wmw999 2,452 #26 October 26, 2010 You're absolutely right -- Kennedy's are absolutely great. You post content as a rule as well (although you were wrong about Obama cutting NASA's budget ). And I'm sure there are others as well they just haven't posted in the last day or two, and I'm a blonde Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prior23 0 #27 October 26, 2010 Yeah Conservatives are all about intellect. Let's teach intelligent design in the science class room!!! B.A.S.E. #1734 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #28 October 26, 2010 QuoteQuoterhaig, davinci, lawrocket, gawain (who hasn't been here recently unfortunately) all probably qualify as conservative. kennedy's posts are usually good to go. But, yeah, I can't stand one-liner OPs. You prefer run on rambling OP'? instead of just making a point? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #29 October 26, 2010 Quote You prefer run on rambling OP'? instead of just making a point? A well written argument of any length is a joy to read even if I don't agree with it. On the other hand, incoherent posts are painful no matter how brief. Brevity may be the soul of wit, but even at that it's better to be understood and actually have something to say than just bark nonsensical pot shots.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #30 October 26, 2010 libs are often exceedingly condescending , and very anger prone , there are no incoherent posts , just incoherent readers ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #31 October 26, 2010 Quotegenerally libs are more emotional , and cons more intellect driven. Quotelibs are often exceedingly condescending... Well, on the bright side you've downgraded from "generally" to "often" in your blanket statements. Telling people they're being emotional in a discussion, however, could be construed as condescending which makes this pair of statements kinda funny. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #32 October 26, 2010 QuoteTelling people they're being emotional in a discussion, however, could be construed as condescending .... which might actually make them emotional even if they weren't much like telling someone to 'calm down' might just have the opposite effect also. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #33 October 26, 2010 Quotelibs are often exceedingly condescending , and very anger prone , there are no incoherent posts , just incoherent readers ! Is it condescending to point out that your post is incoherent? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #34 October 26, 2010 QuoteQuotelibs are often exceedingly condescending , and very anger prone , there are no incoherent posts , just incoherent readers ! Is it condescending to point out that your post is incoherent? Makes perfect sense to me Must be a liberal thing for you"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,452 #35 October 26, 2010 Whether or not posters are incoherent (you have to read some of the drunk posts in Bonfire before announcing there's no such thing ), there are times when it's really hard to tell what a poster means with what he or she writes. Sometimes by going back through the thread you can figure it out, but if I can't figure it out reasonably quickly I'll give up. I do this for fun, there's no need to go post necromancing to figure out wtf someone was saying if there's no content or new idea there. And it's usually easy to see if there's a new idea. Less than one full line is often a good indicator that there isn't a whole lot of actual content. Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #36 October 26, 2010 generally one must be repetitive with libs, especially if it's true and offends lib sensibilities ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #37 October 26, 2010 QuoteLess than one full line is often a good indicator that there isn't a whole lot of actual content. Yup. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,452 #38 October 26, 2010 Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prior23 0 #39 October 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteLess than one full line is often a good indicator that there isn't a whole lot of actual content. Yup. +2 It tends to be a very recurring theme, and it's always more on one side of the board than another.B.A.S.E. #1734 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #40 October 26, 2010 Quoterhaig, davinci, lawrocket, gawain (who hasn't been here recently unfortunately) all probably qualify as conservative. I am finding myself to become increasingly embittered by labeling. Sure, I do it myself, so it makes me a bit hypocritical. But identifying as conservative is something I don't do. I think that the particular identifications can come from what people perceive to be their biggest issue. For example, if one views anticollectivism to be the most impotant attribute of a conservative then I'd be conservative. On the other hand if one views personal freedoms, the 4th Amendment, equal protection, etc., as the most important qualifier then I'd be a liberal because I oppose discrimination against gays, by race, and believe that the 4th Amendment means what it says. Labels of "conservative" or "liberal" are usually meant to classify someone and never look at details. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #41 October 26, 2010 Quoteidentifying as conservative is something I don't do. Oh, well. It beats "scum-sucking lawyer" in a close race. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #42 October 26, 2010 libs are very often more frequent practicioners of the behaviors they whine the most about ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #43 October 27, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote With all the liberal-bashing circle-jerk going on here, ya wanna remind me again about all the nasty censorship that goes on of conservatives, how unfair all the liberal moderators are, and how immature liberals are? Wendy P. Pull up any of Amazon's posts . . . Aww poor wittle Turtle.... Hmm I wonder if I should get a logon over at nedtheneedledick.com to watch the right wing cirlejerks there too Mostly lib's and halfwits have taken over "speak your mind" forum , you'd be right at home! Its never fun to deal with guys like so many here who NEVER bring even that to a battle of wits. I miss the old days with Vinny the Anvil who brought a brain and not the head full of mush that so many self identified "conservatives" bring daily with incessant posts about what boogiemen are hiding under the bed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #44 October 27, 2010 libs often assert how superior they are ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #45 October 27, 2010 QuoteQuote You prefer run on rambling OP'? instead of just making a point? A well written argument of any length is a joy to read even if I don't agree with it. On the other hand, incoherent posts are painful no matter how brief. Brevity may be the soul of wit, but even at that it's better to be understood and actually have something to say than just bark nonsensical pot shots. This issue is that anything that you read that varies with your POV is rambling, biased, drivel. Anything you do agree with is ignored or at best used to belittle someone that you disagree with.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #46 October 27, 2010 Quote Quote libs are often exceedingly condescending , and very anger prone , there are no incoherent posts , just incoherent readers ! Is it condescending to point out that your post is incoherent? You couldn't understand it? I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #47 October 27, 2010 Quote Its never fun to deal with guys like so many here who NEVER bring even that to a battle of wits. Oh, but it is fun. Don't kid yourself. I derive great pleasure from dealing with liberals and their mind set. It's like watching AFHV. I have better things to do, but you have to engage in pointless entertainment every now and again. Hell, even your buddy Obama plays golf.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #48 October 27, 2010 Quotelibs often assert how superior they are ! Conservatards seem to get seriously butthurt feeling so inferior all the time. Perhaps they need to go back to community college and take a few psych classes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #49 October 27, 2010 Quote Quote Its never fun to deal with guys like so many here who NEVER bring even that to a battle of wits. Oh, but it is fun. Don't kid yourself. I derive great pleasure from dealing with liberals and their mind set. It's like watching AFHV. I have better things to do, but you have to engage in pointless entertainment every now and again. Hell, even your buddy Obama plays golf. Very well done Clint, you get brownie points for being able to spell the Presidents name. Well done little reptile Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #50 October 27, 2010 Quote"scum-sucking lawyer" Redundant. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
