we later determine they were innocent after years of time went by? You don't seem to want to address that.

BTW, many murderers are nerds, I've seen several convicted.

As for the island thing, they made of movie about that concept; Papillon. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070511/


I have defended that with what I can with the DNA process that was enabled 15 years ago...it is up to the convicted to appeal and prove their case. That is why the death row inmates sit so long. I again repeat I was not talking about basic once in a life time murderers....I was talking about MASS MURDERERS..SERIAL KILLERS...CHILD RAPISTS-KILLERS- SERIAL RAPISTS...as far as the movie? Never saw it...graduated with my bachlor in 1995
;)
" Mean people SUCK!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0