pirana 0 #51 November 1, 2010 QuoteUNIFORM and very very small, meaning they were costructed with advance technology. Try again.Quote Wrong. There are lots of things that are uniform and very small that are not the result of application of technology. There are natural processes that result in things uniform and very small. (Hint: think asteroid impact)." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,501 #52 November 1, 2010 Quote UNIFORM paticles 100 Nano metres across. UNIFORM and very very small, meaning they were costructed with advance technology. Advanced technology? There were ALIENS involved?Why have we not heard about this before? WHAT ELSE IS BEING COVERED UP??!!!11??!!Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jakee 1,501 #53 November 1, 2010 Quoteneither arguments are acknowledging that Nanothermite is only produced by dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process. Who here would like to see Rhys describe dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process in his own words? I would, I think it'd be awesome. Shall we have a poll?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skipbelt 0 #54 November 1, 2010 my favorite martian , uncle martin ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,009 #55 November 1, 2010 Your one warning. Cut it out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhys 0 #56 November 1, 2010 Quote The burden of proof is on you to show that the findings are not in line with a jetliner crashing into the building. The burden is not on other people to disprove your wildly fantastic, incredible, unbelievable screwball CT's. Eeeeer, I would have thought the discovery if highly engineerd incendiaries, the residue they produce and in abundence in the rubble would be exactly that. You are ignoring that fact. Quote You have yet to provide a shred of evidence that can not be accounted for by the officially accepted description of the events. Are you really that ignorant? Or are you blind to things that do not fit with your belief system. This entire thread fits the desciption of your request. but you chose to ignore it like everybody else that is up to thier eyeballs in guilt for not seeing reason earlier, and are responsable for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people. These murders are also ommited from the daily news and, replaced by drug addicted crack whore actresses doing stupid things to keep you all entertained while crimes of vast proportions are carried out with your name on them. Ignorence is bliss, but you have the blood of many peoples lives on your hands by ignoring tangible evidence. your call. I'll keep my integrety while you stick you your straw man arguments, ignoring facts (and the entire thread) and defending corrupt criminals that could care less about you."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhys 0 #57 November 1, 2010 Quote Your one warning. Cut it out. Explain so I do not repeat please."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #58 November 1, 2010 Where in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites tkhayes 348 #59 November 1, 2010 OH C'MON!! Everyone knows that God did it..... http://www.september11news.com/Mysteries1.htm His face was everywhere during the crisis OBVIOUSLY!! Quit your rubbish - only MY link shows the real truth!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skipbelt 0 #60 November 1, 2010 QuoteWhere in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens.have you not been following my discussion of the historical developmentment of nanothermite paper ? my next update was going to cover the development you mention . thanks for ruining it. it involved a thoroughbred horse with champion bloodlines. it would always come in dead last. the announcers LOVED this horse . wanna know why ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites shermanator 4 #61 November 2, 2010 rhys, I'm watching national geo right now,` and your show is on!CLICK HERE! new blog posted 9/21/08 CSA #720 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhys 0 #62 November 2, 2010 what the one about talking snakes, immaculate conception, imaginary friends and people that talk to themself before bed to ensure a lif in a supposed wonderland after death? Oh that is your progrm. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhys 0 #63 November 2, 2010 QuoteWhere in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens. Once again a pathetic post related to nothing and with no meaning. At least you are consistent. Ignoring the facts and using strawman techniques"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #64 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote Where in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens. Once again a pathetic post related to nothing and with no meaning. At least you are consistent. Ignoring the facts and using strawman techniques DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE Unclench already Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Belgian_Draft 0 #65 November 2, 2010 -Depends on your definition of uniform and what tolerence you allow for variance. It is completely subjective. -It only seems unlikely because you do not understand how it can happen. Go take some chem classes at your local university. -Tha samples are questionable because there is no documentation to show they were collected as claimed. Just because some guy says he collected a sample from his laundry room next a a window doesn't mean he actually did. For all we know these suppliers of the samples could be buddies of yours who conspired to supply real dust samples they later contaminated to intentionally decieve the public. That is far more likely than anything you have suggested. -Being that these men have associated themselves with crackpots I hesitate to acknowledge anything they write. -Nice picture. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wolfriverjoe 1,523 #66 November 2, 2010 No, the one where real scientists and engineers take on the truthers. http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/9-11-science-and-conspiracy-4067/conspiracy-vs-science But it's all part of the conspiracy to cover it up."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Belgian_Draft 0 #67 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteneither arguments are acknowledging that Nanothermite is only produced by dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process. Who here would like to see Rhys describe dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process in his own words? I would, I think it'd be awesome. Shall we have a poll? Aye! But we all know he won't because he doesn't know a thing about the technology.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhys 0 #68 November 2, 2010 QuoteDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE Unclench alreadySly Once again, I am anything but uptight about this. i don't feeel the need to come and disturb your discussions with irrelevant points. So I suggest you stick to the suject matter or simply go away and tru to find someone that has the time for you. But you like to shit stir, and now Bill has given me a warning, it is obvious you are trying to provoke me into some sort reaction. You are wasting your time woman. I'm a cool as a cucumber and nobody has had anything but straw man arguments in this thead as the paper you ridicule is not refutable, uness one actually looks at the evidence themselves. Straw man arguments are not real arguments. They are megre attempts of those that use them to keep their integrety. The integrety they have pushed all in on the very people they spend the rest of the time trying to say are lyers in threads on other subjects? bizzare!"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skipbelt 0 #69 November 2, 2010 what about my thoroughbred ? it's a conspiracy ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Belgian_Draft 0 #70 November 2, 2010 Quote the paper you ridicule is not refutable, uness one actually looks at the evidence themselves The way in which the evidence was collected means the entire paper means absolutely nothing relating to the WTC. The substances studied are not anything unusual. You have been challenged repeatedly to give YOUR explanations, yet you always and still evade doing so. Here's your chance! Time to put up! HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,009 #71 November 2, 2010 >The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in >the dust samples) The referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere. http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/papers/2009/CCGP-D-09-00017-Valentim.pdf >NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, >yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away >from the complex. There is a coal fired power plant less than 50 miles from New York City. It has been operating for over 40 years. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skipbelt 0 #72 November 2, 2010 Quote>The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in >the dust samples)The referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere.http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/papers/2009/CCGP-D-09-00017-Valentim.pdf>NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, >yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away >from the complex. There is a coal fired power plant less than 50 miles from New York City. It has been operating for over 40 years.very seldom do i enjoy your posts , this one is very refreshing . thank you. it should be just the thing to stop the insanity . somehow intuition says otherwise ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #73 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote >The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in >the dust samples) The referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere. http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/papers/2009/CCGP-D-09-00017-Valentim.pdf >NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, >yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away >from the complex. There is a coal fired power plant less than 50 miles from New York City. It has been operating for over 40 years. very seldom do i enjoy your posts , this one is very refreshing . thank you. it should be just the thing to stop the insanity . somehow intuition says otherwise ! OMFG we agreed twice in one day.... Quick everyone check to make sure that the holier than thou's are all still here and have not been miracled out of here for the RAPTURE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skipbelt 0 #74 November 2, 2010 must be our women's intuition x_o Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhys 0 #75 November 2, 2010 QuoteNo, the one where real scientists and engineers take on the truthers. http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/...onspiracy-vs-science But it's all part of the conspiracy to cover it up. Once again straw man techniques; QuoteConspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers. Science: Some Truthers claim that pulverized dust found by some New Yorkers after the attack contained the chemical signature of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes. EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center. Read more: http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/9-11-science-and-conspiracy-4067/conspiracy-vs-science#ixzz145OoTvLG you mates at national geogrpahic ignore knowledge they already know, just as NIST know. There is a wealth of information on thermite used ofr demolition.a couple of examples; http://www.patentstorm.us/search.html?q=thermite+demolition&s.x=0&s.y=0&s=s http://www.freepatentsonline.com /7555986.html haha, Just watched the Nat Geo, presentation. These straw man tactics issued but the companies ownd by PNAC signatories are pathetic. Comparing commercial grade thermite to nano thermite is like comparing diesel to aviation gas. these straw man techniques may work on you, but they are far from conclusive. and the assertin that the twin towers are the most controversial aspect of the events is also a blatant lie. The lack of exposure of Building 7 by the MSM is the most contrvertial, lets see if bulding 7 is mentioned anywhere in that presentation... oh it made a cameo, for few seconds. lets look at the pseudo science used in that presentation. the thermite used in their experient was similar to that used in sparklers, sparklers have metal sticks that the product is bound to and it does not melt. The thermitic red chips the paper is about clearly point ou the nano sizes particles, and the use of sulpher to lower the tmperature needed to melt the steel. That expriment is like comparing a fire cracker to dynamite. The fire cracker does not blow up the letterbox so dynamit would not either. Stupid. next the projectile, they use wooden boards to represent the pentagon and scale it dowm significantly but they do not scale down the speed of the projectile... convenient. that experiment was very humerous but had no scientific merit. much like myth busters. now placing a steel i beam a fraction of the size of those found in the wtc, in an ope air environment, with absolutely no heat sink also is a mis representation of the fires withing the WTC complex. If you don't kow what a heat sink is then you should learn. NONE of those experiemts represented what happened on 9/11, and none of them took into consideration the difference between nano thermite and ordinary thermite. The controlled demolition team had no experience with thermite (leat alone nano thermite) and they were looking for similarities in their demolition when there was nothing in common with the way they set up. The reasoning of that production was not to prove anything by experiment, it was meant to discredit richard gage, DRG and Dylan to people of your ilk, as anyone that understands scuence would realise how flawed those experiments ALL were. haha a wooden pentagon, haha, seriously."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page 3 of 13 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
jakee 1,501 #52 November 1, 2010 Quote UNIFORM paticles 100 Nano metres across. UNIFORM and very very small, meaning they were costructed with advance technology. Advanced technology? There were ALIENS involved?Why have we not heard about this before? WHAT ELSE IS BEING COVERED UP??!!!11??!!Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,501 #53 November 1, 2010 Quoteneither arguments are acknowledging that Nanothermite is only produced by dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process. Who here would like to see Rhys describe dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process in his own words? I would, I think it'd be awesome. Shall we have a poll?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #54 November 1, 2010 my favorite martian , uncle martin ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,009 #55 November 1, 2010 Your one warning. Cut it out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #56 November 1, 2010 Quote The burden of proof is on you to show that the findings are not in line with a jetliner crashing into the building. The burden is not on other people to disprove your wildly fantastic, incredible, unbelievable screwball CT's. Eeeeer, I would have thought the discovery if highly engineerd incendiaries, the residue they produce and in abundence in the rubble would be exactly that. You are ignoring that fact. Quote You have yet to provide a shred of evidence that can not be accounted for by the officially accepted description of the events. Are you really that ignorant? Or are you blind to things that do not fit with your belief system. This entire thread fits the desciption of your request. but you chose to ignore it like everybody else that is up to thier eyeballs in guilt for not seeing reason earlier, and are responsable for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people. These murders are also ommited from the daily news and, replaced by drug addicted crack whore actresses doing stupid things to keep you all entertained while crimes of vast proportions are carried out with your name on them. Ignorence is bliss, but you have the blood of many peoples lives on your hands by ignoring tangible evidence. your call. I'll keep my integrety while you stick you your straw man arguments, ignoring facts (and the entire thread) and defending corrupt criminals that could care less about you."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #57 November 1, 2010 Quote Your one warning. Cut it out. Explain so I do not repeat please."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #58 November 1, 2010 Where in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #59 November 1, 2010 OH C'MON!! Everyone knows that God did it..... http://www.september11news.com/Mysteries1.htm His face was everywhere during the crisis OBVIOUSLY!! Quit your rubbish - only MY link shows the real truth!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #60 November 1, 2010 QuoteWhere in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens.have you not been following my discussion of the historical developmentment of nanothermite paper ? my next update was going to cover the development you mention . thanks for ruining it. it involved a thoroughbred horse with champion bloodlines. it would always come in dead last. the announcers LOVED this horse . wanna know why ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shermanator 4 #61 November 2, 2010 rhys, I'm watching national geo right now,` and your show is on!CLICK HERE! new blog posted 9/21/08 CSA #720 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #62 November 2, 2010 what the one about talking snakes, immaculate conception, imaginary friends and people that talk to themself before bed to ensure a lif in a supposed wonderland after death? Oh that is your progrm. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #63 November 2, 2010 QuoteWhere in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens. Once again a pathetic post related to nothing and with no meaning. At least you are consistent. Ignoring the facts and using strawman techniques"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #64 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote Where in the hell is the nanothermite tissue paper when someone needs it to wipe stuff off their screens. Once again a pathetic post related to nothing and with no meaning. At least you are consistent. Ignoring the facts and using strawman techniques DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE Unclench already Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #65 November 2, 2010 -Depends on your definition of uniform and what tolerence you allow for variance. It is completely subjective. -It only seems unlikely because you do not understand how it can happen. Go take some chem classes at your local university. -Tha samples are questionable because there is no documentation to show they were collected as claimed. Just because some guy says he collected a sample from his laundry room next a a window doesn't mean he actually did. For all we know these suppliers of the samples could be buddies of yours who conspired to supply real dust samples they later contaminated to intentionally decieve the public. That is far more likely than anything you have suggested. -Being that these men have associated themselves with crackpots I hesitate to acknowledge anything they write. -Nice picture. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #66 November 2, 2010 No, the one where real scientists and engineers take on the truthers. http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/9-11-science-and-conspiracy-4067/conspiracy-vs-science But it's all part of the conspiracy to cover it up."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #67 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteneither arguments are acknowledging that Nanothermite is only produced by dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process. Who here would like to see Rhys describe dynamic gas-phase condensation or the pulsed plasma process in his own words? I would, I think it'd be awesome. Shall we have a poll? Aye! But we all know he won't because he doesn't know a thing about the technology.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #68 November 2, 2010 QuoteDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE Unclench alreadySly Once again, I am anything but uptight about this. i don't feeel the need to come and disturb your discussions with irrelevant points. So I suggest you stick to the suject matter or simply go away and tru to find someone that has the time for you. But you like to shit stir, and now Bill has given me a warning, it is obvious you are trying to provoke me into some sort reaction. You are wasting your time woman. I'm a cool as a cucumber and nobody has had anything but straw man arguments in this thead as the paper you ridicule is not refutable, uness one actually looks at the evidence themselves. Straw man arguments are not real arguments. They are megre attempts of those that use them to keep their integrety. The integrety they have pushed all in on the very people they spend the rest of the time trying to say are lyers in threads on other subjects? bizzare!"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #69 November 2, 2010 what about my thoroughbred ? it's a conspiracy ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #70 November 2, 2010 Quote the paper you ridicule is not refutable, uness one actually looks at the evidence themselves The way in which the evidence was collected means the entire paper means absolutely nothing relating to the WTC. The substances studied are not anything unusual. You have been challenged repeatedly to give YOUR explanations, yet you always and still evade doing so. Here's your chance! Time to put up! HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,009 #71 November 2, 2010 >The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in >the dust samples) The referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere. http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/papers/2009/CCGP-D-09-00017-Valentim.pdf >NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, >yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away >from the complex. There is a coal fired power plant less than 50 miles from New York City. It has been operating for over 40 years. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #72 November 2, 2010 Quote>The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in >the dust samples)The referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere.http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/papers/2009/CCGP-D-09-00017-Valentim.pdf>NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, >yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away >from the complex. There is a coal fired power plant less than 50 miles from New York City. It has been operating for over 40 years.very seldom do i enjoy your posts , this one is very refreshing . thank you. it should be just the thing to stop the insanity . somehow intuition says otherwise ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #73 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote >The byproduct of thermite is iron spheres (also found in abundence in >the dust samples) The referenced paper explains how iron-rich microspheres are produced via high temperature combustion in coal fired power plants and how they separate themselves by size once in the atmosphere. http://www.coalcgp-journal.org/papers/2009/CCGP-D-09-00017-Valentim.pdf >NIST suggests the heat in the resulting rubble piles produced the speres, >yet they are found in samples taken from the top of buildings blocks away >from the complex. There is a coal fired power plant less than 50 miles from New York City. It has been operating for over 40 years. very seldom do i enjoy your posts , this one is very refreshing . thank you. it should be just the thing to stop the insanity . somehow intuition says otherwise ! OMFG we agreed twice in one day.... Quick everyone check to make sure that the holier than thou's are all still here and have not been miracled out of here for the RAPTURE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #74 November 2, 2010 must be our women's intuition x_o Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhys 0 #75 November 2, 2010 QuoteNo, the one where real scientists and engineers take on the truthers. http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/...onspiracy-vs-science But it's all part of the conspiracy to cover it up. Once again straw man techniques; QuoteConspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers. Science: Some Truthers claim that pulverized dust found by some New Yorkers after the attack contained the chemical signature of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes. EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center. Read more: http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/9-11-science-and-conspiracy-4067/conspiracy-vs-science#ixzz145OoTvLG you mates at national geogrpahic ignore knowledge they already know, just as NIST know. There is a wealth of information on thermite used ofr demolition.a couple of examples; http://www.patentstorm.us/search.html?q=thermite+demolition&s.x=0&s.y=0&s=s http://www.freepatentsonline.com /7555986.html haha, Just watched the Nat Geo, presentation. These straw man tactics issued but the companies ownd by PNAC signatories are pathetic. Comparing commercial grade thermite to nano thermite is like comparing diesel to aviation gas. these straw man techniques may work on you, but they are far from conclusive. and the assertin that the twin towers are the most controversial aspect of the events is also a blatant lie. The lack of exposure of Building 7 by the MSM is the most contrvertial, lets see if bulding 7 is mentioned anywhere in that presentation... oh it made a cameo, for few seconds. lets look at the pseudo science used in that presentation. the thermite used in their experient was similar to that used in sparklers, sparklers have metal sticks that the product is bound to and it does not melt. The thermitic red chips the paper is about clearly point ou the nano sizes particles, and the use of sulpher to lower the tmperature needed to melt the steel. That expriment is like comparing a fire cracker to dynamite. The fire cracker does not blow up the letterbox so dynamit would not either. Stupid. next the projectile, they use wooden boards to represent the pentagon and scale it dowm significantly but they do not scale down the speed of the projectile... convenient. that experiment was very humerous but had no scientific merit. much like myth busters. now placing a steel i beam a fraction of the size of those found in the wtc, in an ope air environment, with absolutely no heat sink also is a mis representation of the fires withing the WTC complex. If you don't kow what a heat sink is then you should learn. NONE of those experiemts represented what happened on 9/11, and none of them took into consideration the difference between nano thermite and ordinary thermite. The controlled demolition team had no experience with thermite (leat alone nano thermite) and they were looking for similarities in their demolition when there was nothing in common with the way they set up. The reasoning of that production was not to prove anything by experiment, it was meant to discredit richard gage, DRG and Dylan to people of your ilk, as anyone that understands scuence would realise how flawed those experiments ALL were. haha a wooden pentagon, haha, seriously."When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites