skipbelt 0 #51 October 24, 2010 how nutty obuma is , so much to choose from like did you read the part about he's paranoid about being poisoned ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #52 October 24, 2010 Quotehow nutty obuma is , so much to choose from like did you read the part about he's paranoid about being poisoned ? That's a legitimate concern for any head of state, but my guess is that's less of his concern than it is of the Secret Service. In other words, my guess is that he's not paranoid to eat anything that's been OKed by them and they check the food the same for Obama as they have for every President.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #53 October 24, 2010 QuoteQuotehow nutty obuma is , so much to choose from like did you read the part about he's paranoid about being poisoned ? Gee President Bush brought "food tasters" to Buckingham palace due to security concerns. One could say what an insult to one of our closest allies, but a a president has to be careful and no one went on a rant about that. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/columnists/article-228724/Bush-brings-food-taster-Palace.html Was Bush paranoid? Due you really fly corporate aircraft? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #54 October 24, 2010 I'd bet that it's SOP to have food safety checks whenever any US pres dines out. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #55 October 24, 2010 QuoteI'd bet that it's SOP to have food safety checks whenever any US pres dines out. People who think that is nuts ... do not have a firm grasp of the history of civilization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_poison Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #56 October 24, 2010 not food safety checks , his own chefs . surely they aren't safety risks !back to topic CC has vested interest...http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/22/odonnell-coonss-senate-votes-could-bring-family-billions/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 220 #57 October 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteThe Dems have no problem with the well-thought-out, carefully scripted lies of Dem party candidates. We all remember the Hillary campaign, don't we? How embarrassing was that? Considering the "carefully scripted lies" of the 43rd Administration, do you really want to go down that road? I don't think the vast majority of voters want leadership via lies. That was a couple of years ago - you might want to adress current topics here. Bush can not become president again - why are you so obsessed with him?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #58 October 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteThe Dems have no problem with the well-thought-out, carefully scripted lies of Dem party candidates. We all remember the Hillary campaign, don't we? How embarrassing was that? Considering the "carefully scripted lies" of the 43rd Administration, do you really want to go down that road? I don't think the vast majority of voters want leadership via lies. That was a couple of years ago - you might want to adress current topics here. Bush can not become president again - why are you so obsessed with him? Because there is nothing they want to point to that they have acomplished the last two years"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
happythoughts 0 #59 October 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteThe Dems have no problem with the well-thought-out, carefully scripted lies of Dem party candidates. We all remember the Hillary campaign, don't we? How embarrassing was that? Considering the "carefully scripted lies" of the 43rd Administration, do you really want to go down that road? I don't think the vast majority of voters want leadership via lies. So, you are against lying? Definitely? In fact, if someone was discovered to have delivered deliberate falsehoods before the election, you would not vote for them? Most Dems won't state that. That was my point. They seem to be ok with knowingly voting for candidates who have been proven to make up stuff before the election. Goofy as CO's opinions are, nobody would make that up. Her opinions are out there, but they are hers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #60 October 26, 2010 >Most Dems won't state that. That was my point. >They seem to be ok with knowingly voting for >candidates who have been proven to make up stuff before the election. A characteristic of both parties, actually. Lying is sort of required when you're a politician, sadly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #61 October 26, 2010 yes i due maybe besides obuma the wrong nutty politician is being crucified... http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/10/marxist-coons-butchers-first-amendment-in-debate-state-run-media-puts-blame-on-christine-odonnell-video/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #62 October 26, 2010 Quoteyes i due maybe besides obuma the wrong nutty politician is being crucified... http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/10/marxist-coons-butchers-first-amendment-in-debate-state-run-media-puts-blame-on-christine-odonnell-video/ Since nobody's going to click on your link, and the rest of your post makes no sense, why not tell us coherently what's on your mind? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
