0
Andy9o8

Christine O'Donnell: Some mice have fully-functioning Human Brains

Recommended Posts

Quote

First of all, you're responding to a month-old post; but whatever.
Be that as it may, Obama's smart and O'Donnell's a fucking twit. Period. Anyhow, what are you complaining about? People have always found comfort in circle-jerking their ignorance; and I did acknowledge in my OP that the moronitude will probably vote her in.



Obama is smart????

He may be intelligent but smart?

Only a twit could believe that now

Talk about circle jerk ignorance

Sheesh


Only the moronitude would believe Obama is smart
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...
B.A.S.E. #1734

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...



NO break will be given
Obama is inept as they have ever come in the office

And I have learned the more the left goes after a person the more qualified they (that person) are

But I rarely post to lefties more than once any more because of the following

"I do not argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"


I classify any who still support Obama the incompetent in this category
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...



NO break will be given
Obama is inept as they have ever come in the office

And I have learned the more the left goes after a person the more qualified they (that person) are

But I rarely post to lefties more than once any more because of the following

"I do not argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"


I classify any who still support Obama the incompetent in this category


What are you rambling on about... This is a thread about O'Donnell and her ignorance no where in my post did I talk about Obama so either stay on topic or go rant in your own thread.
B.A.S.E. #1734

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...



NO break will be given
Obama is inept as they have ever come in the office

And I have learned the more the left goes after a person the more qualified they (that person) are

But I rarely post to lefties more than once any more because of the following

"I do not argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"


I classify any who still support Obama the incompetent in this category


What are you rambling on about... This is a thread about O'Donnell and her ignorance no where in my post did I talk about Obama so either stay on topic or go rant in your own thread.



Which would you rather have in office, Alvin Greene or C. O'Donnell?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

"I do not argue with idiots.



Have you ever wondered why you never argue with yourself?



That veil you are wearing is growing a bit thread bare.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Which would you rather have in office, Alvin Greene or C. O'Donnell?



Nice try; but O'Donnell isn't running against Greene any more than she's running against Obama. She's running against Christopher Coons. So let's compare Coons's background to O'Donnell's, shall we?

CHRIS COONS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Coons#Early_life_and_family

Quote

Early life and family

Coons grew up in Hockessin, Delaware, married Annie Lingenfelter, and has three children. They live in Wilmington, Delaware. He graduated from the Tower Hill School and then Amherst College in 1985 with a B.A. in Chemistry and Political Science, earning a Truman Scholarship. During his junior year of college, Coons studied abroad at the University of Nairobi in Kenya. He earned graduate degrees from both the law and divinity schools at Yale University.[1]

Professional career

After college, Coons worked in Washington, D.C., for the Investor Responsibility Research Center, where he wrote a book on South Africa and the U.S. divestment movement. He then worked as a volunteer for the South African Council of Churches and as a relief worker in Kenya, before returning to the U.S. to work for the Coalition for the Homeless in New York. In 1992, he earned his J.D. degree from Yale Law School, and a master's degree in Ethics from Yale Divinity School.[4]

Coons clerked for Judge Jane Richards Roth on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and then worked for the National "I Have a Dream" Foundation in New York.[5] After returning to Delaware in 1996, Coons began his eight year career as in-house counsel for W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, Delaware-based makers of Gore-Tex fabrics and other high-tech materials. There he was responsible for the ethics training program, federal government relations, e-commerce legal work, and for general commercial contracting.[citation needed]

He has also worked with several non-profits, including the Council for the Homeless, the education-oriented “I Have a Dream” Foundation of Delaware, and the South African Council of Churches, and serves on several boards including First State Innovation, the Bear/Glasgow Boys & Girls Club, and the Delaware College of Art & Design.

Awards and honors

In 1999, he was awarded the Governor's Outstanding Volunteer Award for his work with the "I Have a Dream" Foundation, the Governor's Mentoring Council, and the United Way of Delaware.[citation needed]

Coons has been named an honorary commander of the 166th Air Wing of the Delaware Air National Guard, and is an honorary life member of the Minquadale Fire Company.



CHRISTINE O'DONNELL


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Odonnell#Early_life_and_education

Quote

In 1987, [O'Donnell] graduated from Moorestown High School, where she was a member of the drama club and a student announcer.[1] She attended Fairleigh Dickinson University, where she initially majored in theater.[1][12] In 1993, she went to the graduation ceremony but did not receive a degree.[15] FDU sued her in 1994 for $4,823; the debt was paid in 2003.[5][16] O’Donnell’s 2006 Senate campaign website stated that she was a graduate of Fairleigh Dickinson University, and articles that reported on her 2006 and 2008 campaigns also said she had a degree from FDU.[nb 2][16] In March 2010 she told The News Journal she had finished her course work but her diploma was being withheld because of an unpaid bill.[1] FDU told Politico she was given her degree on September 1, 2010 after she completed coursework during the summer of 2010.[16] O'Donnell later told The New York Times she had had three senior years of college.[12] Her Bachelor of Arts degree is in English literature with a concentration in communications.[3]

In a 2005 lawsuit, O’Donnell implied she was working toward a master's degree at Princeton University, but she later acknowledged she had never taken graduate courses there.[17] She claimed that she had studied at Oxford University in England; but that claim was called "misleading" by The Washington Post as she took only a course run by an unaffiliated institution that was renting space at Oxford.[17][18] As of late September 2010, O'Donnell's LinkedIn profile stated that she had studied Constitutional Government at Claremont Graduate University near Los Angeles, California;[19] but Claremont said it had no record for her.[17][20] When asked specifically about her profile on three occasions by the Associated Press and The Washington Post, O'Donnell's staff made no reference to the profile being unauthorized. A few days later, however, when O’Donnell’s possible academic embellishments became an issue, O'Donnell said, "I never established a LinkedIn profile or authorized anyone to do so on my behalf.” [21] Soon after, O’Donnell’s staff asked LinkedIn to remove the profile.[22][23]




So between O'Donnell and Coons, who would I rather have in office? Coons, because he's a bright, capable, accomplished person; while by comparison (or even not by comparison), O'Donnell is a fucking twit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Yeah, the professional politicians have done one hell of a job with this country haven't they !
DO NOT REELECT ANY ONE ! It's the only way that these bastards and bastardettes will learn they work for us.



While a popular sentiment for better than the past 100 years, it's too extreme. If sitting politicians are never re-elected, institutional memory and competence at the managerial levels of government will always be at the rookie level. But capable management needs to have some experienced hands at the helm. The better solution is a balancing of competing interests: re-elect people who have shown to have a reasonable level of competence, but have term limits to keep them from becoming too entrenched, and to maintain a supply of fresh blood in the system.



well then there is a simple answer, term limits and progression. must serve 2 terms in state office, then 2 terms in the house then 2 terms in the senate. You cannot move to the next level without first serving in the lower office. only the best will move to the next level. if a couple bad apples do get to the next level they would be weeded out going to the senate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...



NO break will be given
Obama is inept as they have ever come in the office

And I have learned the more the left goes after a person the more qualified they (that person) are

But I rarely post to lefties more than once any more because of the following

"I do not argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"


I classify any who still support Obama the incompetent in this category

What are you rambling on about... This is a thread about O'Donnell and her ignorance no where in my post did I talk about Obama so either stay on topic or go rant in your own thread.


:D

Cant handle it can you

Come on dude
Man up
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...



On another note

Please show me where separation of church and state are printed in the Constitution? I know where the congress shall write no law is but I am interested in your input

Also, I dont think anyone denies that speicies evolve and change but, taking it to the man from monkeys level is yet just a theory ?

I do know the media is having fun with this and you seem to be drinking the kool aid

Good place to leave this I guess
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Yeah, the professional politicians have done one hell of a job with this country haven't they !
DO NOT REELECT ANY ONE ! It's the only way that these bastards and bastardettes will learn they work for us.



V.O.T.E.

Vote Out The Elected. As a group, they have failed us miserably. Kick them all to the curb. Send the message, hand every single national elected official their departure ticket. Let's see if that wakes up the collective group of assholes known as politicians.



How do you feel about a challenger, who, for example, is totally clueless about what is in the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution?



AHA! She asked about the CONSITITUTION, not any stinking AMENDMENTS!

Boy, if you have to resort to amendments, addenda and footnotes to bolster your argument, your argument is pretty weak.

I see where she's coming from. The Consitution recognizes the Government as being a God-given institution, and it was only the insertion of seditious language in the form of amendments that denied that obvious fact. Thus, we are now on the slippery slope to disaster.

Maybe by electing enough such elightened legislators we can undo the damage that has been done to our system of government by means of Amendments.

Of course, being a woman she would not be able to vote on anything - I am not sure if that would apply to her position in the Senate.

Also, I would like to know how we would be refunded for the slaves that were confiscated - and are now beyond their expiration date.

Since "free speech" is now anything that does not involve a Thoughtcrime, I do not think anyone will notice when that goes away.

There is a lot of stuff that gets in the way of our going back to the Good Old Days that will not be a problem when all those pesky Amendments are removed.

We are not Mice! We are Devo!


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So in other words - you don't like the obvious answer to the question, so your only recourse is to change the question to suit an answer that you think better suits what you want to believe in.

Is that accurate?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Which would you rather have in office, Alvin Greene or C. O'Donnell?



Six of one, half a dozen of the other. A moron by any other name....

I agree that either party is capable of coming up with a lowest-common-denominator candidate, and that either of these people are at the low end of the short-bus population.

To argue for either of them is like discussing whether horse or mule droppings are "superior" - anyone who is willing to go for a taste test is free to do so, but I will take it on faith that they are interchangeable.

Mediocrity has no political affiliation (though saying that either of these candidates is merely "mediocre" is giving them unwarrented credit).


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

"I do not argue with idiots.



Have you ever wondered why you never argue with yourself?



Nice personal attack on this another poster. Did the greenies let this one slide because they have yet to see it? Or do the DorkZone greenies have some other agenda going on here?

Back on topic ... Christine O'Donnell appears to be a very poor candidate. But so is her opponent. What is up with the people of Delaware? Are these two the best you could come up with? Dang!!! Glad I don't need to worry about voting in Delaware. If I was, I would definitely be penciling in "None of the Above" on my ballot.


Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I see where she's coming from. The Consitution recognizes the Government as being a God-given institution, and it was only the insertion of seditious language in the form of amendments that denied that obvious fact. Thus, we are now on the slippery slope to disaster.



You could not be any more wrong, even if you gave it an ounce of thought! You should take some time and learn what you do not know.

http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html
From the web page:
Quote

It has often been seen on the Internet that to find God in the Constitution, all one has to do is read it, and see how often the Framers used the words "God," or "Creator," "Jesus," or "Lord." Except for one notable instance, however, none of these words ever appears in the Constitution, neither the original nor in any of the Amendments. The notable exception is found in the Signatory section, where the date is written thusly: "Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven". The use of the word "Lord" here is not a religious reference, however. This was a common way of expressing the date, in both religious and secular contexts. This lack of any these words does not mean that the Framers were not spiritual people, any more than the use of the word Lord means that they were. What this lack of these words is ex-positive of is not a love for or disdain for religion, but the feeling that the new government should not involve itself in matters of religion. In fact, the original Constitution bars any religious test to hold any federal office in the United States.



There was a reason that Jefferson and the Framers left religion out of the Constitution - religious persecution. One of the reasons many left Europe for America.
Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist put it in simple terms that any intelligent person could understand.

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

The slippery slope would to be a specific religion as law, thus condemning all other faiths.
"...And once you're gone, you can't come back
When you're out of the blue and into the black."
Neil Young

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I see where she's coming from. The Consitution recognizes the Government as being a God-given institution, and it was only the insertion of seditious language in the form of amendments that denied that obvious fact. Thus, we are now on the slippery slope to disaster.



You could not be any more wrong, even if you gave it an ounce of thought! You should take some time and learn what you do not know.



Gosh, how could I have been so thoroughly in error? I mean, if I was being facaetious I would have been legally required to include the appropriate emoticon to clue in the hard-of-thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I took your post to be serious. I apologize. Yet, there are many who do believe that our Constitution and God go hand in hand.



No problem.

If you look closely at the Constitution, it is obvious that the Flying Spaghetti Monster touched it with his Noodly Appendage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I took your post to be serious. I apologize. Yet, there are many who do believe that our Constitution and God go hand in hand.



No problem.

If you look closely at the Constitution, it is obvious that the Flying Spaghetti Monster touched it with his Noodly Appendage.


And all of the Amendments are meatballs!;)
"...And once you're gone, you can't come back
When you're out of the blue and into the black."
Neil Young

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So in other words - you don't like the obvious answer to the question, so your only recourse is to change the question to suit an answer that you think better suits what you want to believe in. Is that accurate?



You debate on a silly level. I'm just not willing to play your game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

So in other words - you don't like the obvious answer to the question, so your only recourse is to change the question to suit an answer that you think better suits what you want to believe in. Is that accurate?



You debate on a silly level. I'm just not willing to play your game.



Thank you for reittrating my point so well.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Nobody parades around spewing ignorance more than Christine O'Donnell. How stupid do you have to be to think that "Intelligent Design" and Creation are two different things, and to go and say that Evolution is "just a theory" and that it is not a scientific accepted fact. That alone is the most destructive thing she could have said in my eyes.

You also gotta love the little "where in the constitution is the separation of church and state???"

Give me a break GOP...



On another note

Please show me where separation of church and state are printed in the Constitution? I know where the congress shall write no law is but I am interested in your input

Also, I dont think anyone denies that speicies evolve and change but, taking it to the man from monkeys level is yet just a theory ?

I do know the media is having fun with this and you seem to be drinking the kool aid

Good place to leave this I guess



Are you really asking me where in the Constitution does it say that?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Make no law for ESTABLISHING a religion, therefore the government cannot establish a religion, in dumb plain English the church (religion) the state (government) shall not be together in other words once again, separate. I feel like I'm wasting my time even trying to water down something that is so easy to understand. That's like asking where in the 3 Little Pigs is there a reference to the wolf...

As for the topic of evolution, you clearly lack the very rudimentary understanding of evolution. No scientist has ever said we came from apes and we evolved from monkeys like you usually like to claim. We share a common ancestor with primates, I'm not going to argue the facts with you because evolution is an accepted scientific fact, it does not matter how much evidence we have for it (which there is a plethora) it is concrete.

Open a text book. Please.
B.A.S.E. #1734

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Which would you rather have in office, Alvin Greene or C. O'Donnell?



Six of one, half a dozen of the other. A moron by any other name....

I agree that either party is capable of coming up with a lowest-common-denominator candidate, and that either of these people are at the low end of the short-bus population.

To argue for either of them is like discussing whether horse or mule droppings are "superior" - anyone who is willing to go for a taste test is free to do so, but I will take it on faith that they are interchangeable.

Mediocrity has no political affiliation (though saying that either of these candidates is merely "mediocre" is giving them unwarrented credit).


BSBD,

Winsor



There IS a party in which O'Donnell and her supporters would be right at home.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0