skipbelt 0 #76 November 2, 2010 if i could get the whole forum to say you're right , would you stop ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #77 November 2, 2010 QuoteThe referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere. http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/...9-00017-Valentim.pdf The problem with that theroy, is that there are photographs of these microsperes fused to the red grey chips as seen in this picture (attached)"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,563 #78 November 2, 2010 Quotenext the projectile, they use wooden boards to represent the pentagon and scale it dowm significantly but they do not scale down the speed of the projectile... convenient. that experiment was very humerous but had no scientific merit. much like myth busters. Jenga. Quotehaha a wooden pentagon, haha, seriously. Haha, wooden Jenga!Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 569 #79 November 2, 2010 Quote This substance may well have been painted on the steel, but generally iron oxide is not good for anti corrosion on steel and alumino thermitic coctails are not good for fire protection. Iron oxide is rust I am not surprised to find iron oxide on metal beams in a 40 year old building. I must admit I despair, you have selected the most convoluted and complicated rational and ignore any suggestion of alternative explanations. To be 100% honest with you I simply can't accept that a conspiracy or cover up could happen on the scale you are proposing. As a result I am not all that interested in spending lots of time researching but I am simply giving you the most obvious explanations. Let us not forget that 9/11 in New York was THE most video'd and photographed attack/catastrophe in history. Add to this the fact that Manhattan is highly populated and the odds of slipping something past everyone is minuscule.Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 569 #80 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote next the projectile, they use wooden boards to represent the pentagon and scale it dowm significantly but they do not scale down the speed of the projectile... convenient. that experiment was very humerous but had no scientific merit. much like myth busters. Jenga. Quote haha a wooden pentagon, haha, seriously. Haha, wooden Jenga! Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #81 November 2, 2010 QuoteJenga. haha, i mention a stack of jenga as a good indication of the path of gtreatest resistance. and you think I compare jenga to the wtc buildings. The someone posts a videpo af a giant stak a wood blocks falling 'over' and you applaude. You are about the poster not the subject and that is why I, for the most part, ignore your comments. You are like amazon, you just want attention and give nothing to a conversation. sad."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #82 November 2, 2010 QuoteIron oxide is rustUnsure I am not surprised to find iron oxide on metal beams in a 40 year old building. scratched record.... Quote * gray layer: a hard homogeneous ceramic composition: iron and oxygen * red layer: an engineered nano-composite substance, comprising: o matrix: a nano-structured semi-transparent porous material composition: silicon, oxygen, and carbon o particles: homogeneously embedded in the matrix and consisting of: + thin predominantly hexagonal plates dimensions: ~40nm thickness, ~1000nm diameter composition: mostly aluminum, with small amounts of carbon and oxygen + rhombic faceted grains dimensions: ~100nm diameter composition: mostly iron and oxygen, probably as Fe2O3, with small amounts of silicon, sulfur, and carbon "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #83 November 2, 2010 Fe2O3 Ferric Oxide Rust HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kaustik 3 #84 November 2, 2010 Preaching to us lazy 'mericans over the interwebs is going to bring you nothing but headaches man. Direct action > wordsThe future belongs to those of us still willing to get our hands dirty. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
futuredivot 0 #85 November 2, 2010 QuotePlease avoid moving the subect matter away from the subject Your Honor, it speaks to the credibility of the witness.You are only as strong as the prey you devour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,075 #86 November 2, 2010 You did not attach a picture. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #87 November 2, 2010 QuoteAre you really that ignorant? Or are you blind to things that do not fit with your belief system. I was going to ask you that same question. Put a link to this thread on the web page of the dropzone that you supposedly own and identify yourself so all your customer know who you are. That would be funny. Or would you be afraid you may alienate rational people from coming to your dropzone? ________________________________ "1981 to 1988 is 7 years"-Kallend (oops, it's actually 8 years Kallend) The decade of the 80's was from 1980 to 1989. 10 years. If you remove 1980 and 1989 you have 1981 to 1988. 8 years. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #88 November 2, 2010 Quotepeople of your ilk, Classy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,563 #89 November 2, 2010 Quotehaha, i mention a stack of jenga as a good indication of the path of gtreatest resistance. and you think I compare jenga to the wtc buildings. You did. If you think the path of least resistance in a normal stack of Jenga blocks has absolutely anything whatsoever to do with the path of least resistance in the WTC towers, you did. If you don't think that, then posting it was just another one of the pathetic lies you propogate in order to try and draw attention away from what really happened before, during and after 9/11. Rhys: Lying for Bush! QuoteYou are about the poster not the subject and that is why I, for the most part, ignore your comments. No you don't, you reply to most of them! It is impossible to have a conversation with you about the subject: Every single person in this thread who has tried to have a conversation with you about the subject has been fobbed of with cries of "strawman!" and "ignorence!"[sic]. When it comes to this subject you're a rude, aggressive and closed-minded broken record. It's a real shame.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,075 #90 November 2, 2010 Your one warning. Cut it out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 855 #91 November 2, 2010 Interesting. I had assumed he had, in fact, attached a picture. Then realized that the conspiracy had secretly removed it. They ARE monitoring all communications after all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #92 November 2, 2010 What did he say that wasn't true?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,075 #93 November 2, 2010 >What did he say that wasn't true? No personal attacks. I don't care if you think they are true. (If someone called you an idiot, it would still be a personal attack even if they felt they could prove it.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #94 November 2, 2010 QuoteEeeeer, I would have thought the discovery if highly engineerd incendiaries, the residue they produce and in abundence in the rubble would be exactly that. This entire thread fits the desciption of your request. but you chose to ignore it like everybody else that is up to thier eyeballs in guilt for not seeing reason earlier, and are responsable for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people. These murders are also ommited from the daily news and, replaced by drug addicted crack whore actresses doing stupid things to keep you all entertained while crimes of vast proportions are carried out with your name on them. You are the one assuming things. You assume they are highly engineered but can't say why you think that other than their unifrom size. I've asked for proof that they were highly engineered and alerted you to the fact that there are plenty of things in nature that are uniform in size with only natural processes as the input. So explain why you think they are highly engineered. If your only evidence is their uniform size, then you have proven nothing. Your constant straying from the topic and the manner in which you do so is very bizarre. Up to my eyeballs in guilt? On the events of 911? Responsible for the deaths that occurred? Entertained by news of crack whore actresses, . . . me? Crimes of vast proportions being carried out with my name on them? Really? Yowza." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #95 November 2, 2010 Quote>What did he say that wasn't true? No personal attacks. I don't care if you think they are true. (If someone called you an idiot, it would still be a personal attack even if they felt they could prove it.) I read it all again - I'm just missing the point. Is it because he said he was close minded?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #96 November 2, 2010 Quotei don't feeel the need to come and disturb your discussions with irrelevant points. So I suggest you stick to the suject matter or simply go away and tru to find someone that has the time for you. But you like to shit stir, Quote Irrelevant points and shit stirring, heh? You mean like bringing in the topics of crack whores, claiming vast crimes being committed in my name, stuff like that? Yeah, everybody better stop doing that to you huh? And you accusing others of bizarre behavior?" . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #97 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuote>What did he say that wasn't true? No personal attacks. I don't care if you think they are true. (If someone called you an idiot, it would still be a personal attack even if they felt they could prove it.) I read it all again - I'm just missing the point. Is it because he said he was close minded? Since Rhys has already been warned for (among many PAs), posting a picture of Belgium Draft as a straw man (the kiwi has a massive obsession, and complete misunderstanding of the term), the standards tighten. But on a relative scale, it was tit for TAT. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pirana 0 #98 November 2, 2010 Quoteyou mates at national geogrpahic ignore knowledge they already know, just as NIST know. Everybody ought to knon that National Geographic is also in on the conspiracy." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skipbelt 0 #99 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuotepeople of your ilk,Classy.ironic Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #100 November 2, 2010 Quote >What did he say that wasn't true? No personal attacks. I don't care if you think they are true. (If someone called you an idiot, it would still be a personal attack even if they felt they could prove it.) But But But..... BILLLLLL We have met ClintSEVERAL times Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Page 4 of 13 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kelpdiver 2 #97 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuote>What did he say that wasn't true? No personal attacks. I don't care if you think they are true. (If someone called you an idiot, it would still be a personal attack even if they felt they could prove it.) I read it all again - I'm just missing the point. Is it because he said he was close minded? Since Rhys has already been warned for (among many PAs), posting a picture of Belgium Draft as a straw man (the kiwi has a massive obsession, and complete misunderstanding of the term), the standards tighten. But on a relative scale, it was tit for TAT. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #98 November 2, 2010 Quoteyou mates at national geogrpahic ignore knowledge they already know, just as NIST know. Everybody ought to knon that National Geographic is also in on the conspiracy." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #99 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuotepeople of your ilk,Classy.ironic Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #100 November 2, 2010 Quote >What did he say that wasn't true? No personal attacks. I don't care if you think they are true. (If someone called you an idiot, it would still be a personal attack even if they felt they could prove it.) But But But..... BILLLLLL We have met ClintSEVERAL times Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites