Nanothermite paper, if you think it is bull shit then show us your evidence

[Kennedy 0]

Why do you keep posting this 9-11 conspiracy stuff?

Do you think you've convinced someone?

Do you really like being thrashed soundly in debates?

Do you realize you're being thrashed soundly in these "debates"?

Do you realize that you are proving everyone else's notions of how conspiracy theorists act? (loony)

Aren't there places you can discuss this stuff where you won't be rejected out of hand by 99% of readers?

witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

[jakee 1,564]

Quote

I was taking the subject mater back from the schoolyard name calling and ego building excersizes to the subject at hand.

Were you. Really?

Post 1 of the thread. By you. "if you think those highly energetic material is paint or some resude from the collapse then you are an idiot! "

Post 300 of the thread. By you. "What a fucking joke, you are all hot air and no substance... pure arrogance and ignorence[sic]... It is about time you bacme more specific, les ambiguous, arrogant and ignorant... It is about time you grew up a little and showed us the skills of engineering you supposedly have."


Hmm. Seems like schoolyard name calling and ego building was what this thread was always meant to be about












PS, "[sic]" means you're STILL spelling it wrong. Seeing as it's your new favourite word for the month you could at least have done that much research.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Once again you erode valuable bandwidth by copying an entire post.

-Yeah, right....like you don't engage in name-calling.

-I gave you sevral examples of you contradicting yourself. #1 way is relying on government data when it supports your assertions but ignoring it or insinuating it is made up when it doesn't.

Your paper has been shown to be BS.

-Yes, it renders the entire report useless since there is absolutely no way to reproduce the testing with any sort of confience in the acurracy of the results. Another person could not answer the simplest question, "Am i working with a similar sample?" Unknown in= unknown out.

-Bill has addressed the issue correctly, just not to your liking.

-I have not spent one second searching for a peer reviewed paper to disprove yours. It is not needed. You need to prove yours to be factual. I do not need to prove it to be false. Thus far you have failed.

-I have given you examples of where to find thermite residue, both reacted an unreacted, in several situations including burned out buildings, dirt, etc. You chose to ignore them like everything else.

-One example of an independent study. http://www.cs.purdue.edu/news/6-15-07WTC.htm

-God sent down masses of invisible flying monkeys with laser-emmiting bananas to cut the columns. That is why the WTC fell. Don't believe me? Prove me wrong. ( It makes more sense than any theory you have put up.)

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[rhys 0]

Quote

Prove to me you're not crazy.

You can't - in general it's extremely difficult to disprove a negative. That's why the burden of proof is on you, not us.

look if you really do not want to participate in this converstaion you do not need to.

It is quite clear that you, elgie, bill and all the other imbeciles here that have said time and time again that you think this is a silly conversation, yet you are always replying.

I know that is becasue deep down, or maybe even near the surface, you know you are kidding yourself, you know the world is corrupt, you know human beings are not to be trusted when money and power are at hand but you know you have the backing from very powerful entities that are producing this specific dogmatic lunacy. so you stick with it.

Truth i in the too hrd pile for you, becasue you and your mates here are still yet to address the very principal of this thread, just the usual school yard tactics..

childish.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

[billvon 3,076]

Your last warning.

[jakee 1,564]

Quote

just the usual school yard tactics..


It is quite clear that you, elgie, bill and all the other imbeciles

Can you not hear yourself?

Are you actually unaware of the things you are typing not 30 seconds apart from each other?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rhys 0]

Quote

Post 1 of the thread. By you. "if you think those highly energetic material is paint or some resude from the collapse then you are an idiot! "

Quote

id·i·ot
 
–noun
1.
an utterly foolish or senseless person.

I could have written utterly foolish person but it takes more energy. idiots are not limited to children.

Quote

Post 300 of the thread. By you. "What a fucking joke, you are all hot air and no substance... pure arrogance and ignorence[sic]... It is about time you bacme more specific, les ambiguous, arrogant and ignorant... It is about time you grew up a little and showed us the skills of engineering you supposedly have."

well after many posts and no attempt to substanciate the claims made by this person it is easy to conclude that they are simply full of hot air, if you read the title of the thread, you will see that it asks for evidence, and you will find thaat the said person keeps making unsubtanciated claimes with no evidence.

It does not mater may many time you say I am wrong, you are just making accustions until yu prove it.

Quote

Hmm. Seems like schoolyard name calling and ego building was what this thread was always meant to be about

Not it was meant to highlight at the claims of the wankers here that continue to try to discredit my integrety and evidence without showing an ounce if it themselves are simply full of shit.

No one has even made an attempt to debunk the fundamentals of the nano thermite paper, thay cannot because it is written concisely with the evidence to back upthe conclusions.

evidence is evidence.

you lot don't have any, you have propoganda and lies.

That is all. Now put p or shut up.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

you know the world is corrupt, you know human beings are not to be trusted when money and power are at hand

You are absolutely 100% correct and I don't think many, if any, here will challenge you on that.

But that doesn't mean we will believe a theory made up of half-truths and bad science when we and others can and have disproven every single aspect of those theories time and again.
Distrust of government is one thing.
Agreeing with crackpots is something else entirely.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

Your last warning.

how many last warnings does he get?

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

Quote

Prove to me you're not crazy.

You can't - in general it's extremely difficult to disprove a negative. That's why the burden of proof is on you, not us.

look if you really do not want to participate in this converstaion you do not need to.

It is quite clear that you, elgie, bill and all the other imbeciles here that have said time and time again that you think this is a silly conversation, yet you are always replying.

I know that is becasue deep down, or maybe even near the surface, you know you are kidding yourself, you know the world is corrupt,

again, I ask you to prove to us that you're not crazy.

That's really no different than the topic's subject: "prove that my web published, "peer" reviewed paper isn't bullshit.

But we already know it's crazy to expect to convince you otherwise, no matter how much evidence or logic might be presented to you.

[jakee 1,564]

Quote

Not it was meant to highlight at the claims of the wankers here that continue to try to discredit my integrety and evidence without showing an ounce if it themselves are simply full of shit.

You are absolutely the least self aware person i have ever talked to. I am convinced that you don't even realise what it is that you are typing.

Come on, defending against the charge of schoolyard namecalling by stating that you started this thread to show that everyone who disagrees with you is a wanker?

Is 'Irony' what you do to clothes after you've washed them?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rhys 0]

Quote

Why do you keep posting this 9-11 conspiracy stuff?

Because if I am incorrect I want to know. The more I post and the more you lot that say you don't care for the subject yet continue to exert energy trying to discredit rather than disprove the subject, the more sure I can be that my assertions are in fact correct.

Quote

Do you think you've convinced someone?

yes, myself. There are many outspoken post wores here, that feel the need to reply to every thread whether or not they can conribute to the discussion or not, and there are plenty that just read and neve make a comment, Just because you see the usual types make the same deluded and childish comments, the ones you don;t see, most likely don;t post to avoid the very insults that I expect from you lot.

I could care less about some war monging, violent right wing cunts that only want the pain and suffering of innocent civilians for the sake of cheap energy, products and recources.

You lot ignore this pain and suffering, I am aware of it.

For instance, i know you support the ight wing, you ignore the prevailent truth of 9/11 you feel the wars are justified, so you have blood on your hands. deep down you know the truth, but you are not willing to admit it, and thise little stabs I get in the form of name calling are signs of this uncertainty coming out.

if you were so certain, you would just ;leave me to post alone in my threads.

Bill for example has said a number of time he is no longer dicussing the subject, but he continues to do so and he knows his intrgety is at stake if he does not help prop up the lies.

With his support comes the suppoert of the other sheep.

without bill and belg. and the few that acyually make an attemt to address some fringe point to detract from the core of the subject, your argument would be simple name calling while mine is scientific evidence produces from industry professionals.

Quote

Do you really like being thrashed soundly in debates?

example please.....?

Quote

Do you realize that you are proving everyone else's notions of how conspiracy theorists act? (loony)

No, i realise that those that can just make the conspiracy nut call without substaanciating thier claims are simple minds that have no integrety. If they had integrey they would ask themselves what evidence do I have that this theory is wrong, submit that evidnce and the debate would be won.

Quote

Aren't there places you can discuss this stuff where you won't be rejected out of hand by 99% of readers?

yes there is, I discuss with them the evidence that comes to be on a daily basis, then I post here for scrutiny.

I expect the usual names and insults from childish idiots, but also the hashest scrutiny from those the violently defent the official dogma as they have pushed all in, and bet their interety on the propoganda and lies of very powerful people.

That attitude is very similar to that of many americans that seem to act like america has always been the mopst poerful nation on earth and will always be so.

Just a couple of factors can change anything, america is slowly losing its hold on the worlds affairs and so is are the people that created this debarcle.

You and you mates however will defend it to the death, while the previously apatheric will see the increasing desparate and defensive measures of your weak and pathetic attemt to hide the truth.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

[jakee 1,564]

Quote

I expect the usual names and insults from childish idiots,

Yep. You!

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

Because if I am incorrect I want to know. The more I post and the more you lot that say you don't care for the subject yet continue to exert energy trying to discredit rather than disprove the subject, the more sure I can be that my assertions are in fact correct.

That makes no sense at all. No shit, rhys, it doesn't.
Here's something you can try to prove to yourself i am right on this. Start hitting your hand with a hammer. Hit it HARD! And keep doing it while telling yourself it doesn't hurt. And everytime you say it doesn't hurt, hit it again only even harder. Then, when your hand is all a bloody pulp and it still hurts, dip it in a bucket of jabanero juice. But remember to keep telling yourself the more it hurts the more you are convinced it doesn't.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[billvon 3,076]

Enough.

Yes, Rhys is attacking people. But that does not give anyone the right to attack back, and that includes "tinfoil hat" comments, comments like "crackpot" "crazy" "least self aware person" "paranoid" "irrational" etc. Those are just as personal; consider this a warning for the future. (Everyone, not just BelgianDraft.)